Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WST vs ATR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
WST vs ATR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $22.53B | $7.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $3.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $543M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | 36.3x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $417M | $1.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $791M | $402M |
WST vs ATR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Pharmaceutical… (WST) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) | 100 | 110.1 | +10.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WST vs ATR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth 1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- 353.8% 10Y total return vs ATR's 80.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 13.1%, current ratio 3.02x
ATR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.5%
- PEG 1.71 vs WST's 4.38
- Beta 0.66, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs ATR's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.0x vs 36.3x), PEG 1.71 vs 4.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs ATR's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs WST's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs WST's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.6% vs ATR's -17.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs ATR's 7.6%, ROIC 17.5% vs 10.7% |
WST vs ATR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WST vs ATR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATR and WST operate at a comparable scale, with $3.9B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. WST is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATR's 10.0%. On growth, WST holds the edge at +21.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $794M | $801M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $543M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $458M | $325M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.0% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.1% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ATR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.9x trailing earnings, ATR trades at a 55% valuation discount to WST's 46.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATR offers better value at 1.62x vs WST's 5.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.5B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.2B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.96x | 20.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.26x | 22.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.56x | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.87x | 11.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.33x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.15x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.05x | 26.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WST leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATR delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $18 for WST. WST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATR's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WST scores 6/9 vs ATR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.9% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.2% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.5% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$375M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $791M | $402M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $417M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3338.00x | 16.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WST five years ago would be worth $9,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,370 for ATR. Over the past 12 months, WST leads with a +52.6% total return vs ATR's -17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATR at 1.7% vs WST's -5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.2% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.6% | -17.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.2% | +5.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.9% | -16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +353.8% | +80.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.0% | +1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WST and ATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATR is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WST's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WST currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs ATR's 74.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $322.34 | $164.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $202.79 | $103.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +74.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.2 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 826K | 466K |
Analyst Outlook
ATR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WST as "Buy" and ATR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.4% upside for ATR (target: $170) vs 1.0% for WST (target: $316). For income investors, ATR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.48% vs WST's 0.27%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $315.83 | $169.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 25 | 33 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $1.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +4.6% |
WST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WST vs ATR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WST or ATR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
(WST) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (22. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WST or ATR?
On trailing P/E, AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. at 46. 0x. On forward P/E, AptarGroup, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AptarGroup, Inc. wins at 1. 71x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 4. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WST or ATR?
Over the past 5 years, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
(WST) delivered a total return of -3. 9%, compared to -16. 3% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WST returned +353. 8% versus ATR's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WST or ATR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning WST is approximately 38% more volatile than ATR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 56% for AptarGroup, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WST or ATR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
(WST) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus 5. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AptarGroup, Inc. grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WST or ATR?
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
(WST) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 10. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WST leads at 20. 1% versus 13. 6% for ATR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WST leads at 35. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WST or ATR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 71x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 4. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) trades at 22. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATR: 38. 4% to $169. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — WST or ATR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 3% for West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST).
09Is WST or ATR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AptarGroup, Inc.
(ATR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATR: +80. 7%, WST: +353. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WST and ATR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ATR pays a dividend while WST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.