Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WABC vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
WABC vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.37B | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 60.8% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $601M | $108M |
WABC vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westamerica Bancorp… (WABC) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WABC vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WABC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 0.39x
- PEG 1.04 vs CVBF's 4.51
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -2.3%, EPS growth 5.6%
- 67.4% 10Y total return vs WABC's 53.3%
- -2.3% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.3% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 14.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 4.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CVBF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs CVBF's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.1% vs CVBF's +13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CVBF's 0.4% |
WABC vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WABC vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WABC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $643M annually — 2.1x WABC's $311M. WABC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVBF's 32.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $171M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $123M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +60.8% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.6% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WABC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, WABC trades at a 23% valuation discount to CVBF's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WABC offers better value at 0.89x vs CVBF's 4.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $909M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.51x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.30x | 14.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.89x | 4.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.56x | 13.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.41x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.82x | 12.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. WABC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVBF's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVBF scores 6/9 vs WABC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$463M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $601M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.87x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVBF five years ago would be worth $11,190 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,837 for WABC. Over the past 12 months, WABC leads with a +16.1% total return vs CVBF's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.9% vs WABC's 16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.1% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +95.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.6% | +11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.3% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WABC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WABC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.22 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.93 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WABC and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WABC as "Hold" and CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 4.3% for WABC (target: $57). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.96% vs WABC's 3.22%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 27 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.9% |
WABC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CVBF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
WABC vs CVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WABC or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the stronger pick with -2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WABC or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus CVB Financial Corp. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Westamerica Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 12. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westamerica Bancorporation wins at 1. 04x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 51x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WABC or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) delivered a total return of +11. 9%, compared to -1. 6% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVBF returned +67. 4% versus WABC's +53. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WABC or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning CVBF is approximately 48% more volatile than WABC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 43% for CVB Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WABC or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is pulling ahead at -2. 3% versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 5. 6% year-over-year, compared to -14. 2% for Westamerica Bancorporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WABC or CVBF?
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more profitable company, earning 44.
6% net margin versus 32. 5% for CVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 44. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WABC leads at 60. 8% versus 43. 8% for CVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WABC leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WABC or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 51x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for CVB Financial Corp. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 0% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — WABC or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 2% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC).
09Is WABC or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WABC: +53. 3%, CVBF: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WABC and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.