Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Entertainment
Semiconductors
Internet Content & Information
WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Semiconductors | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $595M | $310M | $481M | $3.92B | $142M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98B | $2.97B | $6.11B | $901M | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $447M | $103M | $-153M | $94M | $-202M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 62.2% | 12.7% | 44.4% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | -7.8% | -3.4% | 12.1% | -7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | — | 3.8x | 30.8x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $244M | $19M | $49M | $303M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $986M | $4.00B | $1.19B | $766M | $1.02B |
WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| Zhihu Inc. (ZH) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 236.3 | +136.3% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WDH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 132.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.7%
- 15.0% margin vs DOYU's -4.8%
- 7.0% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC 3.1% vs -15.4%
Among these 5 stocks, ZH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HUYA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 4.3x)
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs HUYA's -60.1%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
- 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs DOYU's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +195.6% vs DOYU's -34.2%
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10 vs ACMR's 3.24, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs DOYU's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs ACMR's 3.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs DOYU's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.6% vs DOYU's -34.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC 3.1% vs -15.4% |
WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WDH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • ZH leads 0 • HUYA leads 0 • DOYU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 6.8x ACMR's $901M. WDH is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOYU's -4.8%. On growth, WDH holds the edge at +23.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $3.0B | $6.1B | $901M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $253M | -$148M | -$120M | $126M | -$275M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $447M | $103M | -$153M | $94M | -$202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $0 | -$69M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +62.2% | +12.7% | +44.4% | +9.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | -7.8% | -3.4% | +12.1% | -7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +3.5% | -2.5% | +10.4% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -7.8% | -1.9% | -7.6% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.9% | -20.3% | +1.7% | +9.4% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -4.2% | -118.5% | -76.1% | +179.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HUYA and DOYU each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, WDH trades at a 75% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDH's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $595M | $310M | $481M | $3.9B | $142M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $486M | -$275M | $314M | $3.5B | -$5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.89x | -12.20x | -103.70x | 43.21x | -3.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.56x | — | 3.84x | 30.81x | 4.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.22x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.25x | — | — | 27.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 0.58x | 0.54x | 4.35x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 0.50x | 0.67x | 2.06x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.51x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDH leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDH delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DOYU. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACMR's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDH scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +2.5% | -2.4% | +6.1% | -6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +1.9% | -1.7% | +3.9% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | -25.6% | -1.7% | +7.0% | -15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | -10.8% | -2.1% | +6.6% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$742M | -$4.0B | -$1.1B | -$463M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $986M | $4.0B | $1.2B | $766M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $244M | $19M | $49M | $303M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 20.44x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $693 for ZH. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs DOYU's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs ZH's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.5% | +1.8% | +5.6% | +31.9% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.8% | -15.1% | +26.9% | +195.6% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.6% | -46.2% | +99.7% | +487.9% | +125.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -93.1% | -60.8% | +133.4% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -93.4% | -60.1% | +3065.8% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.9% | -18.7% | +25.9% | +80.5% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACMR and DOYU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOYU is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs DOYU's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.24x | 1.19x | 3.17x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.18 | $5.55 | $4.93 | $71.65 | $9.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.24 | $2.57 | $2.21 | $19.26 | $4.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +61.1% | +64.9% | +82.6% | +50.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.8 | 49.5 | 54.2 | 60.7 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 207K | 444K | 1.0M | 1.2M | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and DOYU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WDH as "Buy", ZH as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 6.2% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | — | $3.40 | $75.00 | $9.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 8 | 15 | 10 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | — | +56.7% | +0.2% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | — | $12.34 | $0.11 | $68.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +19.0% | +7.6% | +0.2% | +10.9% |
WDH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
WDH vs ZH vs HUYA vs ACMR vs DOYU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU?
On trailing P/E, Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, HUYA Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -93. 1% for Zhihu Inc. (ZH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus ZH's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning ACMR is approximately 183% more volatile than DOYU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for ACM Research, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waterdrop Inc. grew EPS 132. 6% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU?
Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 3% net margin versus -7. 0% for DouYu International Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -13. 4% for ZH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZH leads at 60. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for ACM Research, Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), WDH (3. 9% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ZH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WDH or ZH or HUYA or ACMR or DOYU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 100. 0% yield). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOYU: -78. 8%, ACMR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WDH and ZH and HUYA and ACMR and DOYU?
These companies operate in different sectors (WDH (Financial Services) and ZH (Communication Services) and HUYA (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology) and DOYU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WDH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ZH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock. WDH, HUYA, DOYU pay a dividend while ZH, ACMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.