WPP vs OMC vs IPG vs HURN vs ICFI

For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.

6x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Omnicom Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICF International, Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 's 4. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -57. 1% for WPP plc (WPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HURN returned +116. 8% versus WPP's -59. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICF International, Inc.

(ICFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus WPP plc's 1. 08β — meaning WPP is approximately 107% more volatile than ICFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -103. 6% for Omnicom Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

(IPG) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -0. 3% for Omnicom Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMC leads at 15. 0% versus 8. 1% for ICFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICFI leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 's 4. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HURN: 60. 3% to $200. 00.

In this comparison, WPP (14.

0% yield), IPG (5. 4% yield), OMC (3. 5% yield), ICFI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. HURN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ICF International, Inc.

(ICFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 0. 8% yield, +100. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICFI: +100. 5%, HURN: +116. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WPP (Communication Services) and OMC (Communication Services) and IPG (Communication Services) and HURN (Industrials) and ICFI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; OMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IPG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. WPP, OMC, IPG, ICFI pay a dividend while HURN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.