Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Communication Equipment
Asset Management
Asset Management
VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Asset Management | Communication Equipment | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $7M | $243M | $1.38B | $199M | $3.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $97M | $636M | $40M | $547M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-12M | $50M | $28M | $289M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 83.5% | 55.7% | 18.0% | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | -60.2% | 77.9% | 12.1% | -4.0% | 66.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x | 21.8x | 6.1x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $469M | $148M | $473M | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $775K | $20M | $101M | $106M | $57M |
VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VS Media Holdings L… (VSME) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 57.3 | -42.7% |
| Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 38.0 | -62.0% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +39.8% vs HRZN's -23.2%
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs VSME's 3.2%
HLIT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 269.9% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 171.6%
- 6.5% ROA vs VSME's -20.6%, ROIC 9.3% vs -104.0%
HRZN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Beta 0.70, yield 27.8%, current ratio 1.24x
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 8.4x)
HTGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, current ratio 1.44x
- NIM 9.1% vs HRZN's 7.1%
- 62.1% margin vs VSME's -70.1%
- Beta 0.69 vs VSME's 2.67, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs VSME's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 8.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 62.1% margin vs VSME's -70.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs VSME's 2.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs HTGC's 8.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs VSME's -20.6%, ROIC 9.3% vs -104.0% |
VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HTGC leads 1 • HLIT leads 1 • VSME leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLIT is the larger business by revenue, generating $636M annually — 301.7x VSME's $2M. HTGC is the more profitable business, keeping 62.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSME's -70.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $97M | $636M | $40M | $547M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$22M | $88M | $19M | $381M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$12M | $50M | $28M | $289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$192,882 | $35M | $133M | $67M | -$352M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +83.5% | +55.7% | +18.0% | +87.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.2% | +77.9% | +12.1% | -4.0% | +66.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -70.1% | +50.6% | +7.8% | -6.6% | +62.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | -58.7% | +21.0% | +141.5% | -77.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -27.3% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.3% | -87.5% | -29.6% | -20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 88% valuation discount to HLIT's 37.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $243M | $1.4B | $199M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $691M | $1.4B | $567M | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.72x | 4.91x | 37.21x | 4.30x | 8.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 21.80x | 6.10x | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x | 18.93x | — | 14.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 2.50x | 2.03x | 4.97x | 5.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 0.68x | 3.10x | 0.60x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 26.13x | 3.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-115 for VSME. HLIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSME's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIT scores 7/9 vs VSME's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -115.5% | -3.4% | +11.2% | +9.0% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | -1.5% | +6.5% | +3.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.0% | +7.2% | +9.3% | -0.2% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +9.4% | +11.2% | -0.2% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 1.33x | 0.32x | 1.49x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $449M | $47M | $368M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $775,246 | $20M | $101M | $106M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $469M | $148M | $473M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.22x | -1.02x | 12.92x | 0.60x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VSME and HLIT and HTGC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HLIT five years ago would be worth $16,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $265 for VSME. Over the past 12 months, VSME leads with a +39.8% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs VSME's -70.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +874.6% | -6.3% | +22.6% | -26.7% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +19.3% | +38.1% | -23.2% | +6.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -3.4% | -8.9% | -27.7% | +63.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -13.5% | +69.4% | -32.8% | +46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +93.3% | +269.9% | +52.9% | +171.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.2% | -1.2% | -3.1% | -10.3% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HLIT and HTGC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTGC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSME's 2.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLIT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs VSME's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.67x | 0.83x | 1.51x | 0.70x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.21 | $7.53 | $12.38 | $8.46 | $19.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.07 | $4.48 | $7.80 | $3.80 | $13.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +79.5% | +99.2% | +53.3% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 58.3 | 76.9 | 58.5 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 757K | 504K | 1.1M | 1.2M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", HLIT as "Hold", HRZN as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 1.8% for HLIT (target: $13). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs HTGC's 8.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $12.50 | $6.50 | $18.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 19 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | — | +27.8% | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — | $1.25 | $1.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HRZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). HTGC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
VSME vs TPVG vs HLIT vs HRZN vs HTGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (VSME). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Harmonic Inc. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC?
Over the past 5 years, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) delivered a total return of +69. 4%, compared to -97. 4% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (VSME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLIT returned +269. 9% versus VSME's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 67β — meaning VSME is approximately 288% more volatile than HTGC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 3% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 3. 2% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (VSME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Harmonic Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSME leads at 80. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC?
Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 1% net margin versus -88. 4% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 62. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -83. 7% for VSME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTGC leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Harmonic Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
8% yield), TPVG (17. 1% yield), HTGC (8. 6% yield) pay a dividend. VSME, HLIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VSME or TPVG or HLIT or HRZN or HTGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 8. 6% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (VSME) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTGC: +171. 6%, VSME: -97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSME and TPVG and HLIT and HRZN and HTGC?
These companies operate in different sectors (VSME (Communication Services) and TPVG (Financial Services) and HLIT (Technology) and HRZN (Financial Services) and HTGC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VSME is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HLIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG, HRZN, HTGC pay a dividend while VSME, HLIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.