WY vs WFG

For growth investors, West Fraser Timber Co.

Ltd. (WFG) is the stronger pick with 23. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the better valuation at 52. 7x trailing P/E (83. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) delivered a total return of -20.

8%, compared to -22. 5% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFG returned +118. 9% versus WY's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 's 0. 66β — meaning WFG is approximately 28% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), West Fraser Timber Co.

Ltd. (WFG) is pulling ahead at 23. 5% versus -3. 1% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -222. 8% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WFG leads at -7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

7% net margin versus -17. 2% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WY leads at 6. 7% versus -8. 7% for WFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WY leads at 7. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFG: 35.

1% to $80. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 2% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +14. 4%, WFG: +118. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WY (Real Estate) and WFG (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WFG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.