Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4M | $22.62B | $9.63B | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $606M | $-92K | $361M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $-1.28B | $-327M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 1.8% | 79.4% | — | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | -419.5% | -194.0% | — | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 217.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $768M | $110K | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $510M | $357M | $75M |
XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beyond Air, Inc. (XAIR) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 318.2 | +218.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 176.6 | +76.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XAIR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.47
- Rev growth 219.7%, EPS growth 62.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 81.5%, current ratio 3.20x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 3.20x
INSM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 2.4% margin vs XAIR's -447.7%
- +7.7% vs XAIR's -86.2%
MNKD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -3.9% ROA vs XAIR's -84.3%, ROIC 21.6% vs -121.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 219.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs XAIR's -447.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs XAIR's -86.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.9% ROA vs XAIR's -84.3%, ROIC 21.6% vs -121.4% |
XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MNKD leads in 2 of 6 categories
XAIR leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • INSM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNKD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $606M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.6% (MNKD) to -4.5% (XAIR). On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $606M | -$92,000 | $361M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$1.2B | -$357M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | -$1.3B | -$327M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$998M | -$283M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +79.4% | — | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -194.0% | — | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | -2.1% | — | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -164.5% | — | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +104.7% | +152.6% | — | +15.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.3% | -16.7% | +2.7% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
XAIR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $22.6B | $9.6B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $22.9B | $9.3B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -16.35x | -24.72x | 177.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 217.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 29.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 37.30x | — | 3.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 30.30x | 8.54x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 80.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNKD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-4 for XAIR. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSM's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSM scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | -168.4% | -43.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -84.3% | -57.3% | -40.2% | -3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -121.4% | -86.5% | -65.0% | +21.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -126.4% | -66.8% | -49.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 1.04x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $258M | -$357M | $399M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $510M | $357M | $75M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $768M | $110,000 | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.24x | -14.23x | — | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $48 for XAIR. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs XAIR's -86.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs XAIR's -83.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.0% | -40.8% | +16.4% | -36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.2% | +53.5% | +775.0% | -26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +454.5% | +1976.5% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +221.7% | -20.8% | -17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +793.5% | -20.1% | -46.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.5% | +77.0% | +174.9% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XAIR and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XAIR is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs XAIR's 8.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.54x | 1.55x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.84 | $212.75 | $356.00 | $6.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $63.81 | $35.18 | $2.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.5% | +49.3% | +93.6% | +54.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 41.9 | 55.6 | 74.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 2.3M | 378K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSM as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 63.3% for PRAX (target: $544).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $217.11 | $544.40 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNKD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XAIR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XAIR vs INSM vs PRAX vs MNKD: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beyond Air, Inc.
(XAIR) is the stronger pick with 219. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). MannKind Corporation (MNKD) offers the better valuation at 177. 5x trailing P/E (217. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insmed Incorporated (INSM) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -99. 5% for Beyond Air, Inc. (XAIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus XAIR's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Beyond Air, Inc.
(XAIR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 228% more volatile than XAIR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 104% for Insmed Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beyond Air, Inc.
(XAIR) is pulling ahead at 219. 7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beyond Air, Inc. grew EPS 62. 1% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD?
MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus -1258. 4% for Beyond Air, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNKD leads at 11. 1% versus -1202. 1% for XAIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNKD leads at 82. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107.
2% to $217. 11.
07Which pays a better dividend — XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is XAIR or INSM or PRAX or MNKD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +793. 5% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +793. 5%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XAIR and INSM and PRAX and MNKD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XAIR is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.