Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Construction
Industrial - Machinery
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Construction | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $220M | $2.83B | $10.58B | $444M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $771M | $4.17B | $1.62B | $1.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $53M | $2M | $202M | $118M | $24M |
| Gross Margin | 42.5% | 19.2% | 24.1% | 26.2% | 12.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 6.1% | 7.0% | 10.4% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 15.3x | 13.4x | 65.3x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $201M | $1.24B | $433M | $670M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $9M | $223M | $13K | $45M |
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) | 100 | 294.4 | +194.4% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| LCI Industries (LCII) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
| AAON, Inc. (AAON) | 100 | 357.9 | +257.9% |
| Park-Ohio Holdings … (PKOH) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XPEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 8.0%, current ratio 3.25x
- PEG 0.90 vs AAON's 12.01
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 65.3x), PEG 0.90 vs 12.01
- 10.8% margin vs MPAA's 0.3%
MPAA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.99 vs AAON's 1.83
LCII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 3.9%
- Beta 0.99, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.85x
- 3.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PKOH's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
AAON is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth -36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs XPEL's 7.1%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs PKOH's -3.4%
PKOH is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.8% vs XPEL's +23.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs PKOH's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 65.3x), PEG 0.90 vs 12.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs AAON's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PKOH's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.8% vs XPEL's +23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 19.5% vs 6.2% |
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XPEL leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPAA leads 1 • LCII leads 1 • AAON leads 0 • PKOH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LCII is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 8.5x XPEL's $490M. XPEL is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPAA's 0.3%. On growth, AAON holds the edge at +54.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $771M | $4.2B | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $77M | $49M | $385M | $228M | $105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $53M | $2M | $202M | $118M | $24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $30M | $245M | -$145M | $1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +19.2% | +24.1% | +26.2% | +12.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +6.1% | +7.0% | +10.4% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +0.3% | +4.8% | +7.3% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +3.9% | +5.9% | -9.0% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.1% | -9.9% | +4.3% | +54.3% | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | -18.2% | +30.4% | +37.1% | -3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, LCII trades at a 85% valuation discount to AAON's 100.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XPEL offers better value at 1.04x vs AAON's 18.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $220M | $2.8B | $10.6B | $444M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $412M | $3.8B | $11.0B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.76x | -11.59x | 15.38x | 100.19x | 18.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.70x | 15.29x | 13.38x | 65.28x | 9.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.04x | — | 4.01x | 18.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.62x | 8.19x | 9.57x | 48.81x | 9.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 0.29x | 0.69x | 7.34x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.27x | 0.88x | 2.13x | 12.00x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.28x | 5.39x | 10.16x | — | 222.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XPEL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPEL delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for MPAA. XPEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PKOH's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LCII scores 8/9 vs AAON's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +0.8% | +14.7% | +13.4% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | +0.2% | +6.3% | +7.4% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.5% | +6.2% | +9.1% | +9.4% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.2% | +6.6% | +10.8% | +12.4% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.78x | 0.91x | 0.48x | 1.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $192M | $1.0B | $433M | $626M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $9M | $223M | $13,000 | $45M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $201M | $1.2B | $433M | $670M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4060.77x | 0.94x | 5.49x | 11.27x | 2.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MPAA and AAON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAON five years ago would be worth $29,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,829 for MPAA. Over the past 12 months, PKOH leads with a +60.8% total return vs XPEL's +23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 34.5% vs XPEL's -14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | -7.2% | -5.4% | +63.3% | +49.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +24.3% | +45.6% | +35.5% | +60.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | +143.5% | +11.2% | +101.6% | +107.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | -51.7% | -6.1% | +196.3% | -12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +712.6% | -62.7% | +111.5% | +612.1% | +45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.5% | +34.5% | +3.6% | +26.3% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MPAA and LCII and PKOH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAON's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PKOH currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 63.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.99x | 0.99x | 1.83x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.91 | $18.12 | $159.66 | $148.88 | $31.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.26 | $9.09 | $82.29 | $62.00 | $15.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +63.3% | +72.9% | +86.8% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 58.0 | 45.6 | 59.4 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 267K | 87K | 352K | 965K | 44K |
Analyst Outlook
LCII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPEL as "Buy", MPAA as "Buy", LCII as "Hold", AAON as "Buy", PKOH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs -7.9% for AAON (target: $119). For income investors, LCII offers the higher dividend yield at 3.94% vs AAON's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $20.00 | $150.60 | $119.00 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 7 | 14 | 5 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.9% | +0.3% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 9 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.59 | $0.39 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +2.2% | +4.5% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
XPEL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII vs AAON vs PKOH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH). LCI Industries (LCII) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH?
On trailing P/E, LCI Industries (LCII) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus AAON, Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPEL, Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH?
Over the past 5 years, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) delivered a total return of +196. 3%, compared to -51. 7% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPEL returned +712. 6% versus MPAA's -62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus AAON, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning AAON is approximately 85% more volatile than MPAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 174% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -3. 4% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -46. 7% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAON leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH?
XPEL, Inc.
(XPEL) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPEL leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 1% for PKOH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPEL leads at 42. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 65. 3x for AAON, Inc. — 55. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 74. 4% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH?
In this comparison, LCII (3.
9% yield), PKOH (1. 8% yield), AAON (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. XPEL, MPAA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XPEL or MPAA or LCII or AAON or PKOH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LCI Industries (LCII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 3. 9% yield, +111. 5% 10Y return). AAON, Inc. (AAON) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LCII: +111. 5%, AAON: +612. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XPEL and MPAA and LCII and AAON and PKOH?
These companies operate in different sectors (XPEL (Consumer Cyclical) and MPAA (Consumer Cyclical) and LCII (Consumer Cyclical) and AAON (Industrials) and PKOH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XPEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LCII is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PKOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LCII, PKOH pay a dividend while XPEL, MPAA, AAON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.