Information Technology Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Household & Personal Products | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $3.60B | $11M | $5.89B | $2.02B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $106M | $2.37B | $674M | $2.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $126M | $-13M | $-13M | $-173M | $-171M |
| Gross Margin | 65.2% | 75.3% | 67.6% | 75.2% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | 0.2% | 1.3% | -27.2% | -7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | — | 52.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $7M | $1.26B | $290M | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $6M | $229M | $103M | $781M |
WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waystar Holding Cor… (WAY) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Mannatech, Incorpor… (MTEX) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 75.1 | -24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 38.7%, current ratio 1.41x
- Better valuation composite
- 10.9% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
MTEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44
- Beta 0.44 vs HIMS's 2.48
HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 173.7% 10Y total return vs WAY's -9.4%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs MTEX's -8.3%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TDOC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.85, current ratio 2.69x
- +2.4% vs HIMS's -53.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs MTEX's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs HIMS's 2.48 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.4% vs HIMS's -53.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs MTEX's -40.2% |
WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
HIMS leads 1 • MTEX leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • TDOC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 23.6x MTEX's $106M. WAY is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, WAY holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $106M | $2.4B | $674M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $2M | $99M | -$165M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | -$13M | -$13M | -$173M | -$171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $294M | -$1M | $76M | -$48M | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.2% | +75.3% | +67.6% | +75.2% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +0.2% | +1.3% | -27.2% | -7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -12.0% | -0.6% | -25.7% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | -1.4% | +3.2% | -7.1% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | -6.2% | +3.8% | +12.3% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.5% | +161.3% | -3.0% | -100.0% | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MTEX and TDOC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.7x trailing earnings, WAY trades at a 42% valuation discount to HIMS's 52.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTEX's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 43.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $11M | $5.9B | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $12M | $6.9B | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.74x | -0.69x | 52.59x | -14.57x | -6.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.42x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.39x | 7.22x | 43.24x | — | 15.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.27x | 0.10x | 2.51x | 3.09x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | — | 12.80x | 5.82x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.70x | — | 79.62x | — | 4.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WAY delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MTEX. WAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDOC scores 6/9 vs MTEX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | -23.8% | -2.5% | -50.8% | -12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | -40.2% | -0.6% | -16.5% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | — | +8.6% | -16.4% | -11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | -3.2% | +9.4% | -28.9% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | — | 2.34x | 0.85x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $1M | $1.0B | $187M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $6M | $229M | $103M | $781M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $7M | $1.3B | $290M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.51x | 0.99x | — | -96.80x | -8.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $20,791 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $466 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, TDOC leads with a +2.4% total return vs HIMS's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 44.0% vs TDOC's -33.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.2% | -34.1% | -19.7% | +35.5% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | -42.5% | -53.1% | -2.3% | +2.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -53.5% | +198.3% | -59.8% | -69.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -66.5% | +107.9% | -91.9% | -95.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -39.9% | +173.7% | +62.1% | -41.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.2% | -22.5% | +44.0% | -26.2% | -33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTEX and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 38.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 0.44x | 2.48x | 2.21x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.47 | $12.45 | $70.43 | $18.92 | $9.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.89 | $3.81 | $13.74 | $9.82 | $4.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.2% | +44.2% | +38.1% | +94.0% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 52.3 | 59.4 | 57.1 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 23K | 24.7M | 1.5M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAY as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", TDOC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.0% upside for WAY (target: $36) vs 0.7% for HIMS (target: $27).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.62 | — | $27.00 | $33.50 | $7.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | — | 20 | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HIMS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
WAY vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NVCR vs TDOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC?
On trailing P/E, Waystar Holding Corp.
(WAY) is the cheapest at 30. 7x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 52. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -95. 3% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +173. 7% versus TDOC's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
44β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 464% more volatile than MTEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -8. 3% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waystar Holding Corp. grew EPS 569. 2% year-over-year, compared to -706. 1% for Mannatech, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC?
Waystar Holding Corp.
(WAY) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 2% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAY leads at 24. 2% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTEX leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAY: 90.
0% to $35. 62.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WAY or MTEX or HIMS or NVCR or TDOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
44)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTEX: -39. 9%, NVCR: +62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAY and MTEX and HIMS and NVCR and TDOC?
These companies operate in different sectors (WAY (Technology) and MTEX (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.