Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.75B | $648M | $1.63B | $31.59B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.01B | $2.39B | $5.40B | $16.98B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $57M | $104M | $650M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 28.0% | 24.5% | 23.9% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 3.0% | 6.4% | 6.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 11.5x | 19.5x | 47.1x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $172M | $341M | $544M | $2.96B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $111M | $366M | $327M | $10.73B |
WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Village Super Marke… (VLGEA) | 100 | 183.6 | +83.6% |
| Ingles Markets, Inc… (IMKTA) | 100 | 201.3 | +101.3% |
| Casey's General Sto… (CASY) | 100 | 532.7 | +432.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 0.06, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 0.06 vs IMKTA's 0.36, lower leverage
VLGEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.66 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.66 vs 4.06
- 2.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%
IMKTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CASY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs WMT's 499.5%
- 7.3% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4%
- 3.8% margin vs IMKTA's 1.9%
Among these 5 stocks, WMT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.66 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs IMKTA's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs IMKTA's 0.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.1% vs WMK's -18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs IMKTA's 4.1%, ROIC 11.3% vs 5.0% |
WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VLGEA leads in 1 of 6 categories
WMK leads 1 • CASY leads 1 • IMKTA leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VLGEA and IMKTA and CASY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 294.6x VLGEA's $2.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (CASY) to 1.9% (IMKTA). On growth, VLGEA holds the edge at +6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $2.4B | $5.4B | $17.0B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $108M | $34.7B | $1.5B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $57M | $104M | $650M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $62M | $69.3B | $667M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +28.0% | +24.5% | +23.9% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +3.0% | +6.4% | +6.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +2.4% | +1.9% | +3.8% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +2.6% | +12.8% | +3.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +6.9% | -1.8% | +0.3% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | +6.1% | +35.0% | +49.8% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VLGEA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, VLGEA trades at a 80% valuation discount to CASY's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VLGEA offers better value at 0.66x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $648M | $1.6B | $31.6B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $878M | $1.8B | $34.2B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.37x | 11.50x | 19.50x | 58.13x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.93x | — | — | 47.05x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.66x | — | 3.73x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.94x | 8.07x | 7.51x | 28.51x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.28x | 0.31x | 1.98x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 1.32x | 1.01x | 9.06x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 362.58x | 18.82x | 41.15x | 54.03x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMK leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CASY delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $6 for IMKTA. WMK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CASY's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMKTA scores 7/9 vs WMK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +11.4% | +6.4% | +23.7% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +5.6% | +4.1% | +10.0% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +7.6% | +5.0% | +11.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +8.8% | +5.3% | +12.5% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.69x | 0.34x | 0.84x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $55M | $230M | $177M | $2.6B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $111M | $366M | $327M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $172M | $341M | $544M | $3.0B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 15.89x | 6.36x | 13.45x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASY five years ago would be worth $38,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,557 for IMKTA. Over the past 12 months, CASY leads with a +83.1% total return vs WMK's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.0% vs WMK's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +27.4% | +23.6% | +53.2% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.3% | +22.3% | +41.6% | +83.1% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +122.1% | +7.6% | +272.4% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +93.8% | +35.6% | +285.1% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | +111.9% | +125.9% | +638.3% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +30.5% | +2.5% | +55.0% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMK and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMKTA's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs WMK's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.07x | 0.36x | 0.29x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.23 | $45.12 | $95.62 | $867.40 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.13 | $30.08 | $59.09 | $430.00 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +97.4% | +89.7% | +98.1% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 55.1 | 46.6 | 76.8 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 49K | 128K | 545K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VLGEA and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CASY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.3% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs -19.1% for CASY (target: $688). For income investors, VLGEA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs CASY's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $688.10 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 25 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.1% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 11 | 19 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $0.90 | $0.65 | $1.94 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.8% |
VLGEA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). WMK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
WMK vs VLGEA vs IMKTA vs CASY vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, Weis Markets, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Casey's General Stores, Inc. wins at 3. 02x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) delivered a total return of +285. 1%, compared to +35. 6% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CASY returned +638. 3% versus WMK's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weis Markets, Inc.
(WMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Ingles Markets, Incorporated's 0. 36β — meaning IMKTA is approximately 513% more volatile than WMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 84% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CASY leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT?
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 1. 6% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CASY leads at 5. 0% versus 2. 1% for WMK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VLGEA leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 02x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 47. 1x for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — 38. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 3% to $137. 04.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).
09Is WMK or VLGEA or IMKTA or CASY or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, CASY: +638. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMK and VLGEA and IMKTA and CASY and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (WMK (Consumer Defensive) and VLGEA (Consumer Defensive) and IMKTA (Consumer Defensive) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WMK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VLGEA is a small-cap deep-value stock; IMKTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMK, VLGEA, IMKTA, WMT pay a dividend while CASY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.