Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WYHG
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$41M
5Y Perf.-79.3%
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$876M
5Y Perf.-13.2%
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.15B
5Y Perf.-71.0%
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$749M
5Y Perf.+99.4%

WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WYHG logoWYHG
JBSS logoJBSS
SMPL logoSMPL
SENEA logoSENEA
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged FoodsPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$41M$876M$1.15B$749M
Revenue (TTM)$98.97B$1.14B$1.45B$1.61B
Net Income (TTM)$6.29B$70M$91M$90M
Gross Margin29.0%19.1%34.0%12.6%
Operating Margin9.5%8.9%14.4%7.9%
Forward P/E5.3x11.4x6.9x10.7x
Total Debt$29M$102M$304M$375M
Cash & Equiv.$85M$585K$98M$43M

WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WYHG
JBSS
SMPL
SENEA
StockNov 24May 26Return
Wing Yip Food Holdi… (WYHG)10020.7-79.3%
John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS)10086.8-13.2%
The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL)10029.0-71.0%
Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA)100199.4+99.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WYHG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. SMPL and SENEA also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WYHG
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares
The Value Play

WYHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (5.3x vs 11.4x)
  • 6.4% margin vs SENEA's 5.6%
  • 30.2% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC 109.1% vs 8.1%
Best for: value and quality
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
The Income Pick

JBSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 28.3%, current ratio 2.22x
  • Beta 0.14, yield 2.8%, current ratio 2.22x
  • Beta 0.14 vs WYHG's 0.82
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company
The Growth Play

SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
  • PEG 0.29 vs SENEA's 9.51
  • 9.0% revenue growth vs WYHG's -8.8%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

SENEA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 138.4%
  • +53.4% vs SMPL's -66.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSMPL logoSMPL9.0% revenue growth vs WYHG's -8.8%
ValueWYHG logoWYHGLower P/E (5.3x vs 11.4x)
Quality / MarginsWYHG logoWYHG6.4% margin vs SENEA's 5.6%
Stability / SafetyJBSS logoJBSSBeta 0.14 vs WYHG's 0.82
DividendsJBSS logoJBSS2.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SENEA logoSENEA+53.4% vs SMPL's -66.5%
Efficiency (ROA)WYHG logoWYHG30.2% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC 109.1% vs 8.1%

WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WYHGWing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

JBSSJohn B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
FY 2015
Consumer Distribution Channel
59.6%$529M
Commercial Ingredients Distribution Channel
23.4%$207M
Contract Packaging Distribution Channel
12.9%$115M
Export Distribution Channel
4.1%$36M
SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$103M
SENEASeneca Foods Corporation
FY 2025
Canned Vegetables
83.2%$1.3B
Frozen
7.9%$125M
Fruit
5.9%$92M
Manufactured Product, Other
2.1%$32M
Snack
0.9%$15M

WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWYHGLAGGINGSENEA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WYHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $99.0B annually — 86.6x JBSS's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.4% (WYHG) to 5.6% (SENEA). On growth, JBSS holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWYHG logoWYHGWing Yip Food Hol…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…SENEA logoSENEASeneca Foods Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$99.0B$1.1B$1.4B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14.5B$127M$231M$171M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6.3B$70M$91M$90M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$16M$33M$174M$168M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.0%+19.1%+34.0%+12.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.5%+8.9%+14.4%+7.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.4%+6.2%+6.3%+5.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.0%+2.9%+12.0%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-99.9%+4.6%-0.3%+1.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-98.9%+31.9%-31.6%+2.1%
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — WYHG and SMPL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.3x trailing earnings, WYHG trades at a 78% valuation discount to SENEA's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.47x vs SENEA's 21.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWYHG logoWYHGWing Yip Food Hol…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…SENEA logoSENEASeneca Foods Corp…
Market CapShares × price$41M$876M$1.1B$749M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$977M$1.4B$1.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.32x14.89x11.29x24.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.41x6.95x10.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate10.57x0.47x21.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.41x8.41x5.59x8.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.32x0.79x0.79x0.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share358.77x2.43x0.65x1.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.28x2.51x
Evenly matched — WYHG and SMPL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WYHG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

WYHG delivers a 38.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMPL. WYHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SENEA's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SENEA scores 6/9 vs WYHG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWYHG logoWYHGWing Yip Food Hol…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…SENEA logoSENEASeneca Foods Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+38.0%+19.5%+5.2%+12.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+30.2%+11.7%+3.7%+7.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+109.1%+15.2%+8.1%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+89.1%+20.4%+9.4%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–91256
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.28x0.17x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$57M$102M$206M$332M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$85M$585,000$98M$43M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$29M$102M$304M$375M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.25x26.02x6.77x6.90x
WYHG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SENEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SENEA five years ago would be worth $30,594 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,922 for WYHG. Over the past 12 months, SENEA leads with a +53.4% total return vs SMPL's -66.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.5% vs WYHG's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWYHG logoWYHGWing Yip Food Hol…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…SENEA logoSENEASeneca Foods Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+45.0%+9.5%-41.1%+32.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-47.4%+27.1%-66.5%+53.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.8%-26.0%-68.0%+195.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.8%-2.8%-66.6%+205.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.8%+138.4%-4.0%+360.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-42.3%-9.6%-31.6%+43.5%
SENEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JBSS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JBSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYHG's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JBSS currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWYHG logoWYHGWing Yip Food Hol…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…SENEA logoSENEASeneca Foods Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.82x0.14x0.27x0.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.91$85.15$35.16$167.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.39$59.07$10.21$85.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.7%+88.0%+32.8%+85.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.444.245.555.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded821K94K2.9M119K
JBSS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JBSS and SENEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: JBSS as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy". JBSS is the only dividend payer here at 2.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWYHG logoWYHGWing Yip Food Hol…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…SENEA logoSENEASeneca Foods Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts224
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1013
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.08$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+4.4%+1.5%
Evenly matched — JBSS and SENEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SMPL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WYHG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallWing Yip Food Holdings Grou… (WYHG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WYHG vs JBSS vs SMPL vs SENEA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA?

On trailing P/E, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the cheapest at 5.

3x versus Seneca Foods Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 29x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 9. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA?

Over the past 5 years, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) delivered a total return of +205.

9%, compared to -80. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SENEA returned +360. 6% versus WYHG's -80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John B.

Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 82β — meaning WYHG is approximately 510% more volatile than JBSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 59% for Seneca Foods Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.

0% versus -8. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. grew EPS -2. 3% year-over-year, compared to -31. 1% for Seneca Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA?

The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

1% net margin versus 2. 6% for Seneca Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 4. 9% for SENEA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 9. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA?

In this comparison, JBSS (2.

8% yield) pays a dividend. WYHG, SMPL, SENEA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WYHG or JBSS or SMPL or SENEA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, John B.

Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 8% yield, +138. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBSS: +138. 4%, WYHG: -80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WYHG and JBSS and SMPL and SENEA?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WYHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JBSS pays a dividend while WYHG, SMPL, SENEA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WYHG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JBSS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SENEA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WYHG and JBSS and SMPL and SENEA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WYHG: -99.9% · JBSS: 4.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(WYHG: 6.4% · JBSS: 6.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WYHG: 5.3x · JBSS: 14.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.