Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.03B | $77.41B | $39.42B | $22.48B | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $713M | $2.79B | $6.06B | $3.24B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.58B | $616M | $574M | $265M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | -31.0% | 55.2% | 37.2% | 43.2% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -141.1% | 26.1% | 10.8% | 29.1% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 67.2x | 33.7x | 41.0x | 26.0x |
| Total Debt | $6.55B | $24M | $3.47B | $3.89B | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $467M | $1.10B | $2.15B | $360M | $10.61B |
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 763.2 | +663.2% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 625.8 | +525.8% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 249.0 | +149.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2423.6 | +2323.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WOLF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +10.0% vs NVDA's +80.7%
MPWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
- Beta 2.28, yield 0.4%, current ratio 5.91x
- 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ON lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ENTG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs MPWR's 2.28
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.0x vs 41.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs WOLF's -222.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs WOLF's 3.11 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.0% vs NVDA's +80.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs WOLF's -31.7%, ROIC 81.8% vs -17.1% |
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories
MPWR leads 1 • WOLF leads 0 • ON leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 303.1x WOLF's $713M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WOLF's -2.2%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $713M | $2.8B | $6.1B | $3.2B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$808M | $781M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $616M | $574M | $265M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$750M | $664M | $1.5B | $721M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -31.0% | +55.2% | +37.2% | +43.2% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -141.1% | +26.1% | +10.8% | +29.1% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +22.1% | +9.5% | +8.2% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.3% | +23.8% | +24.0% | +22.3% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +20.8% | +4.7% | +5.0% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.4% | -88.4% | +93.0% | +46.3% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WOLF and ON and NVDA each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 88% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $77.4B | $39.4B | $22.5B | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $76.3B | $40.7B | $26.0B | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.32x | 123.60x | 346.84x | 95.26x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 67.24x | 33.68x | 41.04x | 26.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x | — | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 97.90x | 28.42x | 19.81x | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.68x | 27.74x | 6.57x | 7.03x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 21.56x | 5.38x | 5.68x | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 116.20x | 27.79x | 56.74x | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-52 for WOLF. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENTG's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs WOLF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.1% | +17.9% | +7.4% | +6.7% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.7% | +15.2% | +4.5% | +3.1% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.1% | +22.2% | +6.1% | +9.3% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.5% | +20.4% | +6.2% | +11.7% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.45x | 0.98x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.1B | -$1.1B | $1.3B | $3.5B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $467M | $1.1B | $2.1B | $360M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $24M | $3.5B | $3.9B | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.31x | — | 10.49x | 2.47x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,710 for WOLF. Over the past 12 months, WOLF leads with a +996.4% total return vs NVDA's +80.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs WOLF's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +138.0% | +68.5% | +77.4% | +65.1% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +996.4% | +148.6% | +159.2% | +88.9% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | +280.3% | +24.9% | +87.4% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.9% | +366.2% | +160.4% | +30.4% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.7% | +2494.7% | +1004.1% | +1040.3% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +56.1% | +7.7% | +23.3% | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WOLF's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs WOLF's 92.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.99x | 2.27x | 1.91x | 2.73x | 1.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.00 | $1662.00 | $105.88 | $159.15 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $613.00 | $37.56 | $66.32 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +94.8% | +95.0% | +92.8% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.4 | 71.0 | 81.5 | 63.8 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 577K | 9.2M | 2.4M | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WOLF as "Hold", MPWR as "Buy", ON as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for NVDA (target: $276) vs -55.6% for WOLF (target: $20). For income investors, MPWR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.37% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $1615.00 | $94.25 | $152.00 | $275.74 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 25 | 46 | 26 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | +0.3% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.90 | — | $0.40 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPWR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WOLF vs MPWR vs ON vs ENTG vs NVDA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 43.
2x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -52.
9% for Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus WOLF's +101. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
74β versus Wolfspeed, Inc. 's 2. 99β — meaning WOLF is approximately 72% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Entegris, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -212. 4% for Wolfspeed, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -175. 4% for WOLF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 26. 0x forward P/E versus 67. 2x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 41. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 30. 4% to $275. 74.
08Which pays a better dividend — WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA?
In this comparison, MPWR (0.
4% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. WOLF, ON, NVDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WOLF or MPWR or ON or ENTG or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1033% 10Y return).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1033%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WOLF and MPWR and ON and ENTG and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.