Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
XFOR logo
XFOR
IMVT logo
IMVT
JPM logo
JPM
ARDX logo
ARDX
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XFOR
X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$505M
5Y Perf.-97.7%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.-22.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+227.1%
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.+344.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%

XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XFOR logoXFOR
IMVT logoIMVT
JPM logoJPM
ARDX logoARDX
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$505M$6.90B$896.00B$1.40B$7.70B
Revenue (TTM)$9M$0.00$280.33B$428M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-100M$-506M$57.05B$-58M$-327M
Gross Margin79.4%60.0%91.9%
Operating Margin-10.8%25.9%-8.7%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$77M$72K$942.38B$212M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$217M$902M$343.34B$68M$357M

XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XFOR
IMVT
JPM
ARDX
PRAX
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
X4 Pharmaceuticals,… (XFOR)1002.3-97.7%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10077.1-22.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100327.1+227.1%
Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX)100444.5+344.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
XFOR
X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

XFOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 66.5%
  • 12.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 20.4% margin vs XFOR's -11.1%
  • Beta 0.94 vs XFOR's 2.35
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ARDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
  • +491.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXFOR logoXFOR12.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs XFOR's -11.1%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs XFOR's 2.35
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XFORX4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Other Revenue
81.4%$29M
Product
18.6%$7M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
ARDXArdelyx, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$378M
Product, IBSRELA
41.7%$274M
License
0.8%$5M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGARDX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XFOR's -11.1%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXFOR logoXFORX4 Pharmaceutical…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9M$0$280.3B$428M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$97M-$532M$81.4B-$35M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$100M-$506M$57.0B-$58M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$73M-$407M$100.9B-$37M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+79.4%+60.0%+91.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.8%+25.9%-8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.1%+20.4%-13.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.1%+36.0%-8.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-90.6%+27.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.0%-14.1%+16.0%+11.8%+2.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — XFOR and JPM and ARDX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricXFOR logoXFORX4 Pharmaceutical…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$505M$6.9B$896.0B$1.4B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$365M$6.0B$1.50T$1.5B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.14x-12.14x16.00x-21.88x-19.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue14.39x3.20x3.43x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x7.19x2.47x8.21x6.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — XFOR and JPM and ARDX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-95 for XFOR. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXFOR logoXFORX4 Pharmaceutical…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-94.9%-68.2%+15.9%-38.1%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-48.1%-62.2%+1.3%-11.8%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-143.1%+4.5%-10.7%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-45.9%-68.3%+8.9%-10.6%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942533
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.00x2.60x1.27x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$140M-$902M$599.0B$144M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$217M$902M$343.3B$68M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77M$72,000$942.4B$212M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.10x0.74x-0.28x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $159 for XFOR. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs XFOR's -61.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXFOR logoXFORX4 Pharmaceutical…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.8%+29.8%-0.5%-7.5%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+110.9%+21.8%+53.0%+491.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.1%+55.0%+138.2%+42.6%+1757.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%+213.0%+118.2%+207.6%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+237.9%+465.8%+162.2%-36.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-61.1%+15.7%+33.6%+12.6%+164.8%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XFOR's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ARDX's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXFOR logoXFORX4 Pharmaceutical…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.35x1.66x0.94x1.01x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.83$36.27$337.25$8.40$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.35$14.32$262.71$3.49$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.8%+92.7%+95.1%+67.7%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.557.959.145.031.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded390K1.9M7.0M3.4M396K
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: XFOR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 200.0% upside for XFOR (target: $12) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXFOR logoXFORX4 Pharmaceutical…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.00$43.67$339.75$17.00$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts1323611616
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XFOR vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(XFOR) is the stronger pick with 1273% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -98. 4% for X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus XFOR's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning XFOR is approximately 149% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(XFOR) is pulling ahead at 1273% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 66. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 9% for Ardelyx, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -225. 6% for X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -247. 4% for XFOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARDX leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XFOR: 200.

0% to $12. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. XFOR, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is XFOR or IMVT or JPM or ARDX or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, XFOR: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between XFOR and IMVT and JPM and ARDX and PRAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (XFOR (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and ARDX (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XFOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while XFOR, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.