Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XZO
Exzeo Group, Inc.

Insurance - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-2.4%
MFIN
Medallion Financial Corp.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$218M
5Y Perf.+298.3%
ENVA
Enova International, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.16B
5Y Perf.+1079.4%
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$523M
5Y Perf.-85.5%

XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XZO logoXZO
MFIN logoMFIN
ENVA logoENVA
TREE logoTREE
IndustryInsurance - DiversifiedFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Conglomerates
Market Cap$1.25B$218M$4.16B$523M
Revenue (TTM)$196M$353M$3.15B$1.12B
Net Income (TTM)$56M$47M$327M$181M
Gross Margin49.2%96.7%50.1%94.3%
Operating Margin37.0%50.5%23.5%7.3%
Forward P/E13.7x8.3x10.1x6.8x
Total Debt$7M$316M$4.56B$435M
Cash & Equiv.$305M$202M$72M$81M

XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XZO
MFIN
ENVA
TREE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Medallion Financial… (MFIN)100398.3+298.3%
Enova International… (ENVA)1001179.4+1079.4%
LendingTree, Inc. (TREE)10014.5-85.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MFIN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Exzeo Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ENVA and TREE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XZO
Exzeo Group, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

XZO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 62.0%, EPS growth 135.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.3%
  • 62.0% revenue growth vs ENVA's 18.6%
  • 28.7% margin vs ENVA's 9.8%
Best for: growth exposure
MFIN
Medallion Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 4.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 62.3%, current ratio 27.10x
  • Beta 1.14, yield 4.9%, current ratio 27.10x
  • Lower P/E (8.3x vs 10.1x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ENVA
Enova International, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ENVA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 21.7% 10Y total return vs MFIN's 42.9%
  • +70.9% vs XZO's -11.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.
The Banking Pick

TREE is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 21.8% ROA vs MFIN's 1.6%, ROIC 9.0% vs 17.2%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXZO logoXZO62.0% revenue growth vs ENVA's 18.6%
ValueMFIN logoMFINLower P/E (8.3x vs 10.1x)
Quality / MarginsXZO logoXZO28.7% margin vs ENVA's 9.8%
Stability / SafetyMFIN logoMFINBeta 1.14 vs TREE's 1.63, lower leverage
DividendsMFIN logoMFIN4.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ENVA logoENVA+70.9% vs XZO's -11.3%
Efficiency (ROA)TREE logoTREE21.8% ROA vs MFIN's 1.6%, ROIC 9.0% vs 17.2%

XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XZOExzeo Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Technology Service
100.0%$9M
MFINMedallion Financial Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

ENVAEnova International, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TREELendingTree, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Products And Services
100.0%$310,000

XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMFINLAGGINGTREE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 16.0x XZO's $196M. XZO is the more profitable business, keeping 28.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVA's 9.8%.

MetricXZO logoXZOExzeo Group, Inc.MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…ENVA logoENVAEnova Internation…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$196M$353M$3.2B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$75M$111M$815M$120M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$47M$327M$181M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$49M$126M$1.9B$73M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.2%+96.7%+50.1%+94.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.0%+50.5%+23.5%+7.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+28.7%+12.2%+9.8%+13.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.2%+35.7%+56.2%+5.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.3%+28.6%+2.3%
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MFIN and TREE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.5x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 78% valuation discount to XZO's 15.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENVA's 11.1x.

MetricXZO logoXZOExzeo Group, Inc.MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…ENVA logoENVAEnova Internation…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$218M$4.2B$523M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$953M$333M$8.7B$877M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.82x5.21x14.41x3.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.67x8.32x10.15x6.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.75x1.87x11.08x8.46x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.77x0.62x1.32x0.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.92x0.44x3.29x1.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.84x1.73x2.35x8.62x
Evenly matched — MFIN and TREE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

XZO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $9 for MFIN. XZO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XZO scores 7/9 vs TREE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXZO logoXZOExzeo Group, Inc.MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…ENVA logoENVAEnova Internation…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+30.9%+9.4%+24.9%+86.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.7%+1.6%+5.2%+21.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.2%+10.4%+9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+78.9%+10.0%+13.5%+13.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.62x3.41x1.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$298M$115M$4.5B$354M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$305M$202M$72M$81M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$316M$4.6B$435M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.07x79.01x4.45x
XZO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ENVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $48,767 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,258 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +70.9% total return vs XZO's -11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 57.9% vs XZO's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXZO logoXZOExzeo Group, Inc.MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…ENVA logoENVAEnova Internation…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.3%-6.3%+3.0%-26.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-11.3%+5.4%+70.9%-3.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.3%+59.2%+294.0%+114.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.3%+27.3%+387.7%-77.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.3%+42.9%+2173.6%-43.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.9%+16.8%+57.9%+28.9%
ENVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MFIN and ENVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MFIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs TREE's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXZO logoXZOExzeo Group, Inc.MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…ENVA logoENVAEnova Internation…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x1.48x1.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.82$11.00$176.68$77.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.10$7.88$89.00$32.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.2%+84.4%+94.5%+48.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.552.658.134.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded203K57K219K304K
Evenly matched — MFIN and ENVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MFIN as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy", TREE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs 19.5% for ENVA (target: $200). MFIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXZO logoXZOExzeo Group, Inc.MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…ENVA logoENVAEnova Internation…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$199.50$69.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts91023
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0410
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.5%+5.2%0.0%
MFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). XZO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallMedallion Financial Corp. (MFIN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XZO vs MFIN vs ENVA vs TREE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Exzeo Group, Inc.

(XZO) is the stronger pick with 62. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 6% for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE?

On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Exzeo Group, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE?

Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.

(ENVA) delivered a total return of +387. 7%, compared to -77. 4% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +21. 7% versus TREE's -43. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus LendingTree, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning TREE is approximately 43% more volatile than MFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exzeo Group, Inc. (XZO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exzeo Group, Inc.

(XZO) is pulling ahead at 62. 0% versus 18. 6% for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to 17. 1% for Medallion Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE?

Exzeo Group, Inc.

(XZO) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 1% net margin versus 9. 8% for Enova International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 7. 3% for TREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Exzeo Group, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 82. 7% to $69. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE?

In this comparison, MFIN (4.

9% yield) pays a dividend. XZO, ENVA, TREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XZO or MFIN or ENVA or TREE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14), 4. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFIN: +42. 9%, XZO: -11. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XZO and MFIN and ENVA and TREE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

MFIN pays a dividend while XZO, ENVA, TREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XZO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MFIN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENVA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TREE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XZO and MFIN and ENVA and TREE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XZO: 62.0% · MFIN: 21.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(XZO: 28.7% · MFIN: 12.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(XZO: 15.8x · MFIN: 5.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.