Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $9.04B | $16.78B | $10.28B | $4.56B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.28B | $4.69B | $3.36B | $1.05B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $969M | $1.33B | $537M | $418M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 60.1% | 57.1% | 78.3% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 37.4% | 19.8% | 49.4% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 11.5x | 13.0x | 10.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $6.48B | $3.17B | $4.45B | $705M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.60B | $656M | $1.43B | $536M | $599M |
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 348.9 | +248.9% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EWBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 281.4% 10Y total return vs IBOC's 229.3%
BOKF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
- +44.8% vs FIS's -35.3%
IBOC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- NIM 4.0% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- 39.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 3.4% ROA vs BOKF's 1.1%, ROIC 10.5% vs 4.1%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs BOKF's 4.38
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.53
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs BOKF's 1.1%, ROIC 10.5% vs 4.1% |
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories
WAL leads 1 • EWBC leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 10.3x IBOC's $1.1B. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $4.7B | $3.4B | $1.1B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.0B | $797M | $417M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $969M | $1.3B | $537M | $418M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $360M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +60.1% | +57.1% | +78.3% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +37.4% | +19.8% | +49.4% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +28.3% | +15.6% | +39.1% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | +32.0% | +42.6% | +47.0% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +21.4% | +1.8% | -100.0% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WAL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.0B | $16.8B | $10.3B | $4.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $19.3B | $13.3B | $4.7B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.43x | 12.81x | 16.39x | 11.07x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 11.47x | 13.05x | 10.87x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 0.67x | 5.51x | 0.54x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.88x | 9.49x | 17.23x | 8.69x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 3.58x | 3.06x | 4.32x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 1.91x | 1.53x | 1.40x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.17x | 7.19x | 9.21x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. IBOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.8% | +15.8% | +8.9% | +13.2% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +3.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +11.2% | +4.1% | +10.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +3.9% | +5.5% | +5.4% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.36x | 0.80x | 0.22x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $2.5B | $3.0B | $168M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $656M | $1.4B | $536M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $3.2B | $4.5B | $705M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 1.01x | 0.55x | 1.91x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WAL and EWBC and BOKF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.0% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | +7.4% | +13.0% | +10.7% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +42.7% | +44.8% | +20.1% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.0% | +187.3% | +79.4% | +88.6% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.0% | +68.1% | +59.4% | +61.3% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.3% | +281.4% | +168.5% | +229.3% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.0% | +42.2% | +21.5% | +23.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBOC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.22x | 1.03x | 0.83x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.23 | $127.52 | $139.73 | $75.44 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.81 | $86.58 | $91.35 | $61.15 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +95.6% | +95.5% | +97.1% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 66.3 | 58.9 | 59.5 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.0M | 317K | 373K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBOC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAL as "Buy", EWBC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.83 | $130.67 | $131.57 | $85.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 24 | 21 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +1.9% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $2.40 | $2.24 | $1.40 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.
4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 127% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Alliance Bancorporation grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, WAL: +166. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAL and EWBC and BOKF and IBOC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (WAL (Financial Services) and EWBC (Financial Services) and BOKF (Financial Services) and IBOC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WAL is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.