Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $21M | $1712.35T | $73.68B | $5.53B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $14.92B | $0.00 | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-168M | $4.42B | $-464M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | — | 84.5% | — | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | — | 24.3% | — | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.3x | — | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $22M | $2.71B | $98K | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $194M | $3.12B | $714M | $5.23B |
XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exicure, Inc. (XCUR) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XCUR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 87.6%, current ratio 4.45x
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.4% vs XCUR's -66.4%
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 29.6% margin vs XCUR's -19.4%
- 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
- 8.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs XCUR's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs IMVT's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs XCUR's -66.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
XCUR leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XCUR's -19.4%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $14.9B | $0 | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$112M | $4.2B | -$487M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$168M | $4.4B | -$464M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$151M | $4.2B | -$423M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | — | +84.5% | — | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.5% | — | +24.3% | — | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | — | +29.6% | — | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — | +27.9% | — | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +19.0% | — | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.0% | +91.5% | -7.2% | +19.7% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — REGN and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 80% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1712.35T | $73.7B | $5.5B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $1712.35T | $73.3B | $4.8B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.11x | -0.76x | 17.09x | -9.97x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.35x | — | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.78x | — | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 42.70x | — | 5.14x | — | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.02x | 0.66x | 2.46x | 5.83x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.06x | — | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XCUR's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XCUR scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -108.8% | -130.2% | +14.3% | -47.1% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.9% | -89.0% | +11.1% | -44.1% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | — | +8.9% | — | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -116.2% | -145.7% | +10.2% | -66.1% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$172M | -$412M | -$714M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $194M | $3.1B | $714M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $22M | $2.7B | $98,000 | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -679.56x | -189.82x | 108.44x | — | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $123 for XCUR. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs XCUR's -66.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs XCUR's -14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.0% | +4.9% | -8.5% | +5.1% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.4% | +110.4% | +27.1% | +96.1% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.0% | +19.7% | -5.1% | +40.9% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -69.1% | +43.6% | +62.4% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -87.0% | +90.0% | +173.6% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.7% | +6.2% | -1.7% | +12.1% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs XCUR's 28.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.26x | 0.81x | 1.37x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.86 | $26.18 | $821.11 | $30.09 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.10 | $7.53 | $476.49 | $13.36 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.2% | +76.3% | +86.4% | +90.5% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 48.1 | 44.9 | 60.2 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 252K | 631K | 1.4M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.24% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $865.68 | $45.50 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 48 | 23 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
XCUR vs DBVT vs REGN vs IMVT vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -98. 8% for Exicure, Inc. (XCUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus XCUR's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning IMVT is approximately 306% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 88% for Exicure, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exicure, Inc. grew EPS 24. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -1940. 2% for Exicure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -24. 5% for XCUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XCUR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. XCUR, DBVT, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XCUR or DBVT or REGN or IMVT or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XCUR and DBVT and REGN and IMVT and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XCUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while XCUR, DBVT, REGN, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.