Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Auto - Parts
Waste Management
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Auto - Parts | Waste Management | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $33M | $507M | $464M | $207M | $4.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $160M | $439M | $3M | $59M | $1.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $-99M | $-57M | $-18M | $211M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 11.7% | 4.9% | 4.1% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 7.4% | -18.9% | -26.3% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $53M | $99M | $4M | $4M | $570M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $158M | $23M | $12M | $236M |
WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westport Fuel Syste… (WPRT) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Hyliion Holdings Co… (HYLN) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
| Atmus Filtration Te… (ATMU) | 100 | 264.4 | +164.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WPRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.88
- Beta 0.88 vs HYLN's 2.39
CLNE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 2.32x
- Better valuation composite
HYLN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 130.3%, EPS growth -10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- 130.3% revenue growth vs WPRT's -8.9%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs ATMU's 155.0%
ATMU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 15.7% margin vs HYLN's -16.5%
- 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +54.7% vs WPRT's -28.6%
- 14.4% ROA vs HYLN's -28.1%, ROIC 31.2% vs -23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.3% revenue growth vs WPRT's -8.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs HYLN's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs HYLN's 2.39 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.7% vs WPRT's -28.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs HYLN's -28.1%, ROIC 31.2% vs -23.7% |
WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATMU leads in 4 of 6 categories
WPRT leads 1 • CLNE leads 0 • HYLN leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATMU is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 387.9x HYLN's $3M. ATMU is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYLN's -16.5%. On growth, CLNE holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $160M | $439M | $3M | $59M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $62M | -$60M | -$14M | $333M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | -$99M | -$57M | -$18M | $211M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $19M | -$70M | -$14M | $158M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +11.7% | +4.9% | +4.1% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +7.4% | -18.9% | -26.3% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.9% | -22.7% | -16.5% | -30.1% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +4.3% | -20.2% | -23.4% | +11.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.6% | +13.3% | -52.8% | -20.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.9% | +90.0% | +12.5% | -110.5% | +9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WPRT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATMU's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLNE's 94.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $507M | $464M | $207M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $448M | $445M | $200M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.51x | -2.29x | -7.48x | -14.89x | 21.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 18.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 94.64x | — | — | 15.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 1.19x | 133.54x | 3.36x | 2.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 0.90x | 2.26x | 4.11x | 12.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.47x | — | — | 30.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMU delivers a 58.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-52 for WPRT. HYLN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATMU's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATMU scores 7/9 vs HYLN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.3% | -17.2% | -29.8% | -34.5% | +58.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.2% | -9.2% | -28.1% | -20.2% | +14.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.8% | -9.4% | -23.7% | -21.7% | +31.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.2% | -9.4% | -29.6% | -16.7% | +31.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.18x | 0.02x | 0.09x | 1.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | -$59M | -$19M | -$7M | $334M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $158M | $23M | $12M | $236M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $99M | $4M | $4M | $570M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | -1.07x | — | -42.14x | 6.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATMU five years ago would be worth $25,499 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $307 for WPRT. Over the past 12 months, ATMU leads with a +54.7% total return vs WPRT's -28.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATMU at 36.6% vs WPRT's -37.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +6.9% | +35.7% | -8.8% | +4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.6% | +44.4% | +52.5% | +26.2% | +54.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.4% | -46.3% | +40.3% | +21.7% | +155.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -73.8% | -72.9% | +45.6% | +155.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.9% | -26.9% | -74.5% | +178.6% | +155.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.3% | -18.7% | +12.0% | +6.8% | +36.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WPRT and HYLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HYLN's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HYLN currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs WPRT's 46.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 1.19x | 2.39x | 1.85x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $3.11 | $2.56 | $16.50 | $66.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.54 | $1.56 | $1.11 | $8.02 | $34.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.3% | +74.3% | +96.5% | +67.7% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 44.6 | 73.4 | 41.5 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 1.3M | 949K | 164K | 996K |
Analyst Outlook
ATMU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLNE as "Buy", HYLN as "Hold", PESI as "Hold", ATMU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -26.5% for ATMU (target: $40). ATMU is the only dividend payer here at 0.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $3.13 | $18.00 | $40.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
ATMU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WPRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WPRT vs CLNE vs HYLN vs PESI vs ATMU: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is the stronger pick with 130. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (WPRT). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU?
Over the past 5 years, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
(ATMU) delivered a total return of +155. 0%, compared to -96. 9% for Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (WPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus WPRT's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westport Fuel Systems Inc.
(WPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus Hyliion Holdings Corp. 's 2. 39β — meaning HYLN is approximately 171% more volatile than WPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 151% for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is pulling ahead at 130. 3% versus -8. 9% for Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (WPRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westport Fuel Systems Inc. grew EPS 56. 9% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HYLN leads at 18. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU?
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
(ATMU) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -1645. 7% for Hyliion Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATMU leads at 16. 4% versus -1886. 4% for HYLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATMU leads at 28. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU?
In this comparison, ATMU (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. WPRT, CLNE, HYLN, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WPRT or CLNE or HYLN or PESI or ATMU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Westport Fuel Systems Inc.
(WPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88)). Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WPRT: -91. 9%, HYLN: -74. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WPRT and CLNE and HYLN and PESI and ATMU?
These companies operate in different sectors (WPRT (Consumer Cyclical) and CLNE (Energy) and HYLN (Consumer Cyclical) and PESI (Industrials) and ATMU (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WPRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYLN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATMU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.