Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Entertainment
XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $80M | $2.16B | $142M | $481M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $402M | $10.29B | $4.20B | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.27B | $800M | $-202M | $-153M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 37.7% | 9.2% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | 12.7% | -7.1% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 66.3x | 1.1x | 4.3x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $129M | $16M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $177M | $5.44B | $1.02B | $1.19B |
XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xunlei Limited (XNET) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XNET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs MOMO's -9.4%
- 315.3% margin vs DOYU's -4.8%
- +46.2% vs DOYU's -34.2%
- 124.7% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC -6.8% vs -15.4%
MOMO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth -17.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- -5.9% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x)
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HUYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.9% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 315.3% margin vs DOYU's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs XNET's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs DOYU's -34.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 124.7% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC -6.8% vs -15.4% |
XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XNET leads in 2 of 6 categories
DOYU leads 2 • MOMO leads 2 • HUYA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 25.6x XNET's $402M. XNET is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOYU's -4.8%. On growth, XNET holds the edge at +57.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $402M | $10.3B | $4.2B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $710M | $1.4B | -$275M | -$120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $800M | -$202M | -$153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $685M | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +37.7% | +9.2% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +12.7% | -7.1% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +7.8% | -4.8% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +6.7% | -5.9% | -1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | -5.1% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +592.1% | +32.1% | +179.1% | -118.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 86% valuation discount to XNET's 66.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $2.2B | $142M | $481M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$67M | $1.4B | -$5M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 66.32x | 9.34x | -3.31x | -103.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.08x | 4.28x | 3.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.91x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 1.46x | 0.23x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 0.66x | 0.23x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.55x | 21.90x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XNET delivers a 154.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $155 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DOYU. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XNET's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +154.7% | +7.2% | -6.5% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +124.7% | +5.3% | -4.7% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.8% | +10.9% | -15.4% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.6% | +10.8% | -10.3% | -2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$148M | -$5.3B | -$1.0B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $177M | $5.4B | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $129M | $16M | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 996.72x | 18.04x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XNET five years ago would be worth $13,347 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,841 for DOYU. Over the past 12 months, XNET leads with a +46.2% total return vs DOYU's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XNET at 57.9% vs MOMO's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | +1.6% | -31.8% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | +16.2% | -34.2% | +26.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.8% | -5.7% | +125.5% | +99.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.5% | -36.7% | -71.6% | -60.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | -9.4% | -78.8% | -60.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.9% | -1.9% | +31.1% | +25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XNET's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs DOYU's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.78x | 1.10x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.03 | $9.22 | $9.34 | $4.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.02 | $5.68 | $4.28 | $2.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.1% | +68.8% | +50.3% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 61.2 | 47.0 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 648K | 26K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XNET as "Buy", MOMO as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold", HUYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MOMO's 4.61%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.10 | $9.03 | $3.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 16 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.6% | +100.0% | +56.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 | $68.16 | $12.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.6% | +5.1% | +10.9% | +7.6% |
XNET leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DOYU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
XNET vs MOMO vs DOYU vs HUYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger pick with -5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xunlei Limited (XNET) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Xunlei Limited at 66. 3x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA?
Over the past 5 years, Xunlei Limited (XNET) delivered a total return of +33.
5%, compared to -71. 6% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XNET returned +5. 5% versus DOYU's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Xunlei Limited's 2. 04β — meaning XNET is approximately 161% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Xunlei Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is pulling ahead at -5. 9% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XNET leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -7. 0% for DouYu International Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -13. 2% for DOYU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XNET leads at 51. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. XNET does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XNET or MOMO or DOYU or HUYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Xunlei Limited (XNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, XNET: +5. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XNET and MOMO and DOYU and HUYA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MOMO, DOYU, HUYA pay a dividend while XNET does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 28%
- Net Margin > 189%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.