Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

YDDL vs CLFD vs HLIT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
YDDL
One and one Green Technologies. Inc

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • PH
Market Cap$186M
5Y Perf.-4.9%
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$618M
5Y Perf.+226.5%
HLIT
Harmonic Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+140.3%

YDDL vs CLFD vs HLIT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
YDDL logoYDDL
CLFD logoCLFD
HLIT logoHLIT
IndustryWaste ManagementCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$186M$618M$1.43B
Revenue (TTM)$53M$136M$500M
Net Income (TTM)$6M$-9M$-42M
Gross Margin19.8%37.2%52.1%
Operating Margin15.1%1.4%7.6%
Forward P/E21.1x85.6x23.0x
Total Debt$785K$9M$148M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$21M$124M

YDDL vs CLFD vs HLITLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

YDDL
CLFD
HLIT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD)100326.5+226.5%
Harmonic Inc. (HLIT)100240.3+140.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: YDDL vs CLFD vs HLIT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: YDDL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Harmonic Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
YDDL
One and one Green Technologies. Inc
The Growth Leader

YDDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 29.5% revenue growth vs HLIT's -46.9%
  • Lower P/E (21.1x vs 85.6x)
  • 12.1% margin vs HLIT's -8.4%
Best for: growth and value
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
HLIT
Harmonic Inc.
The Income Pick

HLIT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.54
  • 321.8% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 155.7%
  • Beta 1.54, current ratio 2.50x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthYDDL logoYDDL29.5% revenue growth vs HLIT's -46.9%
ValueYDDL logoYDDLLower P/E (21.1x vs 85.6x)
Quality / MarginsYDDL logoYDDL12.1% margin vs HLIT's -8.4%
Stability / SafetyHLIT logoHLITBeta 1.54 vs CLFD's 1.74
DividendsTieNone of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HLIT logoHLIT+33.2% vs YDDL's -22.3%
Efficiency (ROA)YDDL logoYDDL21.6% ROA vs HLIT's -5.7%, ROIC 34.2% vs 2.8%

YDDL vs CLFD vs HLIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

YDDLOne and one Green Technologies. Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

CLFDClearfield, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HLITHarmonic Inc.
FY 2025
Product
88.2%$267M
Professional Services
11.8%$36M

YDDL vs CLFD vs HLIT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLYDDLLAGGINGCLFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HLIT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HLIT is the larger business by revenue, generating $500M annually — 9.4x YDDL's $53M. YDDL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HLIT's -8.4%. On growth, HLIT holds the edge at -8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricYDDL logoYDDLOne and one Green…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.HLIT logoHLITHarmonic Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$53M$136M$500M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6M$46M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$42M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$16M$45M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+19.8%+37.2%+52.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.1%+1.4%+7.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%-6.3%-8.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%+11.8%+9.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.1%-8.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.5%+40.0%
HLIT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

YDDL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, YDDL's 20.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 73.5x.

MetricYDDL logoYDDLOne and one Green…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.HLIT logoHLITHarmonic Inc.
Market CapShares × price$186M$618M$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$185M$605M$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS35.08x-77.84x-34.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.05x85.59x22.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.05x73.45x51.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.47x4.12x3.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.06x2.47x3.86x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF92.91x25.01x14.74x
YDDL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

YDDL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

YDDL delivers a 36.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-10 for HLIT. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HLIT's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs HLIT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricYDDL logoYDDLOne and one Green…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.HLIT logoHLITHarmonic Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+36.2%-3.4%-10.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.6%-3.0%-5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+34.2%+0.6%+2.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+44.4%+0.8%+3.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9674
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.03x0.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$13M$24M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$21M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$785,070$9M$148M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16141.22x65.80x11.97x
YDDL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CLFD and HLIT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HLIT five years ago would be worth $18,933 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,768 for YDDL. Over the past 12 months, HLIT leads with a +33.2% total return vs YDDL's -22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLFD at 7.7% vs YDDL's -8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricYDDL logoYDDLOne and one Green…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.HLIT logoHLITHarmonic Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.3%+53.1%+29.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-22.3%+24.2%+33.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.3%+25.0%-20.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.3%+35.3%+89.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.3%+155.7%+321.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.1%+7.7%-7.2%
Evenly matched — CLFD and HLIT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — YDDL and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

YDDL is the less volatile stock with a -1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs YDDL's 25.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricYDDL logoYDDLOne and one Green…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.HLIT logoHLITHarmonic Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-1.50x1.74x1.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.23$46.76$15.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.61$24.01$7.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+25.9%+96.6%+84.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.986.781.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded293K194K1.2M
Evenly matched — YDDL and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", HLIT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for HLIT (target: $14) vs -4.0% for CLFD (target: $43).

MetricYDDL logoYDDLOne and one Green…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.HLIT logoHLITHarmonic Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.33$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts819
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.7%+5.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

YDDL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HLIT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallOne and one Green Technolog… (YDDL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

YDDL vs CLFD vs HLIT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is YDDL or CLFD or HLIT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, One and one Green Technologies.

Inc (YDDL) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -46. 9% for Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). One and one Green Technologies. Inc (YDDL) offers the better valuation at 35. 1x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — YDDL or CLFD or HLIT?

On forward P/E, One and one Green Technologies.

Inc is actually cheaper at 21. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — YDDL or CLFD or HLIT?

Over the past 5 years, Harmonic Inc.

(HLIT) delivered a total return of +89. 3%, compared to -22. 3% for One and one Green Technologies. Inc (YDDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLIT returned +321. 8% versus YDDL's -22. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — YDDL or CLFD or HLIT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), One and one Green Technologies.

Inc (YDDL) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 50β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning CLFD is approximately -216% more volatile than YDDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 39% for Harmonic Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — YDDL or CLFD or HLIT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), One and one Green Technologies.

Inc (YDDL) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus -46. 9% for Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -215. 2% for Harmonic Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HLIT leads at -16. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — YDDL or CLFD or HLIT?

One and one Green Technologies.

Inc (YDDL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 1% net margin versus -12. 0% for Harmonic Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YDDL leads at 15. 1% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLIT leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is YDDL or CLFD or HLIT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, One and one Green Technologies.

Inc (YDDL) trades at 21. 1x forward P/E versus 85. 6x for Clearfield, Inc. — 64. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLIT: 8. 1% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — YDDL or CLFD or HLIT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is YDDL or CLFD or HLIT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, One and one Green Technologies.

Inc (YDDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 50)). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YDDL: -22. 3%, CLFD: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between YDDL and CLFD and HLIT?

These companies operate in different sectors (YDDL (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and HLIT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: YDDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; HLIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

YDDL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLFD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HLIT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform YDDL and CLFD and HLIT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(YDDL: 29.5% · CLFD: -27.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.