Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XPL
Solitario Zinc Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$79M
5Y Perf.+175.5%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+215.0%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.+28.6%

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XPL logoXPL
CDE logoCDE
HL logoHL
USAS logoUSAS
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsGoldGoldIndustrial Materials
Market Cap$79M$11.63B$12.13B$2.03B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.57B$1.57B$109M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$799M$559M$-61M
Gross Margin35.4%50.9%3.3%
Operating Margin39.4%44.1%-25.5%
Forward P/E9.1x19.1x26.3x
Total Debt$7K$365M$299M$24M
Cash & Equiv.$82K$554M$242M$20M

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XPL
CDE
HL
USAS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL)100275.5+175.5%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100315.0+215.0%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
Americas Gold and S… (USAS)100128.6+28.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Coeur Mining, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. XPL and USAS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XPL
Solitario Zinc Corp.
The Defensive Pick

XPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 37.26x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 37.26x
  • Beta 0.97 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Income Pick

CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.81
  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 26.3x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs CDE's 149.9%
  • 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
  • 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
The Momentum Pick

USAS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +418.7% vs XPL's +41.1%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.1x vs 26.3x)
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
Stability / SafetyXPL logoXPLBeta 0.97 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
DividendsHL logoHL0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)USAS logoUSAS+418.7% vs XPL's +41.1%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XPLSolitario Zinc Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
USASAmericas Gold and Silver Corporation
FY 2023
Silver
49.0%$62M
Zinc
30.2%$38M
Lead
20.0%$25M
Other by-products
0.8%$1M

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDELAGGINGHL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDE and XPL operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.6B$1.6B$109M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$1.2B$853M-$7M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$799M$559M-$61M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$915M$472M-$52M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.4%+50.9%+3.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.4%+44.1%-25.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.1%+35.6%-56.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.6%+30.0%-47.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+137.8%+57.4%+45.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%-160.0%+55.3%
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 45% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…
Market CapShares × price$79M$11.6B$12.1B$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$79M$11.4B$12.2B$2.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.48x20.13x36.92x-15.19x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.10x19.07x26.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.19x17.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.62x8.53x20.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.03x3.56x4.58x12.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.48x39.11x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. XPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USAS's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs USAS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.1%+15.2%+22.5%-122.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.8%+11.2%+16.3%-26.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-14.1%+23.5%+15.3%-26.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-18.7%+23.9%+16.8%-21.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94683
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.11x0.12x0.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$75,000-$188M$57M$4M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$82,000$554M$242M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7,000$365M$299M$24M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense47.33x19.04x-18.89x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,625 for XPL. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs XPL's +41.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs XPL's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.6%+3.2%-4.1%+24.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.1%+216.1%+271.0%+418.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.1%+414.6%+194.9%+490.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+26.2%+96.0%+150.3%+35.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.0%+149.9%+360.6%-5.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.4%+72.6%+43.4%+80.8%
USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

XPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

XPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XPL currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x1.81x1.26x2.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.98$27.77$34.17$10.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.54$5.55$4.68$1.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.2%+65.2%+52.9%+60.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.149.346.656.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded308K22.2M15.4M5.8M
XPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold", USAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 31.7% for HL (target: $24).

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$23.83$9.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts21264
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). USAS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallCoeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XPL or CDE or HL or USAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to +26. 2% for Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus USAS's -5. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solitario Zinc Corp.

(XPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 139% more volatile than XPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 45% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XPL or CDE or HL or USAS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is XPL or CDE or HL or USAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Solitario Zinc Corp.

(XPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XPL: +64. 0%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XPL and CDE and HL and USAS?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: XPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.