WYNN vs MGM

For growth investors, MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the stronger pick with 1.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) offers the better valuation at 34. 3x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the cheapest at 34.

3x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited is actually cheaper at 20. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -1.

8%, compared to -9. 9% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGM returned +81. 0% versus WYNN's +33. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 3% more volatile than WYNN relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MGM Resorts International (MGM) is pulling ahead at 1.

7% versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wynn Resorts, Limited grew EPS -27. 8% year-over-year, compared to -68. 3% for MGM Resorts International. Over a 3-year CAGR, WYNN leads at 23. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

6% net margin versus 1. 2% for MGM Resorts International — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYNN leads at 16. 2% versus 5. 7% for MGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGM leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) trades at 20.

9x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for MGM Resorts International — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WYNN: 32. 9% to $143. 00.

In this comparison, WYNN (1.

6% yield) pays a dividend. MGM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

23), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WYNN: +33. 3%, MGM: +81. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

WYNN pays a dividend while MGM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.