Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WAL
Western Alliance Bancorporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.04B
5Y Perf.+115.8%
EWBC
East West Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.78B
5Y Perf.+248.9%
BOKF
BOK Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.28B
5Y Perf.+162.0%
IBOC
International Bancshares Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.56B
5Y Perf.+138.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-66.0%

WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WAL logoWAL
EWBC logoEWBC
BOKF logoBOKF
IBOC logoIBOC
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$9.04B$16.78B$10.28B$4.56B$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$5.28B$4.69B$3.36B$1.05B$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$969M$1.33B$537M$418M$382M
Gross Margin61.1%60.1%57.1%78.3%38.1%
Operating Margin22.9%37.4%19.8%49.4%17.5%
Forward P/E8.6x11.5x13.0x10.9x7.5x
Total Debt$6.48B$3.17B$4.45B$705M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$3.60B$656M$1.43B$536M$599M

WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WAL
EWBC
BOKF
IBOC
FIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Western Alliance Ba… (WAL)100215.8+115.8%
East West Bancorp, … (EWBC)100348.9+248.9%
BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF)100262.0+162.0%
International Bancs… (IBOC)100238.0+138.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10034.0-66.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BOK Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. IBOC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WAL
Western Alliance Bancorporation
The Financial Play

WAL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
EWBC
East West Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

EWBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 281.4% 10Y total return vs IBOC's 229.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
BOKF
BOK Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

BOKF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
  • +44.8% vs FIS's -35.3%
Best for: growth exposure
IBOC
International Bancshares Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBOC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
  • NIM 4.0% vs BOKF's 2.4%
  • 39.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • 3.4% ROA vs BOKF's 1.1%, ROIC 10.5% vs 4.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
  • PEG 0.31 vs BOKF's 4.38
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.53
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBOKF logoBOKF10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.53
Quality / MarginsIBOC logoIBOC39.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.76 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)BOKF logoBOKF+44.8% vs FIS's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)IBOC logoIBOC3.4% ROA vs BOKF's 1.1%, ROIC 10.5% vs 4.1%

WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WALWestern Alliance Bancorporation
FY 2025
Interchange Fees
58.7%$9M
Other Fees
41.3%$6M
EWBCEast West Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial Banking
42.5%$1.2B
Consumer and Business Banking
40.9%$1.2B
Treasury And Other
16.6%$485M
BOKFBOK Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Fees and commissions revenue
33.8%$535M
Fiduciary and Trust
14.6%$231M
Deposit Account
7.5%$119M
Transaction card revenue
6.9%$109M
Personal trust revenue
6.5%$103M
TransFund EFT network revenue
5.8%$91M
Institutional trust & retirement plan services revenue
4.2%$67M
Other (12)
20.7%$327M
IBOCInternational Bancshares Corporation
FY 2025
Services charges on deposit accounts
51.7%$74M
Other service charges, commissions and fees Banking
41.0%$59M
Other service charges, commissions and fees, Non-banking
7.3%$10M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBOCLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 10.3x IBOC's $1.1B. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricWAL logoWALWestern Alliance …EWBC logoEWBCEast West Bancorp…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.3B$4.7B$3.4B$1.1B$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.3B$2.0B$797M$417M$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$969M$1.3B$537M$418M$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.8B$1.5B$1.5B$360M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.1%+60.1%+57.1%+78.3%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.9%+37.4%+19.8%+49.4%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+28.3%+15.6%+39.1%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-52.9%+32.0%+42.6%+47.0%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.8%+21.4%+1.8%-100.0%+92.3%
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WAL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.4x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWAL logoWALWestern Alliance …EWBC logoEWBCEast West Bancorp…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$9.0B$16.8B$10.3B$4.6B$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.9B$19.3B$13.3B$4.7B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.43x12.81x16.39x11.07x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.57x11.47x13.05x10.87x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.81x0.67x5.51x0.54x2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.88x9.49x17.23x8.69x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.71x3.58x3.06x4.32x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.13x1.91x1.53x1.40x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.17x7.19x9.21x9.97x
WAL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. IBOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWAL logoWALWestern Alliance …EWBC logoEWBCEast West Bancorp…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.8%+15.8%+8.9%+13.2%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.7%+1.1%+3.4%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%+11.2%+4.1%+10.5%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.4%+3.9%+5.5%+5.4%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.82x0.36x0.80x0.22x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.9B$2.5B$3.0B$168M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3.6B$656M$1.4B$536M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6.5B$3.2B$4.5B$705M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.66x1.01x0.55x1.91x4.64x
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — WAL and EWBC and BOKF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.0% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWAL logoWALWestern Alliance …EWBC logoEWBCEast West Bancorp…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.2%+7.4%+13.0%+10.7%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.5%+42.7%+44.8%+20.1%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+218.0%+187.3%+79.4%+88.6%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.0%+68.1%+59.4%+61.3%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+166.3%+281.4%+168.5%+229.3%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+47.0%+42.2%+21.5%+23.5%-2.2%
Evenly matched — WAL and EWBC and BOKF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IBOC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWAL logoWALWestern Alliance …EWBC logoEWBCEast West Bancorp…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.72x1.22x1.03x0.83x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$97.23$127.52$139.73$75.44$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$65.81$86.58$91.35$61.15$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.7%+95.6%+95.5%+97.1%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.866.358.959.543.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M1.0M317K373K5.5M
Evenly matched — IBOC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — IBOC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WAL as "Buy", EWBC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BOKF's 1.68%.

MetricWAL logoWALWestern Alliance …EWBC logoEWBCEast West Bancorp…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$87.83$130.67$131.57$85.00$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts242421137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.0%+1.7%+1.9%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises7911161
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.69$2.40$2.24$1.40$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.8%+0.7%+0.9%+0.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — IBOC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallInternational Bancshares Co… (IBOC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.

4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.

(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 127% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.

4% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Alliance Bancorporation grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?

International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.

1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).

09

Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, WAL: +166. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WAL and EWBC and BOKF and IBOC and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (WAL (Financial Services) and EWBC (Financial Services) and BOKF (Financial Services) and IBOC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WAL is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WAL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EWBC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BOKF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBOC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WAL and EWBC and BOKF and IBOC and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WAL: 5.2% · EWBC: 4.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(WAL: 18.4% · EWBC: 28.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WAL: 9.4x · EWBC: 12.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.