Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XZO vs TREE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Conglomerates
XZO vs TREE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Financial - Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $1.27B | $552M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $196M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $181M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 94.3% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $435M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $81M |
Quick Verdict: XZO vs TREE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XZO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs
- Rev growth 62.0%, EPS growth 135.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.3%
- -10.1% 10Y total return vs TREE's -45.7%
TREE is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 14.4x)
- +6.1% vs XZO's -10.1%
- 21.8% ROA vs XZO's 18.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 62.0% revenue growth vs TREE's 24.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs TREE's 13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (2.9% vs 151.8%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs XZO's -10.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.8% ROA vs XZO's 18.4% |
XZO vs TREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XZO vs TREE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XZO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 5.7x XZO's $196M. XZO is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TREE's 13.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $196M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $181M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +94.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TREE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 77% valuation discount to XZO's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TREE's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XZO's 8.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $552M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $971M | $906M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.05x | 3.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.44x | 7.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.91x | 8.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.85x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.99x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.02x | 9.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XZO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $30 for XZO. XZO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TREE's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XZO scores 7/9 vs TREE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.4% | +86.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.4% | +21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +78.9% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $435M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — XZO and TREE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XZO five years ago would be worth $8,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, TREE leads with a +6.1% total return vs XZO's -10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TREE at 28.5% vs XZO's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | -22.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.1% | +6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +112.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | -45.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +28.5% |
Risk & Volatility
XZO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
XZO currently trades 78.3% from its 52-week high vs TREE's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.82 | $77.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.30 | $32.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.3% | +51.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 326K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $69.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
XZO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TREE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XZO vs TREE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XZO or TREE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the stronger pick with 62. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 1% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XZO or TREE?
On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus Exzeo Group, Inc. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XZO or TREE?
Over the past 5 years, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) delivered a total return of -10. 1%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XZO returned -10. 1% versus TREE's -45. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XZO or TREE?
On balance sheet safety, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 152% for LendingTree, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XZO or TREE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is pulling ahead at 62. 0% versus 24. 1% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to 135. 1% for Exzeo Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XZO or TREE?
Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 1% net margin versus 13. 5% for LendingTree, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XZO leads at 48. 8% versus 7. 3% for TREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XZO or TREE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Exzeo Group, Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — XZO or TREE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XZO or TREE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TREE: -45. 7%, XZO: -10. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XZO and TREE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.