REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XHR vs SHO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
XHR vs SHO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $1.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $986M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $67M | $38M |
| Gross Margin | -5.8% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 50.0x | 129.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $925M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $109M |
XHR vs SHO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenia Hotels & Reso… (XHR) | 100 | 186.0 | +86.0% |
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 115.8 | +15.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHR vs SHO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 326.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- 44.7% 10Y total return vs SHO's 12.0%
- Lower P/E (50.0x vs 129.9x)
SHO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- Beta 1.00, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.30x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs XHR's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (50.0x vs 129.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs SHO's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs XHR's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs XHR's 3.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.1% vs SHO's +27.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs SHO's 1.3%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.0% |
XHR vs SHO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XHR vs SHO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XHR and SHO operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $986M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.2% (XHR) to 3.8% (SHO). On growth, SHO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $986M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $190M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $67M | $38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.2x trailing earnings, XHR trades at a 89% valuation discount to SHO's 242.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XHR's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHO's 13.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.16x | 242.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.97x | 129.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.92x | 13.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.18x | 24.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XHR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XHR delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $2 for SHO. SHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XHR's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XHR scores 7/9 vs SHO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $816M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $925M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XHR five years ago would be worth $9,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,226 for SHO. Over the past 12 months, XHR leads with a +54.1% total return vs SHO's +27.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XHR at 12.8% vs SHO's 3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | +13.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.1% | +27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.4% | +9.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | -7.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.7% | +12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | +3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHO is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XHR's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.23 | $10.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.15 | $8.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.8 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 675K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
SHO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XHR as "Hold" and SHO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.4% upside for SHO (target: $11) vs 1.6% for XHR (target: $17). For income investors, SHO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.34% vs XHR's 3.33%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +5.6% |
SHO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). XHR leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
XHR vs SHO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHR or SHO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) offers the better valuation at 26. 2x trailing P/E (50. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XHR or SHO?
On trailing P/E, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the cheapest at 26. 2x versus Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. at 242. 3x. On forward P/E, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 50. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XHR or SHO?
Over the past 5 years, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) delivered a total return of -1. 1%, compared to -7. 7% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XHR returned +44. 7% versus SHO's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XHR or SHO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning XHR is approximately 5% more volatile than SHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 121% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XHR or SHO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus 3. 8% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 326. 7% year-over-year, compared to -69. 8% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XHR leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XHR or SHO?
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XHR leads at 9. 9% versus 7. 8% for SHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHO leads at 4. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XHR or SHO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) trades at 50. 0x forward P/E versus 129. 9x for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — 79. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHO: 2. 4% to $10. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — XHR or SHO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 3. 3% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR).
09Is XHR or SHO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHO: +12. 0%, XHR: +44. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XHR and SHO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.