Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELME

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WNC
Wabash National Corporation

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-18.3%
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corporation

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.71B
5Y Perf.+969.6%
GNSS
Genasys Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$90M
5Y Perf.-56.3%
THR
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.15B
5Y Perf.+307.5%
ELME
Elme Communities

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$188M
5Y Perf.-90.3%

WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELME — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WNC logoWNC
WLFC logoWLFC
GNSS logoGNSS
THR logoTHR
ELME logoELME
IndustryAgricultural - MachineryRental & Leasing ServicesHardware, Equipment & PartsIndustrial - MachineryREIT - Office
Market Cap$317M$1.71B$90M$2.15B$188M
Revenue (TTM)$1.47B$763M$51M$522M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-65M$121M$-15M$59M$-154M
Gross Margin2.0%53.9%43.2%44.8%
Operating Margin-3.1%20.4%-22.1%15.9%
Forward P/E1.5x16.3x30.8x
Total Debt$443M$2.71B$21M$152M$520M
Cash & Equiv.$32M$16M$8M$40M$1.33B

WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELMELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WNC
WLFC
GNSS
THR
ELME
StockMay 20May 26Return
Wabash National Cor… (WNC)10081.7-18.3%
Willis Lease Financ… (WLFC)1001069.6+969.6%
Genasys Inc. (GNSS)10043.7-56.3%
Thermon Group Holdi… (THR)100407.5+307.5%
Elme Communities (ELME)1009.7-90.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELME

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: THR and ELME are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Elme Communities is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. WNC, WLFC, and GNSS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WNC
Wabash National Corporation
The Value Play

WNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (1.5x vs 30.8x)
Best for: value
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

WLFC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs THR's 251.9%
  • PEG 0.23 vs THR's 0.90
  • 15.8% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
GNSS
Genasys Inc.
The Growth Play

GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
  • 69.8% revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
THR
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

THR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 2.43x
  • +136.2% vs WNC's +0.4%
  • 7.2% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 9.8% vs -56.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ELME
Elme Communities
The Real Estate Income Play

ELME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
  • Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.47 vs WNC's 1.93
  • 34.1% yield, vs WLFC's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGNSS logoGNSS69.8% revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
ValueWNC logoWNCLower P/E (1.5x vs 30.8x)
Quality / MarginsWLFC logoWLFC15.8% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
Stability / SafetyELME logoELMEBeta 0.47 vs WNC's 1.93
DividendsELME logoELME34.1% yield, vs WLFC's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)THR logoTHR+136.2% vs WNC's +0.4%
Efficiency (ROA)THR logoTHR7.2% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 9.8% vs -56.7%

WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WNCWabash National Corporation
FY 2025
New Trailers
65.4%$1.0B
Equipment and Other
26.1%$403M
Components, Parts and Services
8.3%$127M
Used Trailers
0.3%$5M
WLFCWillis Lease Finance Corporation
FY 2024
Spare Parts And Equipment Sales
44.9%$27M
Maintenance Services
40.0%$24M
Managed Services And Other Revenue
15.0%$9M
GNSSGenasys Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$181,000
THRThermon Group Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
United States Segment
100.0%$270M
ELMEElme Communities
FY 2024
Residential Segment
100.0%$224M

WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELME — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWLFCLAGGINGELME

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WLFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WNC and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. WLFC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWNC logoWNCWabash National C…WLFC logoWLFCWillis Lease Fina…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.THR logoTHRThermon Group Hol…ELME logoELMEElme Communities
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.5B$763M$51M$522M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$273M-$9M$106M-$44M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$65M$121M-$15M$59M-$154M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$38M-$277M-$3M$55M$62M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.0%+53.9%+43.2%+44.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.1%+20.4%-22.1%+15.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.4%+15.8%-29.2%+11.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.6%-36.2%-5.3%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.4%+23.2%+145.9%+9.6%-4.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-120.7%+57.9%+78.0%+1.9%-6.6%
WLFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — WNC and WLFC and ELME each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 96% valuation discount to THR's 41.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WLFC offers better value at 0.21x vs THR's 1.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWNC logoWNCWabash National C…WLFC logoWLFCWillis Lease Fina…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.THR logoTHRThermon Group Hol…ELME logoELMEElme Communities
Market CapShares × price$317M$1.7B$90M$2.1B$188M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$728M$4.4B$104M$2.3B-$624M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.54x14.65x-5.00x41.61x-1.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.27x30.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.21x1.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.92x13.38x22.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.21x2.54x2.22x4.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.88x2.18x41.58x4.49x0.78x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.58x3.03x
Evenly matched — WNC and WLFC and ELME each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

