Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WPP vs HURN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
WPP vs HURN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $4.00B | $1.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.03B | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $584M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 16.3% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $6.35B | $548M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.64B | $25M |
WPP vs HURN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPP plc (WPP) | 100 | 49.0 | -51.0% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 259.6 | +159.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WPP vs HURN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WPP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 14.2%
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 13.7x)
- 14.2% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
HURN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 108.4% 10Y total return vs WPP's -59.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 1.17x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs WPP's -0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs WPP's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs WPP's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -19.5% vs WPP's -46.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs WPP's 2.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs 12.5% |
WPP vs HURN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WPP vs HURN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WPP is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.0B annually — 16.7x HURN's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.0% (HURN) to 2.0% (WPP). On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.0B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $584M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.9% | +0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WPP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, WPP trades at a 73% valuation discount to HURN's 20.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WPP's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HURN's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.57x | 20.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.40x | 13.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.66x | 10.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 4.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.51x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HURN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HURN delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for WPP. HURN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WPP's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WPP scores 7/9 vs HURN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.1% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.70x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $524M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.3B | $548M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.37x | 7.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $21,323 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,340 for WPP. Over the past 12 months, HURN leads with a -19.5% total return vs WPP's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 16.1% vs WPP's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.1% | -29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.4% | -19.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.7% | +56.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.6% | +113.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | +108.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.2% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
HURN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HURN is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WPP's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HURN currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs WPP's 45.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.95 | $186.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.81 | $112.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.3% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 627K | 255K |
Analyst Outlook
WPP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WPP as "Hold" and HURN as "Buy". WPP is the only dividend payer here at 14.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $200.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +8.4% |
HURN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WPP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
WPP vs HURN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WPP or HURN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WPP or HURN?
On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.
6x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, WPP plc is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WPP or HURN?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +113. 2%, compared to -56. 6% for WPP plc (WPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HURN returned +108. 4% versus WPP's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WPP or HURN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus WPP plc's 1. 08β — meaning WPP is approximately 31% more volatile than HURN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WPP or HURN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -0. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -6. 9% for Huron Consulting Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WPP or HURN?
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus 3. 7% for WPP plc — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 9. 0% for WPP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HURN leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WPP or HURN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, WPP plc (WPP) trades at 7.
4x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WPP or HURN?
In this comparison, WPP (14.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HURN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WPP or HURN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WPP plc (WPP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
08), 14. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WPP: -59. 1%, HURN: +108. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WPP and HURN?
These companies operate in different sectors (WPP (Communication Services) and HURN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WPP pays a dividend while HURN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.