Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
Banks - Diversified
XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $7.80B | $2.71B | $94.80B | $1.73B | $54.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.87B | $10.82B | $28.89B | $19.82B | $11.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.05B | $2.29B | $2.00B | $2.13B | $2.53B |
| Gross Margin | 9.5% | 68.4% | 44.5% | 50.8% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | -19.7% | 38.6% | 11.1% | 37.5% | 25.2% |
| Forward P/E | 1.7x | 1.0x | 39.2x | 1.1x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $115.13B | $17.57B | $11.39B | $34.86B | $887M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.61B | $4.82B | $3.67B | $1.86B | $13.64B |
XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XP Inc. (XP) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
| StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 138.7 | +38.7% |
| PagSeguro Digital L… (PAGS) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) | 100 | 152.0 | +52.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.
- 22.7% margin vs MELI's 6.9%
- +19.8% vs MELI's -17.3%
STNE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs PAGS's 0.09
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 16.4x)
MELI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs NU's 38.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 1.20 vs PAGS's 1.70, lower leverage
- 5.7% ROA vs XP's 1.3%, ROIC 20.8% vs -2.6%
PAGS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 4.1%
- Beta 1.70, yield 4.1%, current ratio 1.36x
- 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs XP's 4.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.8%, EPS growth 90.5%
- 44.8% NII/revenue growth vs STNE's -74.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.8% NII/revenue growth vs STNE's -74.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs MELI's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs PAGS's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs XP's 4.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.8% vs MELI's -17.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs XP's 1.3%, ROIC 20.8% vs -2.6% |
XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NU leads in 2 of 6 categories
STNE leads 1 • PAGS leads 1 • XP leads 0 • MELI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MELI is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.9B annually — 2.7x STNE's $10.8B. XP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MELI's 6.9%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.9B | $10.8B | $28.9B | $19.8B | $11.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.7B | $5.2B | $4.0B | $8.8B | $3.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.1B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17.9B | -$241M | $10.1B | $708M | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +68.4% | +44.5% | +50.8% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.7% | +38.6% | +11.1% | +37.5% | +25.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +21.1% | +6.9% | +10.7% | +17.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.6% | -2.2% | +35.0% | +3.6% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -77.4% | +44.6% | +6.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +119.7% | -12.5% | -8.4% | +45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STNE and PAGS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, STNE trades at a 86% valuation discount to MELI's 47.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNE offers better value at 0.28x vs PAGS's 0.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $2.7B | $94.8B | $1.7B | $54.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.9B | $5.3B | $102.5B | $8.4B | $41.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.30x | 6.56x | 47.47x | 7.20x | 35.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.69x | 1.03x | 39.21x | 1.14x | 16.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | 0.28x | — | 0.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 27.18x | 5.72x | 14.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.94x | 4.04x | 3.28x | 0.44x | 4.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.54x | 1.35x | 14.05x | 1.02x | 9.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.56x | — | 8.80x | 5.50x | 24.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $14 for PAGS. NU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XP's 5.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAGS scores 7/9 vs XP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.4% | +19.9% | +33.7% | +14.4% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +4.0% | +5.7% | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | -10.4% | +20.8% | +10.7% | +26.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | -13.9% | +28.3% | +25.6% | +27.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.74x | 1.59x | 1.69x | 2.38x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109.5B | $12.8B | $7.7B | $33.0B | -$12.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.6B | $4.8B | $3.7B | $1.9B | $13.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $115.1B | $17.6B | $11.4B | $34.9B | $887M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.55x | 1.59x | 17.53x | 1.50x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NU five years ago would be worth $13,804 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,172 for STNE. Over the past 12 months, XP leads with a +19.8% total return vs MELI's -17.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NU at 34.0% vs PAGS's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.1% | -7.6% | -5.3% | +8.6% | -16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.8% | +2.6% | -17.3% | +13.9% | +15.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.8% | -1.7% | +45.6% | -3.9% | +140.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.2% | -78.3% | +26.2% | -74.9% | +38.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | -56.7% | +1370.4% | -62.7% | +38.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.1% | -0.6% | +13.3% | -1.3% | +34.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MELI and PAGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MELI is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAGS's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAGS currently trades 82.1% from its 52-week high vs STNE's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 1.67x | 1.20x | 1.70x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.11 | $19.95 | $2645.22 | $12.32 | $18.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.51 | $10.74 | $1593.21 | $7.74 | $11.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.3% | +55.3% | +70.7% | +82.1% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 33.8 | 54.8 | 51.3 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 5.3M | 472K | 3.7M | 48.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PAGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XP as "Buy", STNE as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", PAGS as "Buy", NU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.1% upside for STNE (target: $19) vs 20.4% for PAGS (target: $12). For income investors, PAGS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.05% vs XP's 3.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.50 | $19.00 | $2420.00 | $12.18 | $20.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 21 | 33 | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | — | — | +4.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.72 | — | — | $2.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +21.8% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). STNE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
XP vs STNE vs MELI vs PAGS vs NU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nu Holdings Ltd.
(NU) is the stronger pick with 44. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 0% for StoneCo Ltd. (STNE). StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (1. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XP Inc. (XP) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU?
On trailing P/E, StoneCo Ltd.
(STNE) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus MercadoLibre, Inc. at 47. 5x. On forward P/E, StoneCo Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: StoneCo Ltd. wins at 0. 04x versus PagSeguro Digital Ltd. 's 0. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU?
Over the past 5 years, Nu Holdings Ltd.
(NU) delivered a total return of +38. 0%, compared to -78. 3% for StoneCo Ltd. (STNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1370% versus PAGS's -62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus PagSeguro Digital Ltd. 's 1. 70β — meaning PAGS is approximately 41% more volatile than MELI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 6% for XP Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nu Holdings Ltd.
(NU) is pulling ahead at 44. 8% versus -74. 0% for StoneCo Ltd. (STNE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: StoneCo Ltd. grew EPS 265. 9% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for MercadoLibre, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU?
StoneCo Ltd.
(STNE) is the more profitable company, earning 68. 6% net margin versus 6. 9% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — meaning it keeps 68. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAGS leads at 37. 5% versus -90. 2% for STNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAGS leads at 50. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus PagSeguro Digital Ltd. 's 0. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 38. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNE: 72. 1% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU?
In this comparison, PAGS (4.
1% yield), XP (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. STNE, MELI, NU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XP or STNE or MELI or PAGS or NU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1370% 10Y return). StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1370%, STNE: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XP and STNE and MELI and PAGS and NU?
These companies operate in different sectors (XP (Financial Services) and STNE (Technology) and MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and PAGS (Technology) and NU (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XP is a small-cap high-growth stock; STNE is a small-cap deep-value stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAGS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. XP, PAGS pay a dividend while STNE, MELI, NU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.