Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $21M | $975M | $2.33B | $760M | $33M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $803M | $475M | $592M | $81M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.53T | $28M | $43M | $26M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | 26.6% | 63.4% | 25.3% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | 5.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.4x | 22.1x | 26.9x | 22.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $17M | $180M | $67M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $128M | $22M | $3M | $6M |
WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wetouch Technology … (WETH) | 100 | 25.4 | -74.6% |
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 484.2 | +384.2% |
| Digi International … (DGII) | 100 | 591.0 | +491.0% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 400.0 | +300.0% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 20.7% margin vs OESX's -5.6%
- 18K% ROA vs OESX's -0.0%, ROIC 36.3% vs -34.8%
Among these 5 stocks, DAKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DGII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 463.4% 10Y total return vs DAKT's 156.0%
- PEG 0.87 vs LYTS's 1.32
- +121.0% vs OESX's +31.2%
LYTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0%
- 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
OESX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs WETH's 1.62
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs OESX's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs WETH's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.0% vs OESX's +31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18K% ROA vs OESX's -0.0%, ROIC 36.3% vs -34.8% |
WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WETH leads in 2 of 6 categories
DAKT leads 1 • DGII leads 1 • LYTS leads 1 • OESX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 19.2x WETH's $42M. WETH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OESX's -5.6%. On growth, WETH holds the edge at +999999.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $803M | $475M | $592M | $81M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.59T | $65M | $90M | $51M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.53T | $28M | $43M | $26M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $62M | $130M | $38M | $348M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +26.6% | +63.4% | +25.3% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +5.6% | +13.2% | +6.5% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +3.4% | +9.1% | +4.3% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +7.7% | +27.4% | +6.4% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +999999.0% | +21.6% | +25.1% | -0.5% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +117.0% | +3.6% | +11.1% | +109.6% |
Valuation Metrics
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.4x trailing earnings, WETH trades at a 94% valuation discount to DGII's 57.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LYTS offers better value at 1.82x vs DGII's 1.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $975M | $2.3B | $760M | $33M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$81M | $865M | $2.5B | $823M | $37M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.44x | -95.29x | 57.44x | 30.91x | -2.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.08x | 26.89x | 22.46x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.85x | 1.82x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -8.72x | 16.42x | 27.60x | 17.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 1.29x | 5.42x | 1.33x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 3.50x | 3.68x | 3.26x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.91x | 12.47x | 22.15x | 21.94x | 66.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WETH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WETH delivers a 18696.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18697 in annual profit, vs $-0 for OESX. WETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OESX's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DGII scores 5/9 vs OESX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18696.9% | +9.6% | +6.7% | +10.9% | -0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18063.3% | +5.1% | +4.8% | +6.5% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.3% | +13.2% | +5.7% | +9.5% | -34.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +9.9% | +7.3% | +12.6% | -34.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.28x | 0.29x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$103M | -$111M | $158M | $63M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $128M | $22M | $3M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $17M | $180M | $67M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.96x | 37.31x | 21.93x | 13.52x | -3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DGII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DGII five years ago would be worth $34,712 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $330 for WETH. Over the past 12 months, DGII leads with a +121.0% total return vs OESX's +31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 57.8% vs WETH's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.1% | +0.9% | +43.7% | +32.8% | -38.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.8% | +46.7% | +121.0% | +58.0% | +31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.6% | +293.1% | +98.5% | +100.0% | -38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | +208.3% | +247.1% | +223.4% | -83.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +156.0% | +463.4% | +108.5% | -32.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.9% | +57.8% | +25.7% | +26.0% | -15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYTS and OESX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WETH's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs WETH's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.49x | 1.35x | 1.40x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.68 | $28.27 | $69.81 | $24.75 | $18.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $13.05 | $27.71 | $15.31 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.6% | +70.8% | +88.9% | +98.7% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 52.2 | 69.3 | 70.1 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 449K | 268K | 378K | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
LYTS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", DGII as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs 10.0% for DGII (target: $68). LYTS is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $68.25 | $27.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 18 | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
WETH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DAKT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WETH vs DAKT vs DGII vs LYTS vs OESX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) offers the better valuation at 3. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX?
On trailing P/E, Wetouch Technology Inc.
(WETH) is the cheapest at 3. 4x versus Digi International Inc. at 57. 4x. On forward P/E, Daktronics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Digi International Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX?
Over the past 5 years, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) delivered a total return of +247. 1%, compared to -96. 7% for Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DGII returned +497. 5% versus OESX's -27. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Wetouch Technology Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning WETH is approximately 58% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 87% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digi International Inc. grew EPS 77. 0% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX?
Wetouch Technology Inc.
(WETH) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -14. 8% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WETH leads at 22. 0% versus -13. 3% for OESX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DGII leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Digi International Inc. (DGII) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) trades at 22. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Digi International Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 10. 6% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX?
In this comparison, LYTS (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. WETH, DAKT, DGII, OESX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WETH or DAKT or DGII or LYTS or OESX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +109. 6% 10Y return). Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYTS: +109. 6%, WETH: +105. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WETH and DAKT and DGII and LYTS and OESX?
These companies operate in different sectors (WETH (Real Estate) and DAKT (Technology) and DGII (Technology) and LYTS (Technology) and OESX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DGII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LYTS pays a dividend while WETH, DAKT, DGII, OESX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.