Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
Staffing & Employment Services
VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $11.84B | $68.52B | $2.39B | $349M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.71B | $18.79B | $10.79B | $8.87B | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-47M | $317M | $1.90B | $158M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | 7.0% | 50.2% | 11.5% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 4.2% | 23.0% | 3.7% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.2x | 20.3x | 34.8x | 10.3x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $5.72B | $2.65B | $1.69B | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $639M | $264M | $104M | $33M |
VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vestis Corporation (VSTS) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Aramark (ARMK) | 100 | 179.9 | +79.9% |
| Cintas Corporation (CTAS) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| ABM Industries Inco… (ABM) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +70.9% vs CTAS's -20.1%
ARMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 23.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
CTAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.09x
- 7.7% revenue growth vs VSTS's -2.5%
ABM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.04 vs CTAS's 2.08
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.04 vs 2.08
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% revenue growth vs VSTS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.04 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs VSTS's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.9% vs CTAS's -20.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.7% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 25.8% vs -4.0% |
VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTAS leads in 2 of 6 categories
VSTS leads 0 • ARMK leads 0 • ABM leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 6.9x VSTS's $2.7B. CTAS is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, CTAS holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $18.8B | $10.8B | $8.9B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $203M | $1.3B | $2.9B | $431M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$47M | $317M | $1.9B | $158M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $88M | $257M | $1.8B | $327M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +7.0% | +50.2% | +11.5% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +4.2% | +23.0% | +3.7% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +1.7% | +17.6% | +1.8% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +1.4% | +16.5% | +3.7% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +6.1% | +9.3% | +6.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.7% | +11.0% | -7.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ABM and KELYA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, ABM trades at a 59% valuation discount to CTAS's 38.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABM offers better value at 0.05x vs CTAS's 2.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $11.8B | $68.5B | $2.4B | $349M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $16.9B | $70.9B | $4.0B | $475M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.98x | 36.93x | 38.65x | 15.74x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.25x | 20.26x | 34.75x | 10.30x | 10.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.31x | 0.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.57x | 13.35x | 24.85x | 9.23x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 0.64x | 6.63x | 0.27x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 3.81x | 14.89x | 1.43x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 212.64x | 26.06x | 39.00x | 15.40x | 3.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTAS delivers a 42.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARMK's 1.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTAS scores 9/9 vs VSTS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | +9.8% | +42.6% | +8.8% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +2.4% | +18.7% | +3.0% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +7.3% | +25.8% | +7.5% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +8.7% | +29.8% | +8.2% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.64x | 1.81x | 0.57x | 0.95x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $5.1B | $2.4B | $1.6B | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $639M | $264M | $104M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $5.7B | $2.7B | $1.7B | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 2.20x | 24.61x | 3.25x | -12.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VSTS and ARMK and CTAS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTAS five years ago would be worth $19,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,168 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, VSTS leads with a +70.9% total return vs CTAS's -20.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMK at 23.3% vs VSTS's -21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.3% | +23.5% | -7.8% | -3.1% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.9% | +19.0% | -20.1% | -16.0% | -12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.6% | +87.4% | +51.7% | +3.4% | -34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.6% | +70.5% | +95.8% | -14.1% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.6% | +97.1% | +685.0% | +48.7% | -33.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.0% | +23.3% | +14.9% | +1.1% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARMK and CTAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSTS's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARMK currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.71x | 0.51x | 0.72x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.38 | $46.88 | $229.24 | $52.94 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.98 | $35.07 | $165.46 | $36.96 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.5% | +96.1% | +74.2% | +77.0% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 62.0 | 37.7 | 54.8 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.2M | 2.2M | 512K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABM and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VSTS as "Sell", ARMK as "Buy", CTAS as "Hold", ABM as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -36.5% for VSTS (target: $6). For income investors, KELYA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs CTAS's 0.88%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.90 | $47.20 | $223.40 | $50.00 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 24 | 30 | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 36 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $0.41 | $1.49 | $1.05 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +5.1% | +3.5% |
CTAS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
VSTS vs ARMK vs CTAS vs ABM vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Vestis Corporation (VSTS). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aramark (ARMK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus Cintas Corporation at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) delivered a total return of +95.
8%, compared to -58. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTAS returned +685. 0% versus VSTS's -50. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Vestis Corporation's 1. 34β — meaning VSTS is approximately 163% more volatile than CTAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 181% for Aramark — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus -2. 5% for Vestis Corporation (VSTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARMK leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA?
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTAS leads at 22. 8% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTAS leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Cintas Corporation — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 54. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
09Is VSTS or ARMK or CTAS or ABM or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 0. 9% yield, +685. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTAS: +685. 0%, VSTS: -50. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSTS and ARMK and CTAS and ABM and KELYA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VSTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CTAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.