Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Manufacturers
XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $11M | $52M | $2.83B | $877M | $4.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $660M | $5.50B | $3.14B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-10M | $192M | $80M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 32.2% | 33.0% | 42.4% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -208.4% | -2.4% | 6.0% | 3.7% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 12.1x | 10.4x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $146M | $1.73B | $1.42B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $20M | $239M | $188M | $748M |
XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) | 100 | 28.4 | -71.6% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
| Guess', Inc. (GES) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 196.8 | +96.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, XELB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CATO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 18.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 89.9%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.70, yield 18.9%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.70 vs AEO's 2.07, lower leverage
AEO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 4.8% ROA vs XELB's -53.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -33.6%
GES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth -75.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- 56.6% 10Y total return vs AEO's 45.8%
- 7.9% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5%
- +53.4% vs XELB's -4.2%
PVH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.2x vs 10.4x)
- 5.3% margin vs XELB's -437.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs XELB's -437.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs AEO's 2.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.9% yield, vs GES's 5.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs XELB's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs XELB's -53.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -33.6% |
XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PVH leads in 2 of 6 categories
AEO leads 1 • GES leads 1 • XELB leads 0 • CATO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1762.6x XELB's $5M. PVH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XELB's -4.4%. On growth, AEO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $660M | $5.5B | $3.1B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$5M | $546M | $150M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$10M | $192M | $80M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$7M | $25M | $123M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +32.2% | +33.0% | +42.4% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -2.4% | +6.0% | +3.7% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -1.5% | +3.5% | +2.6% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -132.8% | -1.1% | +0.5% | +3.9% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | +6.3% | +9.7% | +7.2% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +64.6% | -7.4% | +2.0% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 61% valuation discount to GES's 21.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GES's 8.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $52M | $2.8B | $877M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $178M | $4.3B | $2.1B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.23x | -2.98x | 15.30x | 21.83x | 8.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 12.09x | 10.38x | 8.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.01x | 8.72x | 6.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.08x | 0.51x | 0.29x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 0.34x | 1.74x | 2.09x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 24.63x | 7.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GES delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-131 for XELB. XELB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GES's 2.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PVH scores 7/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -131.3% | -5.8% | +12.1% | +14.2% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.8% | -2.2% | +4.8% | +2.7% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.6% | -6.7% | +8.1% | +7.8% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.4% | -9.6% | +10.7% | +9.3% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.90x | 1.02x | 2.58x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $126M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $20M | $239M | $188M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $146M | $1.7B | $1.4B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.56x | -1.77x | 75.18x | 3.90x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GES five years ago would be worth $8,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,294 for XELB. Over the past 12 months, GES leads with a +53.4% total return vs XELB's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEO at 10.4% vs XELB's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +108.2% | -3.7% | -35.8% | +0.1% | +32.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.2% | +12.9% | +51.4% | +53.4% | +18.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -52.7% | +34.7% | +22.1% | +8.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -60.1% | -47.9% | -16.3% | -21.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | -72.4% | +45.8% | +56.6% | -1.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -22.1% | +10.4% | +6.9% | +2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CATO and GES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GES currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs AEO's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.70x | 2.07x | 0.75x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.17 | $4.92 | $28.46 | $17.15 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $2.30 | $9.27 | $10.29 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.2% | +58.7% | +58.6% | +98.0% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 50.9 | 38.8 | 54.4 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 59K | 5.2M | 9.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CATO and GES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AEO as "Hold", GES as "Hold", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for GES (target: $26) vs 11.8% for PVH (target: $100). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.90% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $24.83 | $26.19 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 52 | 32 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +18.9% | — | +5.6% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.55 | — | $0.94 | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +7.5% | 0.0% | +6.9% | +12.8% |
PVH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
XELB vs CATO vs AEO vs GES vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PVH Corp. (PVH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Guess', Inc. at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, Guess', Inc.
(GES) delivered a total return of -16. 3%, compared to -87. 1% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GES returned +56. 6% versus XELB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning AEO is approximately 198% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for Guess', Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guess', Inc.
(GES) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Cato Corporation grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -819. 6% for Xcel Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GES leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH?
PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -271. 2% for Xcel Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus -259. 2% for XELB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XELB leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp.
(PVH) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GES: 55. 8% to $26. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
9% yield), GES (5. 6% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. XELB, AEO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XELB or CATO or AEO or GES or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 5. 6% yield). American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GES: +56. 6%, AEO: +45. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XELB and CATO and AEO and GES and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XELB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GES is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. CATO, GES pay a dividend while XELB, AEO, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.