REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $604M | $25.85B | $12.04B | $24.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $291M | $193M | $3.04B | $1.72B | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $554M | $1.05B | $491M | $954M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 55.2% | 67.0% | 46.0% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 66.3% | 30.1% | 27.4% | 28.5% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 1.1x | 37.7x | 66.1x | 50.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.37B | $0.00 | $9.33B | $6.19B | $8.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $395M | $187M | $37M | $56M |
VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veris Residential, … (VRE) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| Apartment Investmen… (AIV) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
| UDR, Inc. (UDR) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 420.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 0.08x
- 6.4% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0%
- Beta 0.22 vs AIV's 0.69
AIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 85.0% 10Y total return vs AVB's 31.6%
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 50.6x)
- 287.7% margin vs VRE's 24.2%
- 68.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UDR's 4.6%
AVB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
UDR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 4.6%
- PEG 1.60 vs EQR's 9.94
- Beta 0.39, yield 4.6%, current ratio 3.31x
Among these 5 stocks, EQR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 50.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 287.7% margin vs VRE's 24.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs AIV's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 68.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UDR's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.8% vs UDR's -9.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.6% ROA vs VRE's 2.5%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.3% |
VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories
VRE leads 2 • AVB leads 0 • UDR leads 0 • EQR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 16.2x AIV's $193M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (AIV) to 24.2% (VRE). On growth, AVB holds the edge at +3.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $291M | $193M | $3.0B | $1.7B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $129M | $186M | $1.8B | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $554M | $1.1B | $491M | $954M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | -$230M | $1.5B | $892M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +55.2% | +67.0% | +46.0% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +66.3% | +30.1% | +27.4% | +28.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +2.9% | +34.6% | +28.6% | +30.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | -119.5% | +49.7% | +52.0% | +42.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -3.4% | +3.7% | +0.9% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +25.9% | -40.9% | +147.8% | -64.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AIV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, AIV trades at a 97% valuation discount to UDR's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UDR offers better value at 0.79x vs AVB's 5.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $604M | $25.8B | $12.0B | $24.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $209M | $35.0B | $18.2B | $33.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.71x | 1.11x | 25.14x | 32.69x | 22.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 37.72x | 66.06x | 50.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 5.37x | 0.79x | 4.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.09x | 2.09x | 19.15x | 18.15x | 15.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.17x | — | 8.51x | 7.03x | 7.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 1.17x | 2.23x | 2.95x | 2.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.39x | — | 18.28x | 19.61x | 19.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AIV and EQR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV delivers a 162.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $163 in annual profit, vs $6 for VRE. EQR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UDR's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRE scores 7/9 vs AIV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +162.9% | +8.8% | +12.4% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +29.6% | +4.8% | +4.7% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +4.2% | +3.3% | +2.3% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +2.3% | +4.4% | +3.1% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | — | 0.79x | 1.49x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | -$395M | $9.1B | $6.2B | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $395M | $187M | $37M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $0 | $9.3B | $6.2B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 0.70x | 5.07x | — | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIV five years ago would be worth $12,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,739 for UDR. Over the past 12 months, VRE leads with a +22.8% total return vs UDR's -9.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRE at 6.7% vs UDR's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | -2.4% | +3.9% | +3.0% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | -1.4% | -7.2% | -9.5% | -2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +5.1% | +14.4% | +1.9% | +17.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | +23.5% | +12.1% | -2.6% | +6.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +85.0% | +31.6% | +38.8% | +29.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +1.7% | +4.6% | +0.6% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
VRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIV's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRE currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs AIV's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.69x | 0.48x | 0.39x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.03 | $8.87 | $209.86 | $43.12 | $71.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.69 | $3.94 | $160.09 | $32.94 | $57.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +48.6% | +88.5% | +85.7% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 50.1 | 71.2 | 64.9 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.9M | 940K | 3.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIV and UDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VRE as "Hold", AIV as "Hold", AVB as "Hold", UDR as "Buy", EQR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 132.0% upside for AIV (target: $10) vs -26.2% for VRE (target: $14). For income investors, AIV offers the higher dividend yield at 68.35% vs VRE's 1.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $10.00 | $191.70 | $40.25 | $70.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 3 | 42 | 38 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +68.4% | +3.8% | +4.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $2.95 | $6.99 | $1.72 | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.0% | +1.9% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VRE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
VRE vs AIV vs AVB vs UDR vs EQR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UDR, Inc. (UDR) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR?
On trailing P/E, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus UDR, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UDR, Inc. wins at 1. 60x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR?
Over the past 5 years, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) delivered a total return of +23.
5%, compared to -2. 6% for UDR, Inc. (UDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIV returned +85. 0% versus VRE's -12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Apartment Investment and Management Company's 0. 69β — meaning AIV is approximately 210% more volatile than VRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equity Residential (EQR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 149% for UDR, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apartment Investment and Management Company grew EPS 623. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 8% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRE leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR?
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the more profitable company, earning 287.
7% net margin versus 22. 1% for UDR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 287. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIV leads at 66. 3% versus 17. 1% for VRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVB leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UDR, Inc. (UDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for UDR, Inc. — 28. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIV: 132. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the highest yield at 68. 4%, versus 1. 7% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE).
09Is VRE or AIV or AVB or UDR or EQR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRE: -12. 8%, AIV: +85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRE and AIV and AVB and UDR and EQR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; UDR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.