Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1M | $53.62B | $340.44B | $46.46B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77M | $21.04B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $1.43B | $123.35B | $32.20B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 5.2% | 44.9% | 41.2% | 12.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -20.0% | 8.2% | 10.9% | 1.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.5x | 4.2x | 1.4x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $4.12B | $248.49B | $89.77B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $2.41B | $181.73B | $108.35B | $86.81B |
WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. O… (WBUY) | 100 | 27.3 | -72.7% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 208.0 | +108.0% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 169.7 | +69.7% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 118.5 | +18.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 204.9 | +104.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, WBUY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 28.8% revenue growth vs WBUY's -67.7%
BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.05 vs AMZN's 1.24
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.05 vs 1.24
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs BABA's 83.4%
- 12.2% margin vs WBUY's -15.6%
- +43.7% vs WBUY's -59.5%
- 11.5% ROA vs WBUY's -57.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -104.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% revenue growth vs WBUY's -67.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.05 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs WBUY's -15.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs WBUY's 1.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs WBUY's -59.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs WBUY's -57.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -104.7% |
WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories
JD leads 1 • WBUY leads 0 • SE leads 0 • BABA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 16902.0x WBUY's $77M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBUY's -15.6%. On growth, SE holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77M | $21.0B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $2.0B | $114.6B | $23.8B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $1.4B | $123.4B | $32.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $3.9B | $2.6B | $9.1B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +44.9% | +41.2% | +12.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.0% | +8.2% | +10.9% | +1.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | +6.8% | +12.2% | +2.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +18.5% | +0.3% | +0.7% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.8% | +38.3% | +4.8% | +14.9% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.8% | +126.9% | -52.0% | -56.3% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, JD trades at a 94% valuation discount to SE's 121.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JD offers better value at 0.29x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $53.6B | $340.4B | $46.5B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $624,185 | $55.3B | $350.3B | $43.7B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.21x | 121.47x | 17.90x | 7.64x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.52x | 4.16x | 1.43x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.29x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 52.61x | 13.55x | 6.40x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 3.19x | 2.33x | 0.27x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 6.32x | 2.12x | 1.01x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.14x | 29.64x | 7.14x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-3 for WBUY. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBUY's 0.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs WBUY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | +15.2% | +11.2% | +10.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.5% | +5.8% | +6.7% | +4.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.7% | +5.4% | +9.6% | +9.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -103.3% | +6.0% | +10.4% | +10.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.73x | 0.49x | 0.23x | 0.29x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$666,085 | $1.7B | $66.8B | -$18.6B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $2.4B | $181.7B | $108.3B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $4.1B | $248.5B | $89.8B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.78x | 49.70x | 15.74x | 12.85x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,322 for WBUY. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs WBUY's -59.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs WBUY's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | -32.6% | -9.5% | +5.7% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.5% | -37.8% | +16.0% | -7.7% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +5.1% | +74.8% | -8.2% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | -63.1% | -35.4% | -53.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +455.5% | +83.4% | +48.7% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | +1.7% | +20.5% | -2.8% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JD and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBUY's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs WBUY's 4.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.46x | 1.23x | 1.04x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.85 | $199.30 | $192.67 | $38.08 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $77.05 | $103.71 | $24.51 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.3% | +44.5% | +73.2% | +79.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 57.1 | 61.8 | 58.0 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 4.8M | 10.4M | 10.1M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BABA and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SE as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.5% upside for SE (target: $148) vs 8.8% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs BABA's 1.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $147.67 | $194.23 | $32.86 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 59 | 45 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | $5.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | +8.2% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WBUY vs SE vs BABA vs JD vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sea Limited (SE) is the stronger pick with 28.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 7% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares (WBUY). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Sea Limited at 121. 5x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JD. com, Inc. wins at 0. 05x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -76. 8% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares (WBUY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus WBUY's -76. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning AMZN is approximately 44% more volatile than JD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 73% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sea Limited (SE) is pulling ahead at 28.
8% versus -67. 7% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares (WBUY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -44. 9% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus -35. 1% for WBUY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JD. com, Inc. (JD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 05x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JD. com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 66. 5% to $147. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. WBUY, SE, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBUY or SE or BABA or JD or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 4%, WBUY: -76. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBUY and SE and BABA and JD and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WBUY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while WBUY, SE, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.