Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.95B
5Y Perf.-10.2%
VELO
Velo3D, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$301M
5Y Perf.+26.0%
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-81.8%
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • IL
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.-95.2%
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$573M
5Y Perf.-81.4%

XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XMTR logoXMTR
VELO logoVELO
UPWK logoUPWK
FVRR logoFVRR
TASK logoTASK
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryComputer HardwareStaffing & Employment ServicesInternet Content & InformationInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$3.95B$301M$1.38B$422M$573M
Revenue (TTM)$741M$49M$595M$429M$1.21B
Net Income (TTM)$-52M$-73M$109M$29M$105M
Gross Margin39.3%-1.8%103.0%81.3%35.5%
Operating Margin-4.8%-114.5%20.7%2.9%11.6%
Forward P/E117.0x7.4x5.7x4.6x
Total Debt$349M$6.30B$381M$5M$298M
Cash & Equiv.$15M$39.01B$298M$129M$212M

XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XMTR
VELO
UPWK
FVRR
TASK
StockJun 21May 26Return
Xometry, Inc. (XMTR)10089.8-10.2%
Velo3D, Inc. (VELO)100126.0+26.0%
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10018.2-81.8%
Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)1004.8-95.2%
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)10018.6-81.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TASK leads in 2 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Xometry, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. VELO, UPWK, and FVRR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
The Income Pick

XMTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.94
  • +162.1% vs FVRR's -59.7%
Best for: income & stability
VELO
Velo3D, Inc.
The Growth Play

VELO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 95.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • 21.7% 10Y total return vs XMTR's -10.2%
  • 1.1K% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Quality Compounder

UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 18.3% margin vs VELO's -148.4%
Best for: quality
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

FVRR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.97 vs VELO's 3.88, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

TASK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.

  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 3.12x
  • Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.4x)
  • 10.3% ROA vs VELO's -82.6%, ROIC 16.3% vs -15.0%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVELO logoVELO1.1K% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
ValueTASK logoTASKLower P/E (4.6x vs 7.4x)
Quality / MarginsUPWK logoUPWK18.3% margin vs VELO's -148.4%
Stability / SafetyFVRR logoFVRRBeta 0.97 vs VELO's 3.88, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)XMTR logoXMTR+162.1% vs FVRR's -59.7%
Efficiency (ROA)TASK logoTASK10.3% ROA vs VELO's -82.6%, ROIC 16.3% vs -15.0%

XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XMTRXometry, Inc.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
91.7%$630M
Service
8.3%$57M
VELOVelo3D, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M
FVRRFiverr International Ltd.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
69.0%$297M
Services Revenue
31.0%$133M
TASKTaskUs, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Customer Experience
75.5%$662M
AI Services
24.5%$214M

XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXMTRLAGGINGFVRR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TASK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 24.7x VELO's $49M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VELO's -148.4%. On growth, VELO holds the edge at +65.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$741M$49M$595M$429M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$21M-$53M$150M$26M$204M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$52M-$73M$109M$29M$105M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M-$24M$224M$103M$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.3%-1.8%+103.0%+81.3%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.8%-114.5%+20.7%+2.9%+11.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%-148.4%+18.3%+6.7%+8.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.5%-48.6%+37.7%+24.1%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.9%+65.4%-100.0%-1.6%+10.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+98.1%+29.6%+9.7%+13.0%
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to FVRR's 21.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TASK's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FVRR's 22.1x.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.0B$301M$1.4B$422M$573M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.3B-$32.4B$1.5B$299M$660M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-64.34x-2.82x12.78x20.98x5.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.116.97x7.37x5.68x4.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.66x22.11x3.26x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.76x0.01x1.76x0.98x0.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.41x5.28x2.35x1.06x0.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.71x4.06x7.78x
TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TASK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-2 for VELO. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs VELO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-18.8%-2.3%+17.9%+7.0%+21.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.3%-82.6%+8.5%+3.1%+10.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.7%-15.0%+14.3%-0.2%+16.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.5%-153.4%+16.2%-0.3%+16.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933687
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.26x0.17x0.60x0.01x0.50x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$334M-$32.7B$83M-$124M$86M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$39.0B$298M$129M$212M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$349M$6.3B$381M$5M$298M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-20.58x-19.11x146.13x7.12x
TASK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VELO five years ago would be worth $12,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +162.1% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 81.1% vs FVRR's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.1%-26.2%-46.5%-40.3%-12.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+162.1%+107.3%-34.8%-59.7%-28.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+493.8%+107.3%+32.0%-58.1%-18.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.2%+25.4%-74.8%-93.5%-67.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.2%+21.7%-49.9%-70.6%-67.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+81.1%+27.5%+9.7%-25.2%-6.4%
XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XMTR and FVRR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VELO's 3.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.94x3.88x1.16x0.97x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$82.11$23.84$22.84$34.13$18.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.60$2.81$10.02$9.67$5.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.6%+51.3%+46.5%+34.4%+34.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.852.535.052.942.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded840K2.3M3.4M924K736K
Evenly matched — XMTR and FVRR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

XMTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: XMTR as "Buy", VELO as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", FVRR as "Hold", TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs -18.1% for XMTR (target: $64).

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$64.33$20.33$23.14$16.83$13.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts141231711
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%+9.8%+7.7%+4.8%
XMTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TASK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). XMTR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallXometry, Inc. (XMTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Velo3D, Inc.

(VELO) is the stronger pick with 1120% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Fiverr International Ltd. at 21. 0x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

Over the past 5 years, Velo3D, Inc.

(VELO) delivered a total return of +25. 4%, compared to -93. 5% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VELO returned +21. 7% versus FVRR's -70. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Velo3D, Inc. 's 3. 88β — meaning VELO is approximately 301% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Velo3D, Inc.

(VELO) is pulling ahead at 1120% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VELO leads at 735. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -155. 2% for Velo3D, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -119. 5% for VELO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 117. 0x for Xometry, Inc. — 112. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Velo3D, Inc. (VELO) carries a higher beta of 3. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -70. 6%, VELO: +21. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XMTR and VELO and UPWK and FVRR and TASK?

These companies operate in different sectors (XMTR (Industrials) and VELO (Technology) and UPWK (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services) and TASK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VELO is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XMTR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VELO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FVRR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TASK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XMTR and VELO and UPWK and FVRR and TASK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XMTR: 35.9% · VELO: 65.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.