Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VG vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
VG vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $23.63B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.77B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.58B | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.35B | $10.68B |
VG vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venture Global, Inc. (VG) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 139.1 | +39.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VG vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 176.9%, EPS growth 41.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 12.6%, current ratio 0.93x
- 176.9% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5%
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- 107.4% 10Y total return vs VG's -49.6%
- Beta -0.15, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 176.9% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (12.6% vs 16.3%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs VG's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.7% vs VG's +38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs VG's 5.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs 17.3% |
VG vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VG vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 23.5x VG's $13.8B. VG is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, VG holds the edge at +191.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.8B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.0B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.8B | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.4% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.7% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, VG trades at a 37% valuation discount to XOM's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VG's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.6B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.8B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.95x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.50x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.81x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VG delivers a 25.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. VG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOM's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VG scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.8% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.3% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$847M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.47x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $27,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,035 for VG. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +45.7% total return vs VG's +38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.7% vs VG's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.7% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.7% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.4% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VG's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOM currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs VG's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.50 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.83 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.5% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28.7M | 18.8M |
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VG as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs 5.1% for VG (target: $13). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.69% vs VG's 1.47%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.61 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
VG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
VG vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VG or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) is the stronger pick with 176. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Venture Global, Inc. (VG) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Venture Global, Inc. (VG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VG or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Venture Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VG or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +171.
8%, compared to -49. 6% for Venture Global, Inc. (VG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +107. 4% versus VG's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VG or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Venture Global, Inc. 's 0. 22β — meaning VG is approximately -252% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Venture Global, Inc. (VG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 16% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VG or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) is pulling ahead at 176. 9% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Venture Global, Inc. grew EPS 41. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VG leads at 28. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VG or XOM?
Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VG leads at 36. 6% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VG leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VG or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — VG or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Venture Global, Inc. (VG).
09Is VG or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, VG: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VG and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.