Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $3.90B | $1.84T | $1.89B | $63.00B | $79.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $1M | $1.40B | $27.89B | $35.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $-498M | $22M | $3.12B | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | -8.7% | 18.2% | 23.6% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | -367.6% | 2.3% | 25.3% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 7.5x | 41.7x | 26.5x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $0.00 | $374M | $7.14B | $12.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $495M | $98M | $18M | $3.71B | $3.04B |
WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cactus, Inc. (WHD) | 100 | 188.4 | +88.4% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 348.2 | +248.2% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 316.4 | +216.4% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 196.1 | +96.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs WHD's -4.5%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 26.5x)
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +134.2% vs SOC's -36.8%
BKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs WHD's 191.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 37.6%, current ratio 1.36x
- 11.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
SLB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.87, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs WHD's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.2% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs -44.6% |
WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WHD leads in 1 of 6 categories
BKR leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • WTTR leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WHD and BKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 28095.2x SOC's $1M. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, WHD holds the edge at +38.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1M | $1.4B | $27.9B | $35.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292M | -$454M | $217M | $4.5B | $7.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | -$498M | $22M | $3.1B | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $314M | -$611M | -$95M | $2.6B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | -8.7% | +18.2% | +23.6% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | -367.6% | +2.3% | +25.3% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -391.5% | +1.5% | +11.2% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | -480.4% | -6.8% | +9.4% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | — | -2.3% | +2.5% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -5.4% | -4.4% | +132.5% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOC and WTTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 73% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHD's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $1.84T | $1.9B | $63.0B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $1.84T | $2.2B | $66.4B | $88.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.30x | -3.07x | 84.10x | 24.43x | 22.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.28x | 7.50x | 41.66x | 26.48x | 19.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.85x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.15x | — | 10.70x | 14.00x | 12.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.61x | — | 1.34x | 2.27x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 2359.43x | 1.88x | 3.32x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.95x | — | — | 24.83x | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. WHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLB's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WHD scores 7/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | -113.8% | +2.2% | +16.1% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | -28.9% | +1.3% | +7.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.4% | -44.6% | +2.3% | +12.7% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.3% | -37.5% | +2.9% | +13.6% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.40x | 0.38x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$457M | -$98M | $356M | $3.4B | $9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $495M | $98M | $18M | $3.7B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $0 | $374M | $7.1B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 60.94x | -2.28x | 1.54x | 9.68x | 9.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKR five years ago would be worth $27,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +134.2% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 33.1% vs SLB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.7% | +9.5% | +52.9% | +35.7% | +32.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.6% | -36.8% | +134.2% | +77.5% | +61.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +26.5% | +135.9% | +136.0% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +32.6% | +158.4% | +175.3% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.7% | +32.4% | +26.6% | +186.8% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.6% | +8.2% | +33.1% | +33.1% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WHD and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKR is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WHD currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.51x | 1.09x | 0.83x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.25 | $35.00 | $17.95 | $70.41 | $57.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.20 | $3.72 | $7.20 | $35.83 | $31.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +36.7% | +93.7% | +90.2% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 45.8 | 69.4 | 57.1 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 941K | 5.4M | 1.7M | 9.1M | 16.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WHD and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WHD as "Hold", SOC as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", BKR as "Buy", SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs WHD's 1.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | $27.00 | $16.00 | $72.00 | $56.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 4 | 14 | 45 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | +1.9% | +1.4% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | — | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.77 | — | $0.32 | $0.92 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.6% | +3.0% |
WHD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BKR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
WHD vs SOC vs WTTR vs BKR vs SLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Cactus, Inc. (WHD). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB?
Over the past 5 years, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) delivered a total return of +175.
3%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WHD returned +191. 7% versus SLB's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 82% more volatile than BKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cactus, Inc. (WHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 45% for SLB N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -4. 5% for Cactus, Inc. (WHD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WHD leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB?
Cactus, Inc.
(WHD) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 4% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHD leads at 23. 2% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WHD leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB?
In this comparison, SLB (2.
0% yield), WTTR (1. 9% yield), BKR (1. 4% yield), WHD (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WHD or SOC or WTTR or BKR or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +186. 8% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKR: +186. 8%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHD and SOC and WTTR and BKR and SLB?
These companies operate in different sectors (WHD (Energy) and SOC (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and BKR (Energy) and SLB (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WHD, WTTR, BKR, SLB pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.