Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Biotechnology
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $998M | $418M | $1.88B | $7.25B | $537.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $217M | $0.00 | $1.37B | $64.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $18M | $-120M | $-77M | $16.21B |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 58.2% | — | 79.6% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 0.7% | — | -7.1% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | 720.7x | 16.8x | — | 28.6x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $8M | $6M | $118M | $104.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $67M | $77M | $481M | $10.79B |
WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Tyra Biosciences, I… (TYRA) | 100 | 198.6 | +98.6% |
| Procore Technologie… (PCOR) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 214.4 | +114.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, WYFI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IIIV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 25.0x)
TYRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.65
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 14.67x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 14.67x
- Beta 0.65 vs WYFI's 4.22, lower leverage
PCOR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.8%, EPS growth 6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.5%
- 14.8% revenue growth vs TYRA's -38.9%
ORCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 399.6% 10Y total return vs WYFI's 60.9%
- 25.3% margin vs WYFI's -17.0%
- 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 8.1% ROA vs TYRA's -38.4%, ROIC 12.8% vs -44.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.8% revenue growth vs TYRA's -38.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs WYFI's -17.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs WYFI's 4.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +240.4% vs PCOR's -33.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs TYRA's -38.4%, ROIC 12.8% vs -44.8% |
WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
TYRA leads 2 • IIIV leads 1 • WYFI leads 0 • PCOR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL and TYRA operate at a comparable scale, with $64.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WYFI's -17.0%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $217M | $0 | $1.4B | $64.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $30M | -$132M | $16M | $26.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $18M | -$120M | -$77M | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$245M | $50M | -$95M | $275M | -$24.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +58.2% | — | +79.6% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +0.7% | — | -7.1% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +8.3% | — | -5.6% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +22.8% | — | +20.0% | -38.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.6% | -8.8% | — | +15.7% | +21.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.8% | -32.6% | +72.7% | +24.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IIIV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.8x trailing earnings, IIIV trades at a 95% valuation discount to WYFI's 720.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IIIV's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WYFI's 52.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $998M | $418M | $1.9B | $7.3B | $537.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1000M | $359M | $1.8B | $6.9B | $630.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 720.72x | 33.77x | -17.38x | -71.78x | 43.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.75x | — | 28.59x | 24.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 6.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.30x | 11.25x | — | — | 26.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.95x | 1.96x | — | 5.48x | 9.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.81x | 1.25x | 8.03x | 5.72x | 25.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 111.32x | — | 33.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-41 for TYRA. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WYFI scores 9/9 vs TYRA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.8% | +3.7% | -41.2% | -6.3% | +56.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | +2.9% | -38.4% | -3.7% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +0.6% | -44.8% | -9.7% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +0.7% | -43.3% | -8.6% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.02x | 0.09x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$59M | -$72M | -$362M | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $67M | $77M | $481M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $8M | $6M | $118M | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.55x | — | -43.00x | 5.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TYRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,372 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,465 for PCOR. Over the past 12 months, TYRA leads with a +240.4% total return vs PCOR's -33.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TYRA at 41.2% vs PCOR's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.0% | -25.1% | +30.4% | -31.3% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.9% | -25.4% | +240.4% | -33.4% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | -11.2% | +181.7% | -11.4% | +96.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | -37.1% | +34.3% | -45.4% | +153.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +3.1% | +34.3% | -45.4% | +399.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | -3.9% | +41.2% | -3.9% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TYRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TYRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYFI's 4.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TYRA currently trades 85.9% from its 52-week high vs ORCL's 54.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.22x | 0.85x | 0.65x | 1.27x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.75 | $33.97 | $40.65 | $82.32 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.51 | $18.77 | $8.75 | $46.08 | $134.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +55.7% | +85.9% | +58.4% | +54.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.6 | 37.1 | 45.3 | 39.5 | 67.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 978K | 315K | 1.1M | 2.2M | 25.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WYFI as "Buy", IIIV as "Buy", TYRA as "Buy", PCOR as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.4% upside for IIIV (target: $29) vs 5.1% for WYFI (target: $27). ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.43 | $29.00 | $50.50 | $67.40 | $257.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 7 | 24 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +0.3% |
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TYRA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
WYFI vs IIIV vs TYRA vs PCOR vs ORCL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) is the stronger pick with 14. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the cheapest at 33. 8x versus WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares at 720. 7x. On forward P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +153.
7%, compared to -45. 4% for Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +399. 6% versus PCOR's -45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
(TYRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares's 4. 22β — meaning WYFI is approximately 545% more volatile than TYRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) is pulling ahead at 14. 8% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares grew EPS 211. 7% year-over-year, compared to -87. 9% for i3 Verticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCOR leads at 22. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -7. 6% for Procore Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -8. 9% for PCOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCOR leads at 78. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Procore Technologies, Inc. — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IIIV: 53. 4% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL?
In this comparison, ORCL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. WYFI, IIIV, TYRA, PCOR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WYFI or IIIV or TYRA or PCOR or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
(TYRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65)). WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) carries a higher beta of 4. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TYRA: +34. 3%, WYFI: +60. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WYFI and IIIV and TYRA and PCOR and ORCL?
These companies operate in different sectors (WYFI (Technology) and IIIV (Technology) and TYRA (Healthcare) and PCOR (Technology) and ORCL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ORCL pays a dividend while WYFI, IIIV, TYRA, PCOR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.