Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $234M | $398M | $5.06B | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $0.00 | $4M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-120M | $-223M | $-569M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | -41.7% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | -326.6% | — | -134.1% | -83.9% |
| Total Debt | $36M | $25M | $395M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $65M | $78M | $355M | $434M |
VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voyager Therapeutic… (VYGR) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VYGR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.31
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31 vs CRSP's 1.93, lower leverage
CRSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 272.0% 10Y total return vs VYGR's -67.6%
- +53.1% vs RCKT's -45.2%
- -24.5% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC -22.3% vs -63.2%
RARE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
- -91.0% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -91.0% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs CRSP's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.1% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -24.5% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC -22.3% vs -63.2% |
VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRSP leads in 2 of 6 categories
RARE leads 1 • VYGR leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. RARE is the more profitable business, keeping -91.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, VYGR holds the edge at +144.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $0 | $4M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | -$232M | -$535M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$120M | -$223M | -$569M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | -$190M | -$401M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | -41.7% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | — | -134.1% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | — | -138.6% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | — | -97.8% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +144.3% | — | +68.6% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +38.7% | +19.0% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VYGR and CRSP and RARE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $234M | $398M | $5.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $205M | $345M | $5.1B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.94x | -1.83x | -8.10x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.79x | — | 1440.41x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.47x | 2.45x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRSP leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRSP delivers a -30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-31 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRSP's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RARE scores 4/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.4% | -80.5% | -30.9% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.4% | -67.5% | -24.5% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.0% | -63.2% | -22.3% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.3% | -58.9% | -26.6% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.09x | 0.21x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | -$53M | $40M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $65M | $78M | $355M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $25M | $395M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VYGR five years ago would be worth $9,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, CRSP leads with a +53.1% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRSP at -2.2% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | +6.1% | -2.5% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | -45.2% | +53.1% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.3% | -82.8% | -6.3% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.1% | -91.6% | -51.3% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | -91.3% | +272.0% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.9% | -44.4% | -2.2% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VYGR and RCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRSP's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VYGR currently trades 71.4% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 1.31x | 1.93x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.55 | $7.39 | $78.48 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.65 | $2.19 | $33.50 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.4% | +49.7% | +66.8% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 54.4 | 55.5 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 694K | 3.5M | 2.0M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VYGR as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 263.6% upside for VYGR (target: $14) vs 20.2% for CRSP (target: $63).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.40 | $5.00 | $63.00 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 19 | 38 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CRSP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RARE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
VYGR vs RCKT vs CRSP vs RARE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Analysts rate Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (VYGR) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Voyager Therapeutics, Inc.
(VYGR) delivered a total return of -8. 1%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +272. 0% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus CRISPR Therapeutics AG's 1. 93β — meaning CRSP is approximately 47% more volatile than RCKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 21% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to -80. 5% for Voyager Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE?
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCKT leads at 0. 0% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VYGR or RCKT or CRSP or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (VYGR) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCKT: -91. 3%, VYGR: -67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VYGR and RCKT and CRSP and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VYGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.