Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WPP vs HURN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WPP
WPP plc

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$4.00B
5Y Perf.-51.0%
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.99B
5Y Perf.+159.6%

WPP vs HURN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WPP logoWPP
HURN logoHURN
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesConsulting Services
Market Cap$4.00B$1.99B
Revenue (TTM)$29.03B$1.74B
Net Income (TTM)$584M$104M
Gross Margin16.3%23.3%
Operating Margin6.7%11.3%
Forward P/E7.4x13.7x
Total Debt$6.35B$548M
Cash & Equiv.$2.64B$25M

WPP vs HURNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WPP
HURN
StockMay 20May 26Return
WPP plc (WPP)10049.0-51.0%
Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN)100259.6+159.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WPP vs HURN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HURN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. WPP plc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WPP
WPP plc
The Income Pick

WPP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 14.2%
  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 13.7x)
  • 14.2% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
The Growth Play

HURN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
  • 108.4% 10Y total return vs WPP's -59.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHURN logoHURN14.3% revenue growth vs WPP's -0.7%
ValueWPP logoWPPLower P/E (7.4x vs 13.7x)
Quality / MarginsHURN logoHURN6.0% margin vs WPP's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyHURN logoHURNBeta 0.82 vs WPP's 1.08, lower leverage
DividendsWPP logoWPP14.2% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HURN logoHURN-19.5% vs WPP's -46.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HURN logoHURN6.8% ROA vs WPP's 2.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs 12.5%

WPP vs HURN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WPPWPP plc

Segment breakdown not available.

HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
FY 2025
Healthcare
50.5%$858M
Education
30.0%$510M
Commercial
19.5%$331M

WPP vs HURN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHURNLAGGINGWPP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HURN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

WPP is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.0B annually — 16.7x HURN's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.0% (HURN) to 2.0% (WPP). On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWPP logoWPPWPP plcHURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$29.0B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.6B$231M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$584M$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.7B$124M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+16.3%+23.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.7%+11.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+6.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.9%+7.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.8%+14.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.9%+0.8%
HURN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WPP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.6x trailing earnings, WPP trades at a 73% valuation discount to HURN's 20.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WPP's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HURN's 10.9x.

MetricWPP logoWPPWPP plcHURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …
Market CapShares × price$4.0B$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.57x20.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.40x13.65x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.66x10.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.20x1.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.80x4.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.51x10.88x
WPP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HURN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

HURN delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for WPP. HURN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WPP's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WPP scores 7/9 vs HURN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWPP logoWPPWPP plcHURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.1%+21.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%+6.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.5%+15.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.0%+18.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.70x1.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.7B$524M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.6B$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6.3B$548M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.37x7.70x
HURN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $21,323 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,340 for WPP. Over the past 12 months, HURN leads with a -19.5% total return vs WPP's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 16.1% vs WPP's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWPP logoWPPWPP plcHURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.1%-29.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-46.4%-19.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.7%+56.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.6%+113.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.1%+108.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-23.2%+16.1%
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HURN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HURN is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WPP's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HURN currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs WPP's 45.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWPP logoWPPWPP plcHURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.08x0.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.95$186.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.81$112.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.3%+64.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.155.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded627K255K
HURN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WPP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates WPP as "Hold" and HURN as "Buy". WPP is the only dividend payer here at 14.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWPP logoWPPWPP plcHURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$200.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts139
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises41
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.8%+8.4%
WPP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HURN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WPP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallHuron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WPP vs HURN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WPP or HURN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WPP or HURN?

On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.

6x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, WPP plc is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WPP or HURN?

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +113. 2%, compared to -56. 6% for WPP plc (WPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HURN returned +108. 4% versus WPP's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WPP or HURN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus WPP plc's 1. 08β — meaning WPP is approximately 31% more volatile than HURN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WPP or HURN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -0. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -6. 9% for Huron Consulting Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WPP or HURN?

Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus 3. 7% for WPP plc — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 9. 0% for WPP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HURN leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WPP or HURN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, WPP plc (WPP) trades at 7.

4x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WPP or HURN?

In this comparison, WPP (14.

2% yield) pays a dividend. HURN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WPP or HURN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, WPP plc (WPP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

08), 14. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WPP: -59. 1%, HURN: +108. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WPP and HURN?

These companies operate in different sectors (WPP (Communication Services) and HURN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WPP pays a dividend while HURN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WPP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 5.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HURN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WPP and HURN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WPP: -7.8% · HURN: 14.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(WPP: 2.0% · HURN: 6.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WPP: 5.6x · HURN: 20.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.