Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WOR vs FCX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
WOR vs FCX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Copper |
| Market Cap | $2.75B | $87.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $26.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $2.73B |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 27.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 27.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $326M | $11.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $3.35B |
WOR vs FCX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worthington Industr… (WOR) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 671.3 | +571.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WOR vs FCX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 34.8%, current ratio 3.48x
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.2%, current ratio 3.48x
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 444.7% 10Y total return vs WOR's 175.4%
- PEG 0.75 vs WOR's 2.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs WOR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs WOR's 8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, vs FCX's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.2% vs WOR's +0.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FCX's 4.7%, ROIC 3.8% vs 12.8% |
WOR vs FCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WOR vs FCX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 19.9x WOR's $1.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.3% (FCX) to 8.4% (WOR). On growth, WOR holds the edge at +24.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $26.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | $9.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $204M | $6.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +27.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.4% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.7% | +154.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WOR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.1x trailing earnings, WOR trades at a 27% valuation discount to FCX's 40.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.34x vs WOR's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $87.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $95.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.11x | 40.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.27x | 22.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.57x | 1.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.83x | 11.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.99x | 2.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.29x | 78.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WOR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WOR delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for FCX. WOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCX's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WOR scores 7/9 vs FCX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $76M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $326M | $11.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.70x | 17.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FCX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCX five years ago would be worth $15,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,570 for WOR. Over the past 12 months, FCX leads with a +62.2% total return vs WOR's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCX at 19.7% vs WOR's 17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.9% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | +62.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.9% | +71.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.7% | +51.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.4% | +444.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.9% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WOR and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.8% from its 52-week high vs WOR's 78.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.91 | $70.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.01 | $35.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +85.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WOR and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WOR as "Buy" and FCX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.9% upside for WOR (target: $67) vs 10.0% for FCX (target: $67). For income investors, WOR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.21% vs FCX's 0.98%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.1% |
FCX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WOR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
WOR vs FCX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WOR or FCX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR). Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) offers the better valuation at 29. 1x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WOR or FCX?
On trailing P/E, Worthington Industries, Inc.
(WOR) is the cheapest at 29. 1x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 1x. On forward P/E, Worthington Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Worthington Industries, Inc. 's 2. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WOR or FCX?
Over the past 5 years, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) delivered a total return of +51. 5%, compared to +35. 7% for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCX returned +444. 7% versus WOR's +175. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WOR or FCX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Worthington Industries, Inc.
(WOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FCX is approximately 89% more volatile than WOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 37% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WOR or FCX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -7. 4% for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -12. 7% for Worthington Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FCX leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WOR or FCX?
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 8. 3% for Worthington Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCX leads at 24. 4% versus 4. 3% for WOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WOR leads at 27. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WOR or FCX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Worthington Industries, Inc. 's 2. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WOR: 19. 9% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WOR or FCX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX).
09Is WOR or FCX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Worthington Industries, Inc.
(WOR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 2% yield, +175. 4% 10Y return). Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WOR: +175. 4%, FCX: +444. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WOR and FCX?
These companies operate in different sectors (WOR (Industrials) and FCX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.