Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Staffing & Employment Services
Internet Content & Information
Information Technology Services
XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Computer Hardware | Staffing & Employment Services | Internet Content & Information | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.95B | $301M | $1.38B | $422M | $573M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $741M | $49M | $595M | $429M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $-73M | $109M | $29M | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | -1.8% | 103.0% | 81.3% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | -114.5% | 20.7% | 2.9% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | 117.0x | — | 7.4x | 5.7x | 4.6x |
| Total Debt | $349M | $6.30B | $381M | $5M | $298M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $39.01B | $298M | $129M | $212M |
XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Velo3D, Inc. (VELO) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 18.2 | -81.8% |
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XMTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.94
- +162.1% vs FVRR's -59.7%
VELO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 95.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 21.7% 10Y total return vs XMTR's -10.2%
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 18.3% margin vs VELO's -148.4%
FVRR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.97 vs VELO's 3.88, lower leverage
TASK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 3.12x
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.4x)
- 10.3% ROA vs VELO's -82.6%, ROIC 16.3% vs -15.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs VELO's -148.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs VELO's 3.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.1% vs FVRR's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs VELO's -82.6%, ROIC 16.3% vs -15.0% |
XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TASK leads in 2 of 6 categories
XMTR leads 2 • UPWK leads 1 • VELO leads 0 • FVRR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TASK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 24.7x VELO's $49M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VELO's -148.4%. On growth, VELO holds the edge at +65.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $741M | $49M | $595M | $429M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$53M | $150M | $26M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | -$73M | $109M | $29M | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$24M | $224M | $103M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | -1.8% | +103.0% | +81.3% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -114.5% | +20.7% | +2.9% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | -148.4% | +18.3% | +6.7% | +8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -48.6% | +37.7% | +24.1% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.9% | +65.4% | -100.0% | -1.6% | +10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +98.1% | +29.6% | +9.7% | +13.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to FVRR's 21.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TASK's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FVRR's 22.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $301M | $1.4B | $422M | $573M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | -$32.4B | $1.5B | $299M | $660M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -64.34x | -2.82x | 12.78x | 20.98x | 5.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 116.97x | — | 7.37x | 5.68x | 4.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.66x | 22.11x | 3.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.76x | 0.01x | 1.76x | 0.98x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.41x | 5.28x | 2.35x | 1.06x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 5.71x | 4.06x | 7.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-2 for VELO. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs VELO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.8% | -2.3% | +17.9% | +7.0% | +21.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | -82.6% | +8.5% | +3.1% | +10.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | -15.0% | +14.3% | -0.2% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | -153.4% | +16.2% | -0.3% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.26x | 0.17x | 0.60x | 0.01x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | -$32.7B | $83M | -$124M | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $39.0B | $298M | $129M | $212M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349M | $6.3B | $381M | $5M | $298M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.58x | -19.11x | 146.13x | — | 7.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VELO five years ago would be worth $12,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +162.1% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 81.1% vs FVRR's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.1% | -26.2% | -46.5% | -40.3% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +162.1% | +107.3% | -34.8% | -59.7% | -28.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +493.8% | +107.3% | +32.0% | -58.1% | -18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +25.4% | -74.8% | -93.5% | -67.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +21.7% | -49.9% | -70.6% | -67.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +81.1% | +27.5% | +9.7% | -25.2% | -6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XMTR and FVRR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VELO's 3.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 3.88x | 1.16x | 0.97x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.11 | $23.84 | $22.84 | $34.13 | $18.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.60 | $2.81 | $10.02 | $9.67 | $5.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +51.3% | +46.5% | +34.4% | +34.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 52.5 | 35.0 | 52.9 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 840K | 2.3M | 3.4M | 924K | 736K |
Analyst Outlook
XMTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XMTR as "Buy", VELO as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", FVRR as "Hold", TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs -18.1% for XMTR (target: $64).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.33 | $20.33 | $23.14 | $16.83 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 1 | 23 | 17 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +9.8% | +7.7% | +4.8% |
TASK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). XMTR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
XMTR vs VELO vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Velo3D, Inc.
(VELO) is the stronger pick with 1120% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Fiverr International Ltd. at 21. 0x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?
Over the past 5 years, Velo3D, Inc.
(VELO) delivered a total return of +25. 4%, compared to -93. 5% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VELO returned +21. 7% versus FVRR's -70. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Velo3D, Inc. 's 3. 88β — meaning VELO is approximately 301% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Velo3D, Inc.
(VELO) is pulling ahead at 1120% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VELO leads at 735. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -155. 2% for Velo3D, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -119. 5% for VELO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 117. 0x for Xometry, Inc. — 112. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XMTR or VELO or UPWK or FVRR or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Velo3D, Inc. (VELO) carries a higher beta of 3. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -70. 6%, VELO: +21. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XMTR and VELO and UPWK and FVRR and TASK?
These companies operate in different sectors (XMTR (Industrials) and VELO (Technology) and UPWK (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services) and TASK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VELO is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.