Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Specialty Retail
WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $489M | $730M | $913M | $2.40B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $598M | $1.61B | $1.14B | $3.16B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $95M | $90M | $70M | $171M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 12.6% | 19.1% | 32.2% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 7.9% | 8.9% | 8.2% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 74.5x | 10.7x | 13.5x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $375M | $102M | $1.44B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $43M | $585K | $882M | $10.73B |
WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. Willi-Food Inter… (WILC) | 100 | 247.4 | +147.4% |
| Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA) | 100 | 384.1 | +284.1% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WILC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- PEG 3.74 vs JBSS's 7.58
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 3.74 vs 4.06
- 15.8% margin vs WMT's 3.3%
SENEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 59.2%, current ratio 3.52x
- 8.2% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2%
JBSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 2.7% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CENT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs WILC's 9.5%
- Beta 0.12, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs WILC's 0.83
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 3.74 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs WILC's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs CENT's +11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs CENT's 4.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 9.1% |
WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SENEA leads in 2 of 6 categories
WILC leads 1 • JBSS leads 0 • CENT leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WILC and SENEA and CENT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 1174.8x WILC's $598M. WILC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $598M | $1.6B | $1.1B | $3.2B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $82M | $171M | $127M | $302M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $95M | $90M | $70M | $171M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $168M | $33M | $282M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +12.6% | +19.1% | +32.2% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +7.9% | +8.9% | +8.2% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +5.6% | +6.2% | +5.4% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +10.5% | +2.9% | +8.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.0% | +1.1% | +4.6% | +8.7% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.0% | +2.1% | +31.9% | +30.6% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SENEA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WILC offers better value at 3.74x vs SENEA's 21.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $489M | $730M | $913M | $2.4B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $448M | $1.1B | $1.0B | $3.0B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.14x | 23.74x | 15.53x | 15.11x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 74.51x | 10.68x | 13.55x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.74x | 21.17x | 11.02x | 5.04x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.97x | 8.66x | 8.73x | 8.45x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 0.46x | 0.82x | 0.77x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.31x | 1.54x | 2.54x | 1.55x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.45x | — | 8.25x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WILC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $11 for CENT. WILC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CENT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +12.6% | +19.5% | +10.7% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.3% | +7.4% | +11.7% | +4.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +5.3% | +15.2% | +9.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +7.1% | +20.4% | +8.7% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.59x | 0.28x | 0.91x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | $332M | $102M | $558M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $43M | $585,000 | $882M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $375M | $102M | $1.4B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 67.29x | 6.90x | 26.02x | 1200.51x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SENEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,277 for CENT. Over the past 12 months, WILC leads with a +136.3% total return vs CENT's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.1% vs JBSS's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +29.4% | +14.1% | +20.6% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +136.3% | +56.4% | +39.3% | +11.8% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.3% | +193.1% | -22.9% | +30.9% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.8% | +185.2% | +4.0% | -17.2% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +951.8% | +315.4% | +101.1% | +161.6% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.0% | +43.1% | -8.3% | +9.4% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WILC and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WILC's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WILC currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs SENEA's 83.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.22x | 0.31x | 0.65x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.00 | $167.33 | $85.15 | $41.30 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.20 | $85.20 | $58.47 | $28.77 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +83.7% | +91.7% | +93.3% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.5 | 50.0 | 49.2 | 47.2 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 106K | 80K | 74K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JBSS and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBSS as "Buy", CENT as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, JBSS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.67% vs WILC's 0.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $51.00 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | 10 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.0% | +2.7% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $0.00 | $2.08 | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% | +6.5% | +0.8% |
SENEA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). WILC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
WILC vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CENT vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -17. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WILC returned +951. 8% versus JBSS's +101. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. 's 0. 83β — meaning WILC is approximately 614% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for Central Garden & Pet Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -31. 1% for Seneca Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WILC leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT?
G.
Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 2. 6% for Seneca Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WILC leads at 9. 5% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CENT leads at 31. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 74. 5x for Seneca Foods Corporation — 63. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 32. 4% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT?
In this comparison, JBSS (2.
7% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield), WILC (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SENEA, CENT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WILC or SENEA or JBSS or CENT or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, CENT: +161. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WILC and SENEA and JBSS and CENT and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WILC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WILC, JBSS, WMT pay a dividend while SENEA, CENT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.