Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.73B | $317M | $374.00B | $87.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.38B | $2.72B | $45.18B | $17.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-412M | $156M | $10.98B | $2.72B |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 11.1% | 48.5% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -2.6% | 29.5% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $670M | $14.46B | $2.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $582M | $452M | $9.03B | $5.26B |
WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBTOON Entertainme… (WBTN) | 100 | 57.9 | -42.1% |
| fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
| Spotify Technology … (SPOT) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBTN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +42.7% vs FUBO's -65.6%
FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
- 67.7% revenue growth vs WBTN's 2.5%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs SPOT's 186.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
SPOT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.7% revenue growth vs WBTN's 2.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBTN's -29.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs WBTN's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs FUBO's -65.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBTN's -21.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs -5.1% |
WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
FUBO leads 1 • SPOT leads 1 • WBTN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 32.7x WBTN's $1.4B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBTN's -29.8%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $2.7B | $45.2B | $17.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$14M | $30.1B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$412M | $156M | $11.0B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$81M | $9.5B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +11.1% | +48.5% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -2.6% | +29.5% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.8% | +5.7% | +24.3% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -3.0% | +20.9% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +2.5% | +17.6% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +81.8% | +31.1% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.6x trailing earnings, SPOT trades at a 1% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPOT's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $317M | $374.0B | $88.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $534M | $379.4B | $84.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.97x | -44.88x | 34.89x | 34.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.80x | 32.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 12.61x | 31.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 0.12x | 8.28x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 0.12x | 14.32x | 9.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 480.10x | — | 39.53x | 26.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-28 for WBTN. WBTN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs WBTN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | +16.2% | +41.3% | +35.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.9% | +8.1% | +19.8% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | -3.3% | +29.8% | +40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | -4.1% | +30.5% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.25x | 0.54x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$558M | $218M | $5.4B | -$2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $582M | $452M | $9.0B | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $670M | $14.5B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -730.78x | 10.35x | 17.33x | 84.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOT five years ago would be worth $17,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, WBTN leads with a +42.7% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOT at 43.5% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -65.3% | -3.0% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.7% | -65.6% | -23.6% | -35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -51.7% | +166.5% | +195.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -94.8% | +75.2% | +78.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -90.3% | +875.3% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | -21.6% | +38.6% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBTN's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.77x | 0.39x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.47 | $56.64 | $134.12 | $785.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.83 | $2.48 | $75.01 | $405.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +19.0% | +65.8% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.6 | 38.0 | 35.3 | 32.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 342K | 1.9M | 44.0M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBTN as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", SPOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs 6.0% for WBTN (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $43.00 | $116.29 | $630.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 99 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
WBTN vs FUBO vs NFLX vs SPOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock (WBTN). Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) offers the better valuation at 34. 6x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock (WBTN) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT?
On trailing P/E, Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the cheapest at 34. 6x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT?
Over the past 5 years, Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) delivered a total return of +78. 5%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock's 2. 10β — meaning WBTN is approximately 438% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock (WBTN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus 2. 5% for WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock (WBTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: fuboTV Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -119. 8% for WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -29. 3% for WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -4. 1% for WBTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Spotify Technology S. A. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WBTN or FUBO or NFLX or SPOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock (WBTN) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, WBTN: -42. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBTN and FUBO and NFLX and SPOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBTN (Technology) and FUBO (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and SPOT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBTN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; SPOT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.