Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XZO vs NRDS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
XZO vs NRDS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.27B | $726M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $196M | $837M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $98M |
Quick Verdict: XZO vs NRDS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XZO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 62.0%, EPS growth 135.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.3%
- -10.1% 10Y total return vs NRDS's -65.5%
- Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 3.86x
NRDS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 62.0% revenue growth vs NRDS's 21.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs NRDS's 5.8% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.1% vs NRDS's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs NRDS's 14.8% |
XZO vs NRDS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XZO vs NRDS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XZO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRDS is the larger business by revenue, generating $837M annually — 4.3x XZO's $196M. XZO is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRDS's 5.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $196M | $837M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
Valuation Metrics
NRDS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, NRDS trades at a 5% valuation discount to XZO's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NRDS's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XZO's 8.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $726M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $971M | $628M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.05x | 15.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.44x | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.91x | 5.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.85x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.99x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.02x | 5.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XZO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XZO delivers a 30.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $18 for NRDS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRDS scores 8/9 vs XZO's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.4% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.4% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +78.9% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 315.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XZO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XZO five years ago would be worth $8,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,452 for NRDS. Over the past 12 months, XZO leads with a -10.1% total return vs NRDS's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRDS at 3.3% vs XZO's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | -24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.1% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +10.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | -65.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | -65.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
XZO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
XZO currently trades 78.3% from its 52-week high vs NRDS's 60.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.82 | $16.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.30 | $8.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.3% | +60.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 830K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +9.7% |
XZO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NRDS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
XZO vs NRDS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XZO or NRDS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the stronger pick with 62. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 7% for NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS). NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XZO or NRDS?
On trailing P/E, NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Exzeo Group, Inc. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, NerdWallet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XZO or NRDS?
Over the past 5 years, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) delivered a total return of -10. 1%, compared to -65. 5% for NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XZO returned -10. 1% versus NRDS's -65. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is growing faster — XZO or NRDS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is pulling ahead at 62. 0% versus 21. 7% for NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exzeo Group, Inc. grew EPS 135. 1% year-over-year, compared to 64. 1% for NerdWallet, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XZO or NRDS?
Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 1% net margin versus 5. 8% for NerdWallet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XZO leads at 48. 8% versus 8. 3% for NRDS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRDS leads at 92. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XZO or NRDS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Exzeo Group, Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — XZO or NRDS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is XZO or NRDS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NRDS: -65. 5%, XZO: -10. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XZO and NRDS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.