Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Office
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Office | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.60B | $105.21B | $66.93B | $37.71B | $83.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.50B | $9.46B | $6.19B | $7.25B | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-568M | $1.42B | $1.31B | $272M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 51.3% | 40.0% | 55.0% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 20.8% | 13.7% | 18.0% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | 63.0x | 96.3x | 56.3x | 27.4x |
| Total Debt | $18.45B | $22.73B | $24.18B | $19.05B | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.04B | $1.73B | $3.45B | $159M | $1.47B |
VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
| Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) | 100 | 152.9 | +52.9% |
| Digital Realty Trus… (DLR) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 492.2 | +392.2% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VNET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- +42.2% vs AMT's -15.0%
EQIX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 1.32x
- PEG 2.34 vs AMT's 3.76
- Beta 0.42 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage
DLR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.77, yield 2.5%, current ratio 4.50x
IRM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 298.8% 10Y total return vs EQIX's 248.6%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AMT's 5.1%
AMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 3.7%
- Lower P/E (27.4x vs 56.3x)
- 26.6% margin vs VNET's -6.0%
- 3.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EQIX's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AMT's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.4x vs 56.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs VNET's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EQIX's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs AMT's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs VNET's -1.5%, ROIC 6.9% vs 2.4% |
VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
VNET leads 0 • EQIX leads 0 • DLR leads 0 • IRM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 1.7x DLR's $6.2B. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, VNET holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.5B | $9.5B | $6.2B | $7.2B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $4.1B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$568M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $272M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.9B | $888M | $233M | -$625M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +51.3% | +40.0% | +55.0% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +20.8% | +13.7% | +18.0% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +15.0% | +21.1% | +3.8% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.7% | +9.4% | +3.8% | -8.6% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.8% | +9.8% | +19.3% | +21.6% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +20.0% | -51.0% | +7.9% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VNET and AMT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.3x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 87% valuation discount to IRM's 258.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DLR offers better value at 1.87x vs AMT's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $105.2B | $66.9B | $37.7B | $83.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $126.2B | $87.7B | $56.6B | $127.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 92.39x | 77.53x | 54.41x | 258.73x | 33.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.74x | 62.99x | 96.29x | 56.26x | 27.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.88x | 1.87x | — | 4.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.40x | 32.25x | 34.33x | 23.30x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.14x | 11.36x | 10.95x | 5.46x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.56x | 7.38x | 2.76x | — | 8.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 27.75x | — | 22.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. DLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs IRM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | +10.0% | +5.3% | — | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | +3.6% | +2.7% | +1.3% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +4.3% | +1.2% | +6.2% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +5.4% | +1.5% | +8.2% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 1.60x | 0.97x | — | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.4B | $21.0B | $20.7B | $18.9B | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $1.7B | $3.5B | $159M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18.4B | $22.7B | $24.2B | $19.1B | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.75x | 3.53x | 3.87x | 1.28x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VNET and IRM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $34,010 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,486 for VNET. Over the past 12 months, VNET leads with a +42.2% total return vs AMT's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.2% vs AMT's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | +40.3% | +26.4% | +53.3% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.2% | +24.5% | +19.4% | +33.7% | -15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.7% | +51.2% | +115.1% | +142.0% | +3.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.1% | +60.2% | +44.9% | +240.1% | -14.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.8% | +248.6% | +156.9% | +298.8% | +113.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.2% | +14.8% | +29.1% | +34.3% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRM and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRM currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs VNET's 61.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 0.42x | 0.77x | 1.10x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.48 | $1128.68 | $208.09 | $134.09 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.15 | $710.52 | $146.23 | $77.77 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.9% | +94.5% | +93.6% | +94.5% | +76.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.0 | 62.5 | 61.5 | 78.2 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 555K | 1.9M | 1.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
AMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VNET as "Buy", EQIX as "Buy", DLR as "Buy", IRM as "Buy", AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.8% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs 4.4% for IRM (target: $132). For income investors, AMT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs EQIX's 1.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.55 | $1117.40 | $209.00 | $132.33 | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 51 | 48 | 20 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +2.5% | +2.4% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | 0 | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $18.92 | $4.92 | $3.09 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
AMT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
VNET vs EQIX vs DLR vs IRM vs AMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (27. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
3x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 258. 7x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equinix, Inc. wins at 2. 34x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 76x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +240.
1%, compared to -65. 1% for VNET Group, Inc. (VNET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +298. 8% versus VNET's -36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately -7305% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRM leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 8. 1% for VNET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 34x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 76x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 4x forward P/E versus 96. 3x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. — 68. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 162. 8% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT?
In this comparison, AMT (3.
7% yield), DLR (2. 5% yield), IRM (2. 4% yield), EQIX (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. VNET does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VNET or EQIX or DLR or IRM or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +113. 8% 10Y return). VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 8%, VNET: -36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VNET and EQIX and DLR and IRM and AMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (VNET (Technology) and EQIX (Real Estate) and DLR (Real Estate) and IRM (Real Estate) and AMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EQIX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. EQIX, DLR, IRM, AMT pay a dividend while VNET does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.