Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $419K | $784M | $4.34B | $3.18B | $62.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $217M | $710M | $2.58B | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-115M | $-1.63B | $-42M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 22.1% | 99.8% | 11.7% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -70.9% | -35.8% | 38.1% | -1.8% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 123.5x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $95M | $997M | $391M | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $548K | $58M | $1M | $691M | $2.45B |
XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expion360 Inc. (XPON) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 32.6 | -67.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 14.8 | -85.2% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 263.5 | +163.5% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 1406.4 | +1306.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XPON lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NRGV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
PLUG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.55
- Lower volatility, beta 2.55, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 2.55, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 2.55 vs BE's 3.62
Among these 5 stocks, FLNC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs FLNC's -31.0%
- 0.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- +14.1% vs XPON's -28.9%
- 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.55 vs BE's 3.62 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.1% vs XPON's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9% |
XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
XPON leads 1 • NRGV leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • FLNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 274.4x XPON's $9M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (BE) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $217M | $710M | $2.6B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$72M | -$1.5B | -$19M | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$115M | -$1.6B | -$42M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$98M | -$2M | -$271M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +22.1% | +99.8% | +11.7% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -70.9% | -35.8% | +38.1% | -1.8% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -53.0% | -2.3% | -1.6% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -70.6% | -45.2% | -0.3% | -10.5% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +156.4% | +17.6% | +7.7% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.4% | -42.9% | +95.9% | +33.3% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
XPON leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419,221 | $784M | $4.3B | $3.2B | $62.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $900,743 | $820M | $5.3B | $2.9B | $63.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -6.97x | — | -65.30x | -705.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 123.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 513.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 3.85x | 6.12x | 1.40x | 31.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 8.21x | — | 5.74x | 79.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 1097.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. XPON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs FLNC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.7% | -146.8% | -124.4% | -8.3% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.2% | -40.3% | -64.3% | -1.8% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -97.6% | -49.5% | +10.9% | -15.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.2% | -53.7% | +18.6% | -5.7% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 1.07x | 19.75x | 0.71x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $481,522 | $36M | $996M | -$300M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $547,565 | $58M | $1M | $691M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $95M | $997M | $391M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -108.10x | -10.33x | -36.18x | — | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $129,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for XPON. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1414.1% total return vs XPON's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.8% vs XPON's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.3% | -7.4% | +39.9% | +5.0% | +164.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.9% | +475.7% | +266.9% | +401.2% | +1414.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +163.4% | -66.4% | +28.2% | +1440.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -53.6% | -84.5% | -31.0% | +1199.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -53.1% | +61.7% | -31.0% | +944.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.5% | +38.1% | -30.5% | +8.6% | +148.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLUG is the less volatile stock with a 2.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs XPON's 11.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.20x | 2.97x | 2.55x | 3.57x | 3.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.50 | $6.35 | $4.58 | $33.51 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.49 | $0.65 | $0.69 | $3.93 | $16.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.9% | +71.3% | +68.1% | +72.1% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 52.1 | 56.2 | 73.5 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 3.7M | 75.2M | 5.8M | 10.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", FLNC as "Hold", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.5% upside for NRGV (target: $7) vs -28.1% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $3.91 | $18.93 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 38 | 27 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). XPON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XPON vs NRGV vs PLUG vs FLNC vs BE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1199%, compared to -99.
9% for Expion360 Inc. (XPON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus XPON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 55β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately 42% more volatile than PLUG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expion360 Inc. (XPON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1847. 2% for Expion360 Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNC leads at 23. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE?
Fluence Energy, Inc.
(FLNC) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 1% net margin versus -239. 6% for Expion360 Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -120. 1% for XPON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NRGV: 54.
5% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is XPON or NRGV or PLUG or FLNC or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+944.
1% 10Y return). Expion360 Inc. (XPON) carries a higher beta of 3. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +944. 1%, XPON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XPON and NRGV and PLUG and FLNC and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (XPON (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials) and FLNC (Utilities) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XPON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.