Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XOMAP
XOMA Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$306M
5Y Perf.+1.4%
NUVB
Nuvation Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.67B
5Y Perf.-58.8%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.-59.6%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.-41.1%

XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XOMAP logoXOMAP
NUVB logoNUVB
PRAX logoPRAX
IMVT logoIMVT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$306M$1.67B$9.63B$5.53B
Revenue (TTM)$52M$143M$-92K$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$32M$-146M$-327M$-464M
Gross Margin94.3%91.6%
Operating Margin21.8%-105.0%
Forward P/E22.5x
Total Debt$132M$10M$110K$98K
Cash & Equiv.$83M$164M$357M$714M

XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XOMAP
NUVB
PRAX
IMVT
StockDec 20May 26Return
XOMA Corporation (XOMAP)100101.4+1.4%
Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB)10041.2-58.8%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10040.4-59.6%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10058.9-41.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: XOMAP leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Nuvation Bio Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XOMAP
XOMA Corporation
The Income Pick

XOMAP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 1.2%
  • 60.8% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
  • Beta 0.03 vs NUVB's 2.04
  • 1.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
NUVB
Nuvation Bio Inc.
The Growth Play

NUVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
  • 7.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +7.7% vs XOMAP's +6.9%
Best for: momentum
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 173.6% 10Y total return vs XOMAP's 50.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
  • Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNUVB logoNUVB7.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsXOMAP logoXOMAP60.8% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
Stability / SafetyXOMAP logoXOMAPBeta 0.03 vs NUVB's 2.04
DividendsXOMAP logoXOMAP1.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs XOMAP's +6.9%
Efficiency (ROA)XOMAP logoXOMAP13.0% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%

XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XOMAPXOMA Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

NUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
FY 2025
License
60.8%$38M
Product
39.2%$25M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXOMAPLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

XOMAP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NUVB and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $143M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. XOMAP is the more profitable business, keeping 60.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXOMAP logoXOMAPXOMA CorporationNUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$52M$143M-$92,000$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M-$145M-$357M-$487M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$32M-$146M-$327M-$464M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M-$126M-$283M-$423M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.3%+91.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.8%-105.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+60.8%-102.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.4%-88.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.9%+26.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-68.3%+106.3%+2.7%+19.7%
XOMAP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

XOMAP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricXOMAP logoXOMAPXOMA CorporationNUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$306M$1.7B$9.6B$5.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$355M$1.5B$9.3B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.35x-8.03x-24.72x-9.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.30x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple24.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.87x26.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.38x5.38x8.54x5.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF106.58x
XOMAP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

XOMAP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

XOMAP delivers a 32.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOMAP's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XOMAP scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXOMAP logoXOMAPXOMA CorporationNUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+32.6%-44.1%-43.0%-47.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.0%-23.8%-40.2%-44.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%-54.3%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.2%-42.8%-49.3%-66.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95432
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.27x0.03x0.00x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$49M-$154M-$357M-$714M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$83M$164M$357M$714M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$132M$10M$110,000$98,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.47x-162.11x
XOMAP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,173 for NUVB. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs XOMAP's +6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs XOMAP's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXOMAP logoXOMAPXOMA CorporationNUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.6%-43.8%+16.4%+5.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+6.9%+136.3%+775.0%+96.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+31.2%+197.5%+1976.5%+40.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.5%-58.3%-20.8%+62.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.9%-51.8%-20.1%+173.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.5%+43.8%+174.9%+12.1%
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XOMAP and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOMAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs NUVB's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXOMAP logoXOMAPXOMA CorporationNUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.03x2.04x1.55x1.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$30.00$9.75$356.00$30.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.14$1.57$35.18$13.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.4%+49.4%+93.6%+90.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.459.155.660.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2K4.3M378K1.4M
Evenly matched — XOMAP and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: XOMAP as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.3% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 63.3% for PRAX (target: $544). XOMAP is the only dividend payer here at 1.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXOMAP logoXOMAPXOMA CorporationNUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.40$544.40$45.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts991623
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

XOMAP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallXOMA Corporation (XOMAP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XOMAP vs NUVB vs PRAX vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.

(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). XOMA Corporation (XOMAP) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XOMA Corporation (XOMAP) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -58. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus NUVB's -51. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XOMA Corporation (XOMAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

03β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NUVB is approximately 5946% more volatile than XOMAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for XOMA Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.

(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XOMA Corporation grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT?

XOMA Corporation (XOMAP) is the more profitable company, earning 60.

8% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOMAP leads at 21. 8% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOMAP leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 157.

3% to $12. 40.

07

Which pays a better dividend — XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT?

In this comparison, XOMAP (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NUVB, PRAX, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is XOMAP or NUVB or PRAX or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, XOMA Corporation (XOMAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

03), 1. 2% yield). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOMAP: +50. 9%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between XOMAP and NUVB and PRAX and IMVT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: XOMAP is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. XOMAP pays a dividend while NUVB, PRAX, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XOMAP

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NUVB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1299%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XOMAP and NUVB and PRAX and IMVT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XOMAP: 57.9% · NUVB: 2598.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.