Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Semiconductors
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Staffing & Employment Services | Semiconductors | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $836M | $790M | $4.02B | $349M | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $299M | $1.33B | $3.07B | $3.09B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $35M | $-9M | $-266M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | 27.2% | 19.4% | 26.3% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 3.8% | 1.9% | -2.8% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 79.2x | 18.0x | 60.4x | 11.0x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $70M | $1.17B | $159M | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $2M | $515M | $33M | $871M |
VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vishay Precision Gr… (VPG) | 100 | 264.3 | +164.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Vishay Intertechnol… (VSH) | 100 | 200.4 | +100.4% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VPG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 344.0% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 195.5%
- 2.7% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
- +172.6% vs MAN's -17.0%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs VSH's 2.43, lower leverage
VSH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 71.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.3%
- 4.5% revenue growth vs VPG's -13.7%
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 60.4x)
- 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% revenue growth vs VPG's -13.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 60.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.7% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs VSH's 2.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +172.6% vs MAN's -17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VPG leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • KFRC leads 0 • VSH leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 60.0x VPG's $299M. VPG is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, VSH holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $299M | $1.3B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $56M | $282M | -$54M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $35M | -$9M | -$266M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $43M | -$89M | $66M | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +27.2% | +19.4% | +26.3% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +3.8% | +1.9% | -2.8% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +2.6% | -0.3% | -8.6% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +3.3% | -2.9% | +2.1% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | +0.1% | +12.1% | -100.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +2.2% | +101.5% | -2.1% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 74% valuation discount to VPG's 84.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VPG's 24.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $836M | $790M | $4.0B | $349M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $812M | $858M | $4.7B | $475M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 84.36x | 22.05x | -493.04x | -1.34x | -104.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 79.17x | 17.96x | 60.35x | 10.96x | 8.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.85x | 15.42x | 16.61x | — | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 0.59x | 1.31x | 0.08x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.60x | 6.17x | 2.12x | 0.35x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.45x | 16.88x | — | 3.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VPG and KFRC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VPG scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | +27.2% | -0.4% | -24.6% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +9.2% | -0.2% | -11.3% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +19.1% | +1.6% | -4.0% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +20.1% | +1.6% | -4.3% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.56x | 0.56x | 0.16x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $68M | $654M | $126M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $2M | $515M | $33M | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $70M | $1.2B | $159M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.20x | — | 1.66x | -12.07x | 1.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VPG five years ago would be worth $19,022 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, VPG leads with a +172.6% total return vs MAN's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VPG at 17.5% vs MAN's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.9% | +39.2% | +113.8% | +13.1% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +172.6% | +18.9% | +172.0% | -12.2% | -17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.1% | -13.8% | +57.2% | -34.2% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.2% | -16.8% | +40.6% | -58.3% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +344.0% | +195.5% | +194.7% | -33.0% | -30.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | -4.8% | +16.3% | -13.0% | -18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KFRC and VSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSH's 2.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VSH currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 0.53x | 2.43x | 1.01x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.12 | $47.48 | $34.23 | $14.94 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.66 | $24.49 | $11.77 | $7.98 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +91.0% | +95.2% | +64.9% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.1 | 65.6 | 86.0 | 63.7 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 305K | 2.3M | 361K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VPG as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", VSH as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -23.3% for VSH (target: $25). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs VSH's 1.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $71.00 | $25.00 | $15.00 | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | +1.1% | +3.2% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | $0.36 | $0.31 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +6.4% | +0.3% | +3.5% | +2.7% |
VPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
VPG vs KFRC vs VSH vs KELYA vs MAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
(VSH) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 7% for Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Vishay Precision Group, Inc. at 84. 4x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
(VPG) delivered a total return of +90. 2%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VPG returned +344. 0% versus KELYA's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 's 2. 43β — meaning VSH is approximately 360% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
(VSH) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -13. 7% for Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. grew EPS 71. 3% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VPG leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN?
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
(VPG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VPG leads at 5. 5% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VPG leads at 41. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 79. 2x for Vishay Precision Group, Inc. — 70. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield), VSH (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. VPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VPG or KFRC or VSH or KELYA or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, VPG: +344. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VPG and KFRC and VSH and KELYA and MAN?
These companies operate in different sectors (VPG (Technology) and KFRC (Industrials) and VSH (Technology) and KELYA (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VSH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC, VSH, KELYA, MAN pay a dividend while VPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.