Leisure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $3.25B | $111M | $3.31B | $7.45B | $14.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.83B | $254M | $3.40B | $9.58B | $5.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $160M | $-45M | $169M | $223M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 29.2% | 50.3% | 53.8% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | -7.9% | 6.1% | 4.6% | 23.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | — | 18.3x | 23.1x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $160M | $12M | $867M | $5.37B | $277M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $37M | $442M | $429M | $1.89B |
YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
| Clarus Corporation (CLAR) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
| Columbia Sportswear… (COLM) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
| V.F. Corporation (VFC) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Deckers Outdoor Cor… (DECK) | 100 | 337.6 | +237.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, YETI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CLAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 3.5%
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs COLM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
COLM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.17, yield 1.9%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.17 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage
VFC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +52.7% vs DECK's -15.0%
DECK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 30.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs YETI's 145.1%
- PEG 0.47 vs YETI's 5.34
- 16.3% revenue growth vs VFC's -9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% revenue growth vs VFC's -9.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 23.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs CLAR's -17.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs COLM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.7% vs DECK's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 25.4% ROA vs CLAR's -21.6%, ROIC 99.7% vs -8.2% |
YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DECK leads in 4 of 6 categories
COLM leads 1 • CLAR leads 1 • YETI leads 0 • VFC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DECK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 37.8x CLAR's $254M. DECK is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLAR's -17.6%. On growth, DECK holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $254M | $3.4B | $9.6B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $273M | -$11M | $251M | $748M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $160M | -$45M | $169M | $223M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $231M | -$12M | $174M | -$666M | $929M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +29.2% | +50.3% | +53.8% | +57.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | -7.9% | +6.1% | +4.6% | +23.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | -17.6% | +5.0% | +2.3% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -4.9% | +5.1% | -6.9% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +2.5% | +0.0% | +1.5% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +35.7% | -13.3% | +76.7% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DECK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, DECK trades at a 21% valuation discount to YETI's 20.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DECK offers better value at 0.51x vs YETI's 7.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $111M | $3.3B | $7.5B | $14.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $87M | $3.7B | $12.4B | $13.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.53x | -2.39x | 19.54x | -38.90x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.83x | — | 18.32x | 23.08x | 14.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.39x | — | 1.31x | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.10x | — | 14.33x | 22.05x | 10.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 0.44x | 0.98x | 0.78x | 2.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.23x | 0.56x | 2.03x | 5.03x | 6.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.34x | — | 15.29x | 21.97x | 15.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DECK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DECK delivers a 39.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CLAR. CLAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VFC's 3.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DECK scores 9/9 vs CLAR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.8% | -21.2% | +10.3% | +12.5% | +39.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.7% | -21.6% | +6.1% | +2.1% | +25.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.2% | -8.2% | +8.0% | +2.7% | +99.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.6% | -17.9% | +9.3% | +3.5% | +44.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.06x | 0.51x | 3.61x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$24M | $425M | $4.9B | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $37M | $442M | $429M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $160M | $12M | $867M | $5.4B | $277M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4218.35x | — | — | 3.79x | 301.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DECK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DECK five years ago would be worth $18,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,719 for CLAR. Over the past 12 months, VFC leads with a +52.7% total return vs DECK's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DECK at 7.6% vs CLAR's -27.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | -13.2% | +13.5% | +5.5% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | -12.3% | -0.2% | +52.7% | -15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.1% | -62.4% | -18.4% | -7.4% | +24.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | -82.8% | -36.1% | -72.9% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.1% | -13.5% | +25.9% | -45.4% | +986.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | -27.8% | -6.6% | -2.5% | +7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
COLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COLM is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VFC's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COLM currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs CLAR's 71.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.34x | 1.17x | 2.36x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.29 | $4.03 | $71.68 | $22.16 | $133.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.50 | $2.58 | $47.47 | $11.06 | $78.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +71.7% | +88.3% | +86.0% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 58.5 | 61.2 | 54.2 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 217K | 597K | 6.0M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
CLAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YETI as "Buy", CLAR as "Hold", COLM as "Hold", VFC as "Hold", DECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.0% upside for CLAR (target: $5) vs 0.0% for COLM (target: $63). For income investors, CLAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs VFC's 1.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.71 | $5.00 | $63.33 | $20.27 | $121.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 11 | 28 | 58 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.5% | +1.9% | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.10 | $1.20 | $0.36 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | +0.0% | +6.1% | +0.0% | +3.9% |
DECK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COLM leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
YETI vs CLAR vs COLM vs VFC vs DECK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the stronger pick with 16.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK?
On trailing P/E, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the cheapest at 16.
2x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. at 20. 5x. On forward P/E, YETI Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deckers Outdoor Corporation wins at 0. 47x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. 's 5. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK?
Over the past 5 years, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) delivered a total return of +80.
6%, compared to -82. 8% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DECK returned +986. 8% versus VFC's -45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
17β versus V. F. Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning VFC is approximately 102% more volatile than COLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clarus Corporation (CLAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 4% for V. F. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is pulling ahead at 16.
3% versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: V. F. Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to -15. 2% for Columbia Sportswear Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, DECK leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK?
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
4% net margin versus -18. 5% for Clarus Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DECK leads at 23. 6% versus -8. 2% for CLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DECK leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. 's 5. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for V. F. Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLAR: 73. 0% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK?
In this comparison, CLAR (3.
5% yield), COLM (1. 9% yield), VFC (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. YETI, DECK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YETI or CLAR or COLM or VFC or DECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
17), 1. 9% yield). YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COLM: +25. 9%, YETI: +145. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YETI and CLAR and COLM and VFC and DECK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YETI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLAR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; COLM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CLAR, COLM, VFC pay a dividend while YETI, DECK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.