Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $5.92B | $3.01B | $1.75B | $5.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $315M | $1.55B | $777M | $1.46B | $769M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $279M | $-29M | $92M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 60.5% | 89.4% | 31.9% | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 18.8% | -5.5% | 11.6% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 55.3x | 17.5x | 24.1x | 14.2x | 136.0x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $738K | $41M | $762M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $359M | $128M | $68M | $120M |
XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xeris Biopharma Hol… (XERS) | 100 | 129.0 | +29.0% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 662.8 | +562.8% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 164.7 | +64.7% |
| Corcept Therapeutic… (CORT) | 100 | 337.2 | +237.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XERS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 100.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- 43.7% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs CORT's 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 2.70x
SUPN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PAHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 136.0x)
- 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +125.1% vs CORT's -27.5%
Among these 5 stocks, CORT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 136.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs SUPN's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs CORT's 1.78, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.1% vs CORT's -27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs SUPN's -2.0%, ROIC 30.6% vs -2.8% |
XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 3 of 6 categories
XERS leads 0 • SUPN leads 0 • PAHC leads 0 • CORT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.9x XERS's $315M. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPN's -3.7%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $315M | $1.5B | $777M | $1.5B | $769M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $347M | $29M | $220M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $279M | -$29M | $92M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $372M | $82M | $47M | $120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.4% | +60.5% | +89.4% | +31.9% | +98.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +18.8% | -5.5% | +11.6% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +18.0% | -3.7% | +6.3% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +24.0% | +10.6% | +3.2% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +1.2% | +38.6% | +20.9% | +4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.5% | +76.5% | +81.0% | +7.4% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LNTH and SUPN and PAHC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.7x trailing earnings, LNTH trades at a 99% valuation discount to XERS's 2071.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LNTH's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CORT's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $5.9B | $3.0B | $1.7B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $5.6B | $2.9B | $2.4B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2071.88x | 26.69x | -76.88x | 36.27x | 62.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.25x | 17.52x | 24.12x | 14.23x | 135.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.88x | 14.61x | 53.44x | 15.65x | 114.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.92x | 3.84x | 4.19x | 1.35x | 7.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 83.66x | 5.72x | 2.78x | 6.15x | 9.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.93x | 16.73x | 65.45x | 41.82x | 38.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XERS delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SUPN. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XERS's 2.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XERS scores 7/9 vs SUPN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +24.3% | -2.7% | +30.8% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +12.4% | -2.0% | +6.7% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.8% | +30.6% | -2.8% | +9.8% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +17.1% | -3.4% | +12.0% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.76x | 0.00x | 0.04x | 2.67x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$73M | -$358M | -$87M | $694M | -$114M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $359M | $128M | $68M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $738,000 | $41M | $762M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 11.72x | — | 3.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LNTH and PAHC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,597 for PAHC. Over the past 12 months, PAHC leads with a +125.1% total return vs CORT's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAHC at 45.9% vs LNTH's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | +35.3% | +5.7% | +16.0% | +33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.0% | +13.1% | +69.0% | +125.1% | -27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.2% | -4.0% | +42.1% | +210.4% | +114.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +314.2% | +78.0% | +66.0% | +141.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | +4192.5% | +228.4% | +128.6% | +929.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.3% | -1.4% | +12.4% | +45.9% | +29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CORT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs CORT's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.47x | 0.78x | 1.38x | 1.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.08 | $93.00 | $59.68 | $60.08 | $91.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.30 | $47.25 | $29.16 | $19.00 | $28.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.8% | +97.8% | +87.6% | +71.8% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 61.2 | 57.9 | 60.3 | 76.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 886K | 604K | 302K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XERS as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy", PAHC as "Buy", CORT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.4% upside for CORT (target: $72) vs 11.0% for LNTH (target: $101). PAHC is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $101.00 | $60.00 | $49.00 | $71.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 17 | 14 | 13 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% |
LNTH leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
XERS vs LNTH vs SUPN vs PAHC vs CORT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (XERS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT?
On trailing P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the cheapest at 26. 7x versus Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. at 2071. 9x. On forward P/E, Phibro Animal Health Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to +66. 0% for Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus XERS's -67. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated's 1. 78β — meaning CORT is approximately 279% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XERS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -5. 4% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CORT leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) trades at 14.
2x forward P/E versus 136. 0x for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated — 121. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CORT: 40. 4% to $71. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT?
In this comparison, PAHC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. XERS, LNTH, SUPN, CORT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XERS or LNTH or SUPN or PAHC or CORT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, XERS: -67. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XERS and LNTH and SUPN and PAHC and CORT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XERS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CORT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PAHC pays a dividend while XERS, LNTH, SUPN, CORT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.