Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WMB vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
WMB vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $89.22B | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.92B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.84B | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 31.2x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $29.36B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $10.68B |
WMB vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 357.1 | +257.1% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMB vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
- 371.1% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.15, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 31.2x)
- Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 195.8%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 31.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 195.8%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs WMB's +27.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs WMB's 4.9%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.7% |
WMB vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMB vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 27.2x WMB's $11.9B. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.9B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.8B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.8B | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $722M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.6% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XOM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 36% valuation discount to WMB's 34.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMB's 17.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89.2B | $620.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $118.5B | $653.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.09x | 21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.23x | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.56x | 10.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.47x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.94x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 88.77x | 26.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMB delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMB's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMB scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.96x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.3B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.4B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.37x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMB five years ago would be worth $32,449 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,464 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs WMB's +27.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMB at 38.6% vs XOM's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.7% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.3% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +224.5% | +164.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +371.1% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMB and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMB's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMB currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.41 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.82 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.8M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMB and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WMB as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs 8.3% for WMB (target: $79). For income investors, WMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.74% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.00 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
WMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). XOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
WMB vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMB or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMB or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMB or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) delivered a total return of +224. 5%, compared to +164. 6% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +371. 1% versus XOM's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMB or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning WMB is approximately -217% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMB or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Williams Companies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMB or XOM?
The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMB leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMB or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 14.
8x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 9. 5% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMB or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is WMB or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, WMB: +371. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMB and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.