THR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

WLFC delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. THR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), THR scores 7/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWNC logoWNCWabash National C…WLFC logoWLFCWillis Lease Fina…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.THR logoTHRThermon Group Hol…ELME logoELMEElme Communities
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-17.3%+17.1%-8.2%+10.9%-18.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.0%+3.2%-22.0%+7.2%-8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+37.4%+5.3%-56.7%+9.8%-15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+32.6%+6.2%-68.2%+12.3%-10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944374
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.20x3.74x9.85x0.31x2.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$411M$2.7B$13M$112M-$812M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$16M$8M$40M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$443M$2.7B$21M$152M$520M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.97x1.79x-31.66x10.25x-3.82x
THR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WLFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WLFC five years ago would be worth $54,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, THR leads with a +136.2% total return vs WNC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WLFC at 64.4% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWNC logoWNCWabash National C…WLFC logoWLFCWillis Lease Fina…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.THR logoTHRThermon Group Hol…ELME logoELMEElme Communities
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.0%+68.4%-8.3%+73.6%-4.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.4%+68.2%+2.6%+136.2%+8.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.9%+344.6%-31.3%+209.1%+13.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.5%+440.7%-66.7%+228.9%-15.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.6%+879.9%+14.9%+251.9%-11.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.8%+64.4%-11.8%+45.7%+4.2%
WLFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WLFC and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ELME is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLFC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWNC logoWNCWabash National C…WLFC logoWLFCWillis Lease Fina…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.THR logoTHRThermon Group Hol…ELME logoELMEElme Communities
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.93x1.66x0.87x1.49x0.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.94$239.44$2.70$71.24$17.68
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.10$114.01$1.40$23.86$1.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.3%+94.2%+74.1%+91.7%+12.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.775.659.977.250.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded598K76K95K553K1.2M
Evenly matched — WLFC and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — THR and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WNC as "Hold", WLFC as "Buy", THR as "Buy", ELME as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -12.7% for THR (target: $57). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs WLFC's 0.36%.

MetricWNC logoWNCWabash National C…WLFC logoWLFCWillis Lease Fina…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.THR logoTHRThermon Group Hol…ELME logoELMEElme Communities
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.50$57.00$19.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts181158
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.2%+0.4%+34.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00120
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.33$0.81$0.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+10.6%+0.2%0.0%+1.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — THR and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WLFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). THR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallWillis Lease Finance Corpor… (WLFC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WNC vs WLFC vs GNSS vs THR vs ELME: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME?

On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.

5x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, Willis Lease Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Willis Lease Finance Corporation wins at 0. 23x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME?

Over the past 5 years, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) delivered a total return of +440.

7%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLFC returned +879. 9% versus WNC's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elme Communities (ELME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

47β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 312% more volatile than ELME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1066. 7% for Elme Communities. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLFC leads at 29. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME?

Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

8% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLFC leads at 32. 3% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLFC leads at 65. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796. 2% to $19. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME?

In this comparison, ELME (34.

1% yield), WNC (4. 2% yield), WLFC (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GNSS, THR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WNC or WLFC or GNSS or THR or ELME better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Elme Communities (ELME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

47), 34. 1% yield). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELME: -11. 6%, WNC: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WNC and WLFC and GNSS and THR and ELME?

These companies operate in different sectors (WNC (Industrials) and WLFC (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and THR (Industrials) and ELME (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WLFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; THR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock. WNC, ELME pay a dividend while WLFC, GNSS, THR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WLFC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNSS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

THR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ELME

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 13.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WNC and WLFC and GNSS and THR and ELME on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WNC: -20.4% · WLFC: 23.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WNC: 1.5x · WLFC: 14.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.