WY vs LPX

For growth investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger pick with -3.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) offers the better valuation at 33. 5x trailing P/E (28. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) is the cheapest at 33.

5x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation is actually cheaper at 28. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) delivered a total return of +6.

9%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPX returned +332. 5% versus WY's +15. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Louisiana-Pacific Corporation's 1. 20β — meaning LPX is approximately 134% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is pulling ahead at -3.

1% versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LPX leads at -11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

4% net margin versus 4. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPX leads at 9. 6% versus 6. 7% for WY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LPX leads at 21. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) trades at 28.

7x forward P/E versus 84. 8x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 56. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPX: 46. 2% to $102. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 6% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +15. 2%, LPX: +332. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WY (Real Estate) and LPX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.