Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.03B | $77.41B | $39.42B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $713M | $2.79B | $6.06B | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.58B | $616M | $574M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | -31.0% | 55.2% | 37.2% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -141.1% | 26.1% | 10.8% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 73.1x | 34.4x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $6.55B | $24M | $3.47B | $3.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $467M | $1.10B | $2.15B | $360M |
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WOLF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +10.0% vs ENTG's +88.9%
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
ON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (34.4x vs 41.4x)
- Beta 1.95 vs WOLF's 3.11
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.4x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs WOLF's -222.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs WOLF's 3.11 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.0% vs ENTG's +88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs WOLF's -31.7%, ROIC 22.2% vs -17.1% |
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 4 of 6 categories
ON leads 2 • WOLF leads 0 • ENTG leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 8.5x WOLF's $713M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WOLF's -2.2%. On growth, MPWR holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $713M | $2.8B | $6.1B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$808M | $781M | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $616M | $574M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$750M | $664M | $1.5B | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -31.0% | +55.2% | +37.2% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -141.1% | +26.1% | +10.8% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +22.1% | +9.5% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.3% | +23.8% | +24.0% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +20.8% | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.4% | -88.4% | +93.0% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 95.3x trailing earnings, ENTG trades at a 73% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 97.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $77.4B | $39.4B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $76.3B | $40.7B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.32x | 123.60x | 346.84x | 95.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.12x | 34.37x | 41.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 97.90x | 28.42x | 19.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.68x | 27.74x | 6.57x | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 21.56x | 5.38x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 116.20x | 27.79x | 56.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-52 for WOLF. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENTG's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs WOLF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.1% | +17.9% | +7.4% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.7% | +15.2% | +4.5% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.1% | +22.2% | +6.1% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.5% | +20.4% | +6.2% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.45x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.1B | -$1.1B | $1.3B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $467M | $1.1B | $2.1B | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $24M | $3.5B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.31x | — | 10.49x | 2.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,710 for WOLF. Over the past 12 months, WOLF leads with a +996.4% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs WOLF's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +138.0% | +68.5% | +77.4% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +996.4% | +148.6% | +159.2% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | +280.3% | +24.9% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.9% | +366.2% | +160.4% | +30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.7% | +2494.7% | +1004.1% | +1040.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +56.1% | +7.7% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ON is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WOLF's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ON currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs WOLF's 92.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.11x | 2.28x | 1.95x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.00 | $1662.00 | $105.88 | $159.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $613.00 | $37.56 | $66.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +94.8% | +95.0% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.4 | 71.0 | 81.5 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 577K | 9.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WOLF as "Hold", MPWR as "Buy", ON as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for ENTG (target: $152) vs -55.6% for WOLF (target: $20). For income investors, MPWR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.37% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $1615.00 | $62.40 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 25 | 45 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.90 | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% |
MPWR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ON leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) offers the better valuation at 95. 3x trailing P/E (41. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG?
On trailing P/E, Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the cheapest at 95. 3x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 34. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -52. 9% for Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus WOLF's +94. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
95β versus Wolfspeed, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning WOLF is approximately 60% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Entegris, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entegris, Inc. grew EPS -19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -212. 4% for Wolfspeed, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -175. 4% for WOLF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 34.
4x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 38. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENTG: 2. 9% to $152. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG?
In this comparison, MPWR (0.
4% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. WOLF, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1004% 10Y return).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1004%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WOLF and MPWR and ON and ENTG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.