Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WABC vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
WABC vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $616.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 60.8% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $601M | $20.15B |
WABC vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westamerica Bancorp… (WABC) | 100 | 93.0 | -7.0% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WABC vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WABC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 0.39x
- PEG 1.05 vs V's 1.55
V is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 329.1% 10Y total return vs WABC's 54.8%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 24.6x), PEG 1.05 vs 1.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WABC's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs V's 0.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.9% vs V's -7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WABC's 0.3% |
WABC vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WABC vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 128.5x WABC's $311M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WABC's 44.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $171M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $123M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +60.8% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.6% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WABC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, WABC trades at a 67% valuation discount to V's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WABC offers better value at 0.90x vs V's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $616.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $914M | $621.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.55x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.34x | 24.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.90x | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.58x | 24.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.43x | 15.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 16.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.85x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $13 for WABC. WABC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), V scores 5/9 vs WABC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.3% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$463M | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $601M | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.87x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WABC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,887 for WABC. Over the past 12 months, WABC leads with a +15.9% total return vs V's -7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WABC at 16.8% vs V's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.4% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.8% | +329.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.8% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WABC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WABC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than V's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WABC currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs V's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.22 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.93 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 190K | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
WABC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WABC as "Hold" and V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.8% upside for V (target: $362) vs 3.9% for WABC (target: $57). For income investors, WABC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 27 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.2% |
WABC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). V leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
WABC vs V: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WABC or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WABC or V?
On trailing P/E, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, Westamerica Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 12. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westamerica Bancorporation wins at 1. 05x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WABC or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -1. 1% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +329. 1% versus WABC's +54. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WABC or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus Visa Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning V is approximately 8% more volatile than WABC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WABC or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Visa Inc. grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -14. 2% for Westamerica Bancorporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WABC or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 44. 6% for Westamerica Bancorporation — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WABC leads at 60. 8% versus 60. 0% for V. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WABC leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WABC or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Visa Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 12. 8% to $362. 45.
08Which pays a better dividend — WABC or V?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).
09Is WABC or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +329. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +329. 1%, WABC: +54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WABC and V?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WABC is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